ADVERTISEMENT

Oregon Scouting Report

Auger

HB All-American
Sep 14, 2007
3,970
5,310
113
Live out west and have watched a lot of PAC 12 basketball this year. Was hoping VCU would beat Oregon as I believe the Ducks present more challenging matchup problems. Here is a brief report on the Ducks.

They've had some roster shakeup this year that messed with their identity early in the year. However by midseason and after Richardson got back they seemed to settle into who they are on offense and defense. They lack a consistent PG but aren't short on ball handlers. They don't turn it over a ton.

Don't be fooled by their low assist numbers. They don't feed the post and a lot their assists come off feeding the outside shot. Pretty much all of their starters can hit the 3 ball. Once they get going they can be tough to stop from 3.

They lack a good post game but make up for it with a solid to great 3pt and dribble drive game.

3rd team All-American Chris Duarte at 6'6" is a load to handle but 6'6" Eugene Omoruyi is the one to watch. He can score anywhere on the court. He mainly draws post matchups. If Fran puts Garza on him Garza could be exposed and he could pick up fouls. This also could force Iowa to the dreaded zone D to help Garza as well as the point of attack.

Oregon's D has been solid the 2nd half of the season. They can have off nights. Even with the lack of size they have proven capable of defending the post. However when they focus on it they can tend to provide open looks at 3. I saw their game against USC and while they controlled Mobley they forgot to guard one of USC's only good 3pt shooters.

I think Oregon's game plan will be to take away Iowa's shooters and give Garza space in the post. When Iowa's on D they will try to create mismatches to open up their shooters and will also drive at Garza. They will try to knock Garza out of the game with foul trouble.

The key for Iowa will be to keep Garza out of foul trouble and keep him from getting exposed on D. They need to close out the 3 ball. Force Oregon to shoot two's, even give them space inside. Just don't let them spread you out. On offense Iowa needs to pound the post. Also cleanup offensive boards. It will force Oregon to collapse in the post. Once they do that they have a hard time defending the 3 ball.

I think Iowa wins by 10. I think they maintain a lead most of the game. Oregon 3 balls keep Iowa from extending leads. In the end Iowa ices the game at the FT line.
 
Last edited:
Nice writeup, thanks. So how did a team that won the Pac 12 regular season title get a 7 seed, when 2 other pac 12 teams were seeded higher?

Pac 12 looks legit so far...3-0, soon to be 4-0 in tourney.

Would be interesting to a replay of USC Oregon...Mobley is probably the closest comparison to Garza in Pac 12.
 
FamousGlumKagu-small.gif
 
Nice writeup, thanks. So how did a team that won the Pac 12 regular season title get a 7 seed, when 2 other pac 12 teams were seeded higher?

Pac 12 looks legit so far...3-0, soon to be 4-0 in tourney.

Would be interesting to a replay of USC Oregon...Mobley is probably the closest comparison to Garza in Pac 12.

The PAC 12 were largely overlooked by the national media all year. That and the fact the non conference schedule was reduced resulted in the PAC 12 lacking national exposure. They don't have an elite team either. Many out west here feel Oregon were under seeded. At times they have looked like an Elite 8 team.

For Iowa it will really depend on what Oregon team shows up amd what the Iowa D will allow. One game Oregon is blowing teams out and looking like they can beat anyone. Next game they can't buy a bucket and are winning close games against ok teams or losing against quality teams.

The PAC 12 was like the B1G this year in that it was a very competitive league from top to bottom. The PAC 12 was just missing the Michigan, Illinois and Iowa type teams. Oregon is every bit as good as Ohio St. USC and Colorado would be 5-7 type teams in the B1G. UCLA well you saw them against Sparty. Oregon St's season reminds me of Rutgers. Ton of talent but inconsistent.
 
I will aslo add that I thought Iowa got a rough draw. Basically got two teams that have the talent to be 2 seeds. Oregon and Kansas. Kansas was playing their way to a 2 seed before they withdrew from the Big 12 conference championship. At times Oregon has looked like a top 10 team this season amd have the talented lineup to prove it.
 
The PAC 12 were largely overlooked by the national media all year. That and the fact the non conference schedule was reduced resulted in the PAC 12 lacking national exposure. They don't have an elite team either. Many out west here feel Oregon were under seeded. At times they have looked like an Elite 8 team.

For Iowa it will really depend on what Oregon team shows up amd what the Iowa D will allow. One game Oregon is blowing teams out and looking like they can beat anyone. Next game they can't buy a bucket and are winning close games against ok teams or losing against quality teams.

The PAC 12 was like the B1G this year in that it was a very competitive league from top to bottom. The PAC 12 was just missing the Michigan, Illinois and Iowa type teams. Oregon is every bit as good as Ohio St. USC and Colorado would be 5-7 type teams in the B1G. UCLA well you saw them against Sparty. Oregon St's season reminds me of Rutgers. Ton of talent but inconsistent.

Here let me give everybody the cliff note version of this post. The Pac-12 was very good...except it didn't have any good teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nelly02
Here let me give everybody the cliff note version of this post. The Pac-12 was very good...except it didn't have any good teams.

Basically what I said was they don't have a team that will finish win/loss wise in the top 10. However they have teams that can beat any of the top teams in the country. In tournament play that is all that matters. Why you're seeing the PAC play so well right now in the tournament. A team like Oregon can easily pull out a win against Iowa or Gonzaga.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
Nice writeup, thanks. So how did a team that won the Pac 12 regular season title get a 7 seed, when 2 other pac 12 teams were seeded higher?

Pac 12 looks legit so far...3-0, soon to be 4-0 in tourney.

Would be interesting to a replay of USC Oregon...Mobley is probably the closest comparison to Garza in Pac 12.
Well one team did advance in a "no contest". Kind of helps your odds of advancing.....
 
And a game I wish would have been played. VCU could have beaten Oregon and given us a more favorable matchup.
Don't disagree, just think its funny to say one league should have been seeded higher because they're are going to be 4-0 when 25% of the league didn't even have to take the floor to advance???
 
The PAC 12 were largely overlooked by the national media all year. That and the fact the non conference schedule was reduced resulted in the PAC 12 lacking national exposure. They don't have an elite team either. Many out west here feel Oregon were under seeded. At times they have looked like an Elite 8 team.

For Iowa it will really depend on what Oregon team shows up amd what the Iowa D will allow. One game Oregon is blowing teams out and looking like they can beat anyone. Next game they can't buy a bucket and are winning close games against ok teams or losing against quality teams.

The PAC 12 was like the B1G this year in that it was a very competitive league from top to bottom. The PAC 12 was just missing the Michigan, Illinois and Iowa type teams. Oregon is every bit as good as Ohio St. USC and Colorado would be 5-7 type teams in the B1G. UCLA well you saw them against Sparty. Oregon St's season reminds me of Rutgers. Ton of talent but inconsistent.


Honestly, I have to think that no regular season winner of a Power 5 conference has EVER been seeded as low as Oregon this year in the history of the tourney. That is pretty crazy to think about.
 
Luka needs to get back on track around the basket. He seems to be the clear advantage Iowa has over teams like Oregon, which doesn't have a true post. For the past few weeks, Luka seems to be rushing a lot of shots and missing inside shots that were going in earlier. He also seems a little less aggressive rebounding, which probably is to stay out of foul trouble now that Nunge is out.
 
Luka needs to get back on track around the basket. He seems to be the clear advantage Iowa has over teams like Oregon, which doesn't have a true post. For the past few weeks, Luka seems to be rushing a lot of shots and missing inside shots that were going in earlier. He also seems a little less aggressive rebounding, which probably is to stay out of foul trouble now that Nunge is out.

Garza needs to play his game. On D stay in the post and don't get caught out. Him getting into foul trouble early will be Oregon's #1 goal. If they can knock him out for chunks of the game the game swings to big advantage Oregon.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
Is the player Garza will guard a shooter? If not sagging off should help him and keep us in man to man. If so it may be zone.
 
Live out west and have watched a lot of PAC 12 basketball this year. Was hoping VCU would beat Oregon as I believe the Ducks present more challenging matchup problems. Here is a brief report on the Ducks.

They've had some roster shakeup this year that messed with their identity early in the year. However by midseason and after Richardson got back they seemed to settle into who they are on offense and defense. They lack a consistent PG but aren't short on ball handlers. They don't turn it over a ton.

Don't be fooled by their low assist numbers. They don't feed the post and a lot their assists come off feeding the outside shot. Pretty much all of their starters can hit the 3 ball. Once they get going they can be tough to stop from 3.

They lack a good post game but make up for it with a solid to great 3pt and dribble drive game.

3rd team All-American Chris Duarte at 6'6" is a load to handle but 6'6" Eugene Omoruyi is the one to watch. He can score anywhere on the court. He mainly draws post matchups. If Fran puts Garza on him Garza could be exposed and he could pick up fouls. This also could force Iowa to the dreaded zone D to help Garza as well as the point of attack.

Oregon's D has been solid the 2nd half of the season. They can have off nights. Even with the lack of size they have proven capable of defending the post. However when they focus on it they can tend to provide open looks at 3. I saw their game against USC and while they controlled Mobley they forgot to guard one of USC's only good 3pt shooters.

I think Oregon's game plan will be to take away Iowa's shooters and give Garza space in the post. When Iowa's on D they will try to create mismatches to open up their shooters and will also drive at Garza. They will try to knock Garza out of the game with foul trouble.

The key for Iowa will be to keep Garza out of foul trouble and keep him from getting exposed on D. They need to close out the 3 ball. Force Oregon to shoot two's, even give them space inside. Just don't let them spread you out. On offense Iowa needs to pound the post. Also cleanup offensive boards. It will force Oregon to collapse in the post. Once they do that they have a hard time defending the 3 ball.

I think Iowa wins by 10. I think they maintain a lead most of the game. Oregon 3 balls keep Iowa from extending leads. In the end Iowa ices the game at the FT line.
Great post - thanks for info, although after reading everything you wrote I get the feeling Iowa just might lose by 10 instead...:( I am getting an Illinois loss vibe - we won't have the speed/athletes to hang with them (unless Jbo and Weezy go off big time).
 
Great post - thanks for info, although after reading everything you wrote I get the feeling Iowa just might lose by 10 instead...:( I am getting an Illinois loss vibe - we won't have the speed/athletes to hang with them (unless Jbo and Weezy go off big time).

Their guards aren't like Illinois guards. More like really good wings or 2 guards that can handle the ball and shoot the 3. What has held them back in some games is the fact they lack a true PG and a true post. Illinois has like 3-4 guys that can take Iowa guards off the dribble. Duarte is probably the only true threat in that area for Oregon. Richardson has his games but not to the level of Illinois guards.
 
Garza needs to play his game. On D stay in the post and don't get caught out. Him getting into foul trouble early will be Oregon's #1 goal. If they can knock him out for chunks of the game the game swings to big advantage Oregon.
Murray seems to have become Garza's back-up. He has good hops and timing.
 
Their guards aren't like Illinois guards. More like really good wings or 2 guards that can handle the ball and shoot the 3. What has held them back in some games is the fact they lack a true PG and a true post.

Do we think JoeT would be more effective against bigger slower guys or less with all the possible shot blockers? Feel he could maybe draw some fouls with his quickness.
 
Do we think JoeT would be more effective against bigger slower guys or less with all the possible shot blockers? Feel he could maybe draw some fouls with his quickness.

Toussaint and Perkins would be great in this game. Have no idea why Fran didn't give Perkins more minutes in the 2md half today. He has taken huge strides this season. His ability to get to the basket and play solid D is key for Iowa right now.
 
Jesus everyone is pissing their pants. Guess what it is the second round of the tournament everyone is good. People seem to be forgetting that we are really f'ing good as well. It isn't going to be a cake walk. But if we are playing our best and Oregon is playing their best I take us everytime. Could we lose? Yes but I believe in our guys. Relax and enjoy the ride
 
Garza needs to play his game. On D stay in the post and don't get caught out. Him getting into foul trouble early will be Oregon's #1 goal. If they can knock him out for chunks of the game the game swings to big advantage Oregon.

It will be very hard to stay in the post on defense because his man will probably not be posting up.
 
Jesus everyone is pissing their pants. Guess what it is the second round of the tournament everyone is good. People seem to be forgetting that we are really f'ing good as well. It isn't going to be a cake walk. But if we are playing our best and Oregon is playing their best I take us everytime. Could we lose? Yes but I believe in our guys. Relax and enjoy the ride

Like I said at the top I think Iowa wins. It will be close but Iowa keeps a lead most of the game. If Garza plays anywhere close to 35mins in this game Iowa wins.

Also Oregon doesn't have the ability to throw different looks at Iowa. What you see with their starting 5 is what you will get all game. Their bench doesn't give them much different. The lack of a true pg and true post prevent them from hurting you in different areas or switching things up. Oregon is a great shooting team. They will try to break down your defense and create space for their shooters. If you give them space they will make you pay.

Iowa can give Oregon a lot of different looks. If Garza gets going in the paint it will open up the shooters. Even if Garza has to sit I still like Iowa's odds with Murray as the post and Patrick at the 4. Oregon's lack of a true Center doesn't give them any advantage in the paint if Garza has to sit.
 
Thanks for the detailed analysis. I'm not exactly sure how it translates to us winning by 10, but I'll take it.

In the few Oregon games I watched this year, they don't seem to be a team that puts a lot of pressure on the ball defensively -- something we struggled with quite a bit this year. They're also not very good at fighting through screens. Maybe they'll bring the defensive intensity for the tournament, though.

Richardson worries me as a 6'5" PG that can shoot. Bohannon's too short to really challenge his shot, so Richardson will be able to just shoot over the top of him whenever he wants.
 
Pac12 has looked pretty good so far with Oregon St, Colorado, and UCLA all winning against higher seeded teams and then USC looked good against Drake. You could definitely make an argument they were under-seeded due to the COVID-shortened season. And obviously Oregon won the conference and got healthy at the end.

As mentioned though it should be expected that every game from here on out will be tough. If our 3s are falling like they were today we can beat anyone.
 
Like I said at the top I think Iowa wins. It will be close but Iowa keeps a lead most of the game. If Garza plays anywhere close to 35mins in this game Iowa wins.

Also Oregon doesn't have the ability to throw different looks at Iowa. What you see with their starting 5 is what you will get all game. Their bench doesn't give them much different. The lack of a true pg and true post prevent them from hurting you in different areas or switching things up. Oregon is a great shooting team. They will try to break down your defense and create space for their shooters. If you give them space they will make you pay.

Iowa can give Oregon a lot of different looks. If Garza gets going in the paint it will open up the shooters. Even if Garza has to sit I still like Iowa's odds with Murray as the post and Patrick at the 4. Oregon's lack of a true Center doesn't give them any advantage in the paint if Garza has to sit.
I agree with your analysis. I've watched a few of Oregon's games and bits and pieces of a couple others and while they have some impressive pieces they are not world beaters. Unless Iowa comes out completely flat I expect them to hold the advantage throughout. Basketball is a weird game though and anything can happen so it's far from a given so the hawks obviously can't just show up and expect to win but I am confident they will take care of business and move on.
 
Thanks for the detailed analysis. I'm not exactly sure how it translates to us winning by 10, but I'll take it.

In the few Oregon games I watched this year, they don't seem to be a team that puts a lot of pressure on the ball defensively -- something we struggled with quite a bit this year. They're also not very good at fighting through screens. Maybe they'll bring the defensive intensity for the tournament, though.

Richardson worries me as a 6'5" PG that can shoot. Bohannon's too short to really challenge his shot, so Richardson will be able to just shoot over the top of him whenever he wants.

Bohannon likely draws Richardson just for the fact he is the only Oregon player that plays like a true guard. The rest of the Duck starters would just force Bohannon down closer to the paint where they would have a clear advantage amd are all plus scorers. This game presents matchup problems for both teams. Garza and Bohannon will have tough matchups on D. Everyone else plays into the abilities of Fredrick, Weiskamp, Connor and Murray.

On the flip side Oregon doesn't have anyone that can take on Garza in the post. If they crash down on him they play into Weiskamp's and Fredrick's games. They will tell Richardson to stick on Bohannon. Duarte will likely stick to Weiskamp as much as he can. Could be a big game for Murray and/or Patrick.
 
I will aslo add that I thought Iowa got a rough draw. Basically got two teams that have the talent to be 2 seeds. Oregon and Kansas. Kansas was playing their way to a 2 seed before they withdrew from the Big 12 conference championship. At times Oregon has looked like a top 10 team this season amd have the talented lineup to prove it.

Kansas was lucky to escape UTEP only a couple weeks ago and gave up 35 to a center today.

I'd take tiny Oregon or Kansas over other 6 and 3 seeds.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ThisHawks4u
Their guards aren't like Illinois guards. More like really good wings or 2 guards that can handle the ball and shoot the 3. What has held them back in some games is the fact they lack a true PG and a true post. Illinois has like 3-4 guys that can take Iowa guards off the dribble. Duarte is probably the only true threat in that area for Oregon. Richardson has his games but not to the level of Illinois guards.
Thanks again - I am feeling better now, although still having nite sweats thinking about Kofi's numerous easy dunks and Curbelo running by/through/around our guards like a hot knife through butter. ;) Good to know it sounds like Oregon has neither type of player. Stating the obvious, but Garza has to stay out of foul trouble (esp. with no Nunge) and we have to keep our T/Os to a minimum, which may be a tall order if they ramp up any kind of press when/if the nerves starts to mount. It also sounds like Joe T and Tony P may get the call again on Monday...thought both played well tonite.
 
Great post - thanks for info, although after reading everything you wrote I get the feeling Iowa just might lose by 10 instead...:( I am getting an Illinois loss vibe - we won't have the speed/athletes to hang with them (unless Jbo and Weezy go off big time).

Lol this is a terrible hot take. Sounds like Oregon has basically zero inside presence...and we only lost that Illinois game bc Cockburn had a freaking game both offensively and defensively.

If Garza's going up against some 6'8 dude and not a monster like Cockburn, we'll be fine. He'll feast
 
Great post - thanks for info, although after reading everything you wrote I get the feeling Iowa just might lose by 10 instead...:( I am getting an Illinois loss vibe - we won't have the speed/athletes to hang with them (unless Jbo and Weezy go off big time).

Oregon is built like Maryland.

They don't have the quickness of Illinois on the outside or size inside.

Duarte, they're best player reminds me of Wieskamp but a little better.

They don't have a matchup for Luka but there's no good matchup for him to guard either.

It will come down to who's able to exploit that matchup better.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT