Let me spell out both halves of the truth for any fixated on the one half presented largely by
@Is_there_vodka_in_heaven in this thread.
1) Trues emphasized repeatedlly: a) AB tested positive for a detectable level of amphetamine: b) amphetamine is in the WADA banned substance list; and c) AB retroactively filed for a TUE after the positive test.
2) Trues largely ignored: a) AB had a valid prescription; b) the positive test came from AB's ADHD medication; c) the amount of amphetamine in the ADHD medication is low dose; and d) WADA had already determined taking the medication does not create a substantial probability of significant performance enhancement regarding this substance when taken in accordance with a valid prescription.
Instead of acknowledging the second half of the truths, false equivalencies were substituted in narratives relating to: a) use of ADHD without a valid prescription (e.g. Georgia tennis); b) correlation as presumed causation being greater abuse in the athletic population vs the general population; and c) abuse of high dose amphetamines (greenies) in MLB. Each is a false equivalency that does not presumptively apply to AB.
Even
@PatMineo22 saw fit to supplement his original tweet (in post #1 of this thread) with the parenthetical "(for adderall, not exactly a PED)."
Michael Phelps, the most decorated American swimmer, took ADHD medication. Many recognize that sufferers of ADHD fair better in individual sports (e.g., swimming, tennis, and wrestling). But somehow this generally understood correlation was not presumed for AB by some, like Vodka--but thankfully not all--on this board.