Interesting take. Losing Rahm would have been disastrous. Is there another sport as big as golf where this could happen?
Thoughts on PGA / LIV
1.) The PGA was in a war with LIV and the arms race was starting to turn in favour of LIV. (Rumour: John Rahm had agreed in principle to join LIV for next year)So, the PGA was starting to see LIV become more accepted, players could play in Majors, they still do well & WIN. Once the dam breaks, it’s over for the PGA. They had to do something.
2.) The Lawsuits were looking like they were going to favour LIV in the end. The money the PGA has to fight this + keep players + elevated events + lack of sponsorship $$$ for the Non-Elevated events = PGA is running out of cash.
3.) When coming to a deal, it’s best when the least amount of people are involved. If Jay Monahan spoke to players about this, it could have killed the deal because of their strong moral stance they had taken. This hardlined stance is the core of the issue. Jay never told the PGA players the actual extent of their inability to keep up with the Saudis & LIV. He had them fight his fight for him, without giving them all of the facts. He turned a business issue into a personal issue & hung the players out to dry. Not good. Not wrong, however, just shady.
Conclusion.) I think the PGA could see the writing on the wall with the lawsuits, how serious LIV is about golf, how deep their pockets are, players now coming around to the idea of going, the declining non-elevated events & Jay Monahan had to do the unpopular thing with the players / media and join with LIV. Realistically, how could the PGA ever compete with a league that has unlimited money that is going to pump “whatever it takes” to be successful. Sometimes strong leadership does the unpopular thing in the moment for the long term success of the organization. Jay Monahan is a hypocrite & he hung his players out to dry, but he is not wrong for doing what he did.