Opinion Cassidy Hutchinson just gave us a smoking gun. But will Republicans care?
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
You’re kidding yourself if you think they threw her out there to testify without any corroborating witnesses or evidence of some sort. If they did they just gave an opening to Republicans to discredit the entire thing.
bins, the article said she MAY work at Mar-a-lago. Tweets. Edit: Realize you know that.
Last edited:
He’s full MAGA. He only thinks how he’s told to think.
You’re demonstrating an impressive ability to ignore everything they’re telling you about how unhinged and corrupt Trump was and is.
LMAO! You're demonstrating an impressive ability to be extremely gullible to the horseshit show.
What have they shown us thus far that wasn’t corroborated somehow?
The only shit is your president and the lies he shoveled onto people like yourself. Again, Nixon wouldn’t have resigned if Watergate happened today because of people like you.
Oh yeah sure. Tell you whatever they want, not release the thousands of hours of other video, have no consequence for witnesses saying things and turning out to be false. That's why this is a sham and for people like yourself just eating all up word for word and believing is very sad.
The deep state is letting all these witnesses get away with perjury? Seems like a slam dunk opportunity for a conservative prosecutor to make a name for themselves.
LOL! Yeah prosecutor in Congressional hearings that no one from the libs ever gets charged? You're bright!
Oh yeah I forgot deck is totally stacked for libbies to perjure themselves or allow former loyal Trumpists to do so to help them
Yeah you're right it's totally a fair game in DC where a prosecutor would actually have to win the case. It's such a 50/50 town, maybe leans to the right a bit. Andy McCabe sure got brought to justice for his lying. Clapper did too! You're brilliant!
| 1992 | Bill Clinton (D)
| 192,619 | 84.64% | George H. W. Bush (R) | 20,698 | 9.1% | Ross Perot (I) | 9,681 | 4.25% | 3 | [29][30][31] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Bill Clinton (D)
| 158,220 | 85.19% | Bob Dole (R) | 17,339 | 9.34% | Ralph Nader (G) | 4,780 | 2.57% | 3 | [32][33][34] | |||
| 2000 | Al Gore (D) | 171,923 | 85.16% | George W. Bush (R)
| 18,073 | 8.95% | Ralph Nader (G) | 10,576 | 5.24% | 2[d] | [36][37][38] | |||
| 2004 | John Kerry (D) | 202,970 | 89.18% | George W. Bush (R)
| 21,256 | 9.34% | Ralph Nader (I) | 1,485 | 0.65% | 3 | [39][40][41] | |||
| 2008 | Barack Obama (D)
| 245,800 | 92.46% | John McCain (R) | 17,367 | 6.53% | Ralph Nader (I) | 1,138 | 0.43% | 3 | [42][43][44] | |||
| 2012 | Barack Obama (D)
| 267,070 | 90.91% | Mitt Romney (R) | 21,381 | 7.28% | Jill Stein (G) | 2,458 | 0.84% | 3 | [45][46] | |||
| 2016 | Hillary Clinton (D) | 282,830 | 90.86% | Donald Trump (R)
| 12,723 | 4.09% | Gary Johnson (LI) | 4,906 | 1.58% | 3 | [e][48] | |||
| 2020 | Joe Biden (D)
| 317,323 | 92.15% | Donald Trump (R) | 18,586 | 5.4% | Jo Jorgensen (LI) | 2,036 | 0.59% | 3 | [f][50] |
Sworn testimony. No rebuttals despite the Committee's requests for information from the Secret Service and DHS. So, opportunities were presented.
As long as testimony under oath is on record and the agencies involved don't refute those testimonies, you have not or will not consider the situation.
Last edited:
Didn’t they have corroborating testimony this week also?
Again, these guys aren’t idiots. They wouldn’t have had her testify on nationally televised hearings if they thought there was a chance it wasn’t true.
