ADVERTISEMENT

Packing heat, coming to a school near you soon

Three teachers at my high school are military veterans. When the topic of guns in schools comes up, NONE of them would feel comfortable carrying a firearm in school. But our elected representatives think it's a good idea.

And the deterrent argument is very weak. No school shooter goes into it thinking that they will still be alive when it's over. They are going to die by cop or die by suicide. Now a mentally ill person is going to think, "There may be a teacher with a gun, I had better not?"

I have one of my kid's old baseball bats in the closet. If there were to be a shooter in the building and my class couldn't get out, I feel reasonably confident that I, along with a few other students, would be able to eliminate the threat should I have even a five second warning. And I'm always extra nice to the kids that I think may be a potential shooter.
I wonder if they actually think it’s a good idea or if they’re paid to think it’s a good idea
 
The nuns always were packing when I went to school...
tumblr_mnbzr17o9C1qedb29o1_500.gif
 
Yeas, it is good. I worked for the Catholic Schools and churches and during an active shooter drill the officers told me and others to carry. I already was.
It isn’t good. This increases the chance of someone dying. How is that good?
 
I love how they want the teachers to jump through hoops to carry at school, but no one else in the freaking state has to do anything special to carry everywhere else in the state. Breathe and you get a gun.

And it won't make a goddamned difference, it just gives the GOP that special feeling between their legs.
 
Another factor. A simple google search shows that when police officers, supposedly highly trained at using firearms, deploy their weapons at a suspect, they miss over 80% of the time. How is the science teacher supposed to not kill a bunch of kids While he sprays bullets?

That's because no one shoots well in a high stress environment. Even SF/SEALs miss a lot when under stress, and they train by shooting A LOT in stressful situations, probably more than anyone in the world.
 
I guarantee one of two things happens in the near future and I hope I'm wrong, but:

1. Student steals gun from teacher and kills people

2. A jaded teacher shoots first and asks questions later.


That is a bet that I could push all my money into the table but I won't because both are sickening scenarios
 

Yeas, it is good. I worked for the Catholic Schools and churches and during an active shooter drill the officers told me and others to carry. I already was.
Here are just a few reasons off the top of my head why introducing guns into schools is a very bad idea:

First, introducing firearms into a school environment significantly raises the risk of accidental discharge, potentially leading to injury or death among students, teachers, or staff. Secondly, even with training, there is always a risk of firearms being misused by individuals with ill intentions, such as students gaining access to them or teachers mishandling them in stressful situations. Thirdly, the presence of firearms can escalate conflicts or disputes, turning minor incidents into life-threatening situations with irreversible consequences.

Those are just the "what could go wrong" scenarios. What about a complete Contradiction to Educational Values? Schools are meant to be places of learning, growth, and safety. Introducing firearms contradicts these values and undermines the fundamental purpose of education as a means to cultivate critical thinking, empathy, and peaceful conflict resolution.

Good grief.
 
Not a school but churches are wrestling with the same issues. Ministers torn between allowing churchgoers to carry or not. It is a no win situation for them.

Do they satisfy the small peen rambos and boost the attendance by these wannbe heros......at the expense of other parishners leaving if learning their church is a playground for these overage children.

It was a lot easier when churches were off limits for guns except of course leos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattymoknows
I have told this before, but in the USAF at Korea I was augmented to security forces for base chem warfare excercises. The squads were made up of Air Force people from all around base from various jobs. Even after training and many week long chemical warfare excercises when the shit hit the fan during the excercise it was friendly fire city because most people couldn't handle the stress and adrenaline.

This is why I believe it to be maximum stupid to arm teachers, who would most likely shoot at the first thing they saw move in front of them.

Yeah , well, it’s the Air Force. Sooo…

1d682494eb62ec10f52adf208917b2e5.jpg
 
Three teachers at my high school are military veterans. When the topic of guns in schools comes up, NONE of them would feel comfortable carrying a firearm in school.
I worked at a school and one of our elementary teachers was in the army reserves. He had 2 active duty rotations to the Middle East while I worked with him. He is also not a fan of carrying in a school setting.
 
Here are just a few reasons off the top of my head why introducing guns into schools is a very bad idea:

First, introducing firearms into a school environment significantly raises the risk of accidental discharge, potentially leading to injury or death among students, teachers, or staff. Secondly, even with training, there is always a risk of firearms being misused by individuals with ill intentions, such as students gaining access to them or teachers mishandling them in stressful situations. Thirdly, the presence of firearms can escalate conflicts or disputes, turning minor incidents into life-threatening situations with irreversible consequences.

Those are just the "what could go wrong" scenarios. What about a complete Contradiction to Educational Values? Schools are meant to be places of learning, growth, and safety. Introducing firearms contradicts these values and undermines the fundamental purpose of education as a means to cultivate critical thinking, empathy, and peaceful conflict resolution.

Good grief.
Okay, all of your post is just ridiculous nonsense. It’s a silly word salad trying to influence the ignorant against the responsible carry of a firearm in instances where a firearm is needed. Live in your fanciful world where the worst case scenario never happens and and I’ll live in reality. So stupid.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fivecardstud14
Okay, all of your post is just ridiculous nonsense. It’s a silly word salad trying to influence the ignorant against the responsible carry of a firearm in instances where a firearm is needed. Live in your fanciful world where the worst case scenario never happens and and I’ll live in reality. So stupid.
Why don't you enlighten us all and lay out this beautiful armed teacher plan. And by all means, feel free to use small words for us simpletons.
 
Last edited:
Bwahahahaha! Of course you do. You’re not pro life, dude.
For someone who thinks he is the arbiter of all knowledge on this board, this is a stupid post. How does hoping to deter shootings not fit in with pro life? Did you get hit on the head with a coconut?
 
Okay, all of your post is just ridiculous nonsense. It’s a silly word salad trying to influence the ignorant against the responsible carry of a firearm in instances where a firearm is needed. Live in your fanciful world where the worst case scenario never happens and and I’ll live in reality. So stupid.

The worst case scenarios, where weapons will be used in schools, will happen more frequently if teachers are carrying. That’s a fact.
 
I worked at a school and one of our elementary teachers was in the army reserves. He had 2 active duty rotations to the Middle East while I worked with him. He is also not a fan of carrying in a school setting.
IMO in order to use a gun effectively in an active shooter situation you really need regular pressure testing.

If you don't regularly practice a skill you won't be good at it and this amplifies in high intensity situations. There aren't a lot of good methods for pressure testing with firearms. I imagine a lot of ex military folks know this which is why they wouldn't want to carry.
 
IMO in order to use a gun effectively in an active shooter situation you really need regular pressure testing.

If you don't regularly practice a skill you won't be good at it and this amplifies in high intensity situations. There aren't a lot of good methods for pressure testing with firearms. I imagine a lot of ex military folks know this which is why they wouldn't want to carry.
Well, of course you do. So, let's use my 4'10", 25 yo daughter who's a MS theater teacher. She's up at 6am getting ready for her 45 min commute. She teaches all day, then typically has theater practice until 6:30-7pm. Another 45 min drive home to cook dinner and either have some quiet reading time before bed OR like she's been doing lately, studying for her elementary school certification.

Where are we inserting the much needed tactical training for a woman who can't even rack the slide and has fired a weapon once in her life.

Maybe she can spend her Saturday's doing this?

vBG_Qe.gif
 
This is a good thread, lots of good points for why this isn't likely to be a good idea. I particularly like @Moral USAF example.

I can see a potential deterrent, but think it's cancelled by the likelihood a student gets ahold of the gun, doesn't even have to take it from their parents house. Of course the damage would be limited in that scenario due to lack of ammo, but it's still a risk.

The question comes to mind. Iowa isn't the first to do this, how has it gone for others? They aren't talking about arming every teacher, merely telling those who want to have a gun that it's OK. I'm not spending the time googling it, but some sound statistics would be interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral
This is a good thread, lots of good points for why this isn't likely to be a good idea. I particularly like @Moral USAF example.

I can see a potential deterrent, but think it's cancelled by the likelihood a student gets ahold of the gun, doesn't even have to take it from their parents house. Of course the damage would be limited in that scenario due to lack of ammo, but it's still a risk.

The question comes to mind. Iowa isn't the first to do this, how has it gone for others? They aren't talking about arming every teacher, merely telling those who want to have a gun that it's OK. I'm not spending the time googling it, but some sound statistics would be interesting.
I have a feeling it would be more like this:

giphy.gif


Than this:

1JII.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: thewop
Or maybe we could increase school funding to include a resource officer (which I don’t particular like) but would be a decent middle ground.

Nope, let mr. Johnson keep his Kimber .45 under tha table case things get rowdy.
 
For someone who thinks he is the arbiter of all knowledge on this board, this is a stupid post. How does hoping to deter shootings not fit in with pro life? Did you get hit on the head with a coconut?
First, that's not remotely true. Second, there's no point in explaining, again, how things work in reality. But I will try. Allowing guns in schools is not going to save lives. You seem to be a pro-gun person, which doesn't make you pro-life. Ultimately, you're nothing but a forced birth guy. You're pro the number one killer of kids in America. But forced birth. Against women's rights. Not pro-life like you seem to think you are.
 
I hate the Iowa government. So effing stupid. More guns is always the answer for bought and paid for cons.
I hate that we can no longer live without fear that some nutjob is going to bring a gun(s) to school and start shooting up the place.
That seems to be more upsetting to me then someone putting something in place to try and stop said nutjob.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Tom Paris
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT