ADVERTISEMENT

QBs - quick take

KF often invokes baseball analogies. How about this one:

In MLB, batting practice is thrown by a coach standing about 40-45 feet from home plate. The BP pitcher throws fastballs at around 60 mph, mostly right down the middle. This is to help hitters perfect their mechanics and build confidence.

But it seems KF would prefer to use his starting pitchers to throw BP at 90 to 100 mph while aiming to hit the corners high and inside and low and away while mixing in sliders and curves and change-ups. In that scenario, hitters couldn't work on their mechanics at all, and they'd seldom make much contact, so "batting practice" would be useless because it would accomplish the opposite of what it's intended to. Get it?

So that's why KF would be smart to let Iowa's young offense play against the #2 and #3 defense, especially now while they're trying to learn a new system and build confidence. Doing anything else seems just plain stupid, IMHO of course.
Young offense????? This might be one of the oldest offenses in college football. I think 2 members of the oline and the starting QB have kids in elementary school already.
 
Dochterman just on KXNO and said Cade was way behind Sullivan and can easily see Sullivan as starter if this trend continues.
What did Dochterman mean by "way behind"? Way behind throwing the ball or knowing the new offense or both?
 
Looks like we're going to need Cade to stay healthy and be a non-turnover-generating game manager.

Sullivan throws like it's a shot put and Marco is afraid to throw at all.

Needless to say, defenses will still be loading the box and our offense will struggle.

No idea about the other 2-3, but the fact they aren't getting any run right now means they're a non-factor.
 
Ya know, you actually have a good point. Especially early in camp while learning a new offense, it might make sense for KF to play the first team O against the second and third team D. Many coaches do that anyway. And doing this would fit logically with KF's nonconference scheduling. He wants all cupcakes in the noncon because his is "a developmental program." So, KF, why not let the offense have a chance to develop against the backups instead of a defense filled with all-American and all-conference players?

Going against one of the nation's top defenses in practice can be of great benefit . . . but not right now.
I asked a defensive staff member a couple years ago if they’ve tried not having the offense go against the starting defense to build confidence for the offense. He said they had tried it and it didn’t make a difference. The offense couldn’t move the ball still.
 
KF has already told us he doesn’t know much about QBs and I highly doubt Cade won’t be under center so long as he’s healthy.

That said, I expect very little change from last season. Maybe a couple new wrinkles having the new OC, but I’ll be shocked if we aren’t near the bottom of every offensive team stat again this season.
 
KF has already told us he doesn’t know much about QBs and I highly doubt Cade won’t be under center so long as he’s healthy.

That said, I expect very little change from last season. Maybe a couple new wrinkles having the new OC, but I’ll be shocked if we aren’t near the bottom of every offensive team stat again this season.
I agree. No one here knows if the OLine has improved, if the WR's have improved, if Lachey can move. Based on the scrimmage, CMcN can't run and his passes were off while Sully showed he can run but also that his passes were off. Just because there is a new OC with a new scheme doesn't mean quality of play will improve.

Call me a pessimist (someone will be along shortly to do that) but I'll believe in the improved play when I see it.
 
If I was Kirk, I'd ask Parker to allow the offense to gain some confidence.
Parker’s scheme allows the offense to complete the easiest passes. It’s that you have to do it 30x in a drive.

The CBs play 10’yards off the LOS. You have LB covering slot WR.

When Iowa goes up against teams with an accurate QB and talent at skill positions, they get eaten alive in TOP and yardage.

Now in most cases the Iowa defense does not break until they’re tired. What i don’t get is the Iowa fan delusion of pitching shutouts as the only way for the defense to be successful. 3-0 in the average Iowa fan perfect win (and Kirk)

If Iowa offense cannot complete the simple underneath passes allowed in Phils scheme, they are going to struggle (and have for long ass time) against a defense who can disguise and pressure

Iowas DL didn’t really generate a lot of pressure last year and there’s concern about that same stat this season

Yet they were in the QB face on nearly every throw.

I don’t understand when you look at other teams scrimmages / practices their offense moves the ball against talented defenses. It’s not like Iowa is the only team that has talent or good scheme

There’s something fundamentally broken with the Iowa offense. Let’s see if Lester can fix it at some point this year to have any chance going into the future seasons. Cause we’re in a horrible cycle right now

No skill players in a horrible offense which doesn’t attract skill players which continues to perform poorly
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk
I asked a defensive staff member a couple years ago if they’ve tried not having the offense go against the starting defense to build confidence for the offense. He said they had tried it and it didn’t make a difference. The offense couldn’t move the ball still.
Can believe this when every pass is going sideways. Its a forward pass and Iowa doesn’t know how to do it
 
And how has that worked out for KF's offenses?

Pretty stupid approach by KF, based on the results. And sure, few teams have great offenses every season. But Hayden never had the worst offense in the country, and not for two years in a row. So there's that.
So you're saying, all the offense has lacked the last 5 years is confidence?
 
So you're saying, all the offense has lacked the last 5 years is confidence?
I think the idea is that the offense doesn't even have a chance to practice running successful plays against a stifling defense, so that when they are facing lesser defenses, the idea/expectation of success doesn't exist because it hasn't been experienced day to day.
 
I agree. No one here knows if the OLine has improved, if the WR's have improved, if Lachey can move. Based on the scrimmage, CMcN can't run and his passes were off while Sully showed he can run but also that his passes were off. Just because there is a new OC with a new scheme doesn't mean quality of play will improve.

Call me a pessimist (someone will be along shortly to do that) but I'll believe in the improved play when I see it.
That has been the approach to take for a very long time.
Any word coming out of camp or practices about new and improved offense should be viewed with skepticism. The signs so far are, to put it mildly, not great. But we won't know until we see them in game action.
They will probably be statistically better on offense. It might even be enough improvement to be apparent in game action. Moving out of the bottom 20 is a significant improvement. That's still bad, but it's not the worst.
So, the bar is set at improving enough to be a bad offense. If we are really fortunate it might even be watchable.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Iron Doc
The hope is that we can run the ball. That will be tough if/when teams are loading up against it, but if we can still muster some success on the ground, it should help open things up in the air. The trick/key will be making makeable plays, which we haven't been able to do in over three years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 83Hawk
Looks like we're going to need Cade to stay healthy and be a non-turnover-generating game manager.

Sullivan throws like it's a shot put and Marco is afraid to throw at all.

Needless to say, defenses will still be loading the box and our offense will struggle.

No idea about the other 2-3, but the fact they aren't getting any run right now means they're a non-factor.

 
2 coaches, 2 schools of thought.

Hayden always wanted his offense to go against the 2nd and 3rd teamers in practice because from a psychology standpoint, he believed in building confidence and that it would then transfer to the games.

Kirk has always been a believer in "iron sharpens iron", so he's always about 1's v 1's in practice.

Both men are/have been super successful in their approach, but it's always interesting to see those 2 schools of thought.
Ferentz has been better though.
 
Going against one of the nation's top defenses in practice can be of great benefit . . . but not right now.

It definitely can be a good and a bad thing.

I look at the sport of wrestling.

My son who was extremely good at wrestling would beat the living crap out of his practice partner.

It made his partner "tougher" but he never really got to work on HIS offense.

I always thought you wanted to go up against someone slightly better than you. You shouldn't go up against someone way worse or way better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
I asked a defensive staff member a couple years ago if they’ve tried not having the offense go against the starting defense to build confidence for the offense. He said they had tried it and it didn’t make a difference. The offense couldn’t move the ball still.
I think that very early in the season, we will see who really controls the offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Doc and SI_NYC
Yes, right after Timmy D. took one to the house before halftime. Not sure why he did that at half as rumored. And not sure exactly the breakdown on that last drive, literally threw it to the Mich LB w/no WR in the frame IIRC.
Tony Collins was open deep, Matt’s hand was broken and he should have taken himself out
 
  • Like
Reactions: amahawk
f I was Kirk, I'd ask Parker to allow the offense to gain some confidence.
Parker daring our offense to compete 1s vs 1s in practice!! Move the ball vs Castro, Higgins, Jackson, X…etc…you’ve done something!

dodgewrench-dodgeball.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Birky
Less than 3 weeks to games, Hawks looking like a team with no qb yet. Son of a gun it’s the same old story every year anymore.
I know it right, every year at Iowa we seem to have a qb competition (eye roll) . Wonder how them blue blood schools fans handle this every year???
 
Opinion: Stratton overtakes Lainez for 3rd string by September. Thought he was very much on time and mostly accurate with throws.

Speculation: thought accuracy issues for Cade were often throwing with weight more on his back than front leg which can cause ball to sail. Theory being that in drills he feels safe transferring weight to front leg (his brace leg) but in live action might have the yips due to fears players could roll up on his forward leg. For horizontal throws may feel safer (screens et al) as he isn’t leaning into traffic with it. Downfield throws take longer and his leg needs to extend towards the LOS.
 
Hindsight Stanley was a solid QB. What drove me nuts was his inability to hit WIDE OPEN recievers down field.
Nate missed some long throws no doubt. but he was a damn good QB. I'd argue that it was because we so rarely went downfield. You get good at stuff by practicing it. Check downs to zone runs into the near sideline don't get you those reps. As some mentioned, following CJB didn't help perceptions either.

As for the ongoing QB shit show. Cade does not look like the answer. Our #2 guy wasn't on the roster 6 months ago and our depth is young, thin (literally) and untested. Sound familiar?

I have to believe Lester took the job with the hope that he could position himself for a shot at HC in a few years. Hopefully he has enough success with the offense to do so. What he's learning is that KFz's blind spot for offense has killed recruiting at QB and WR (his mastery of the OL appears to have faded as well) If Tim can duct tape things together to make a serviceable offense...he'll be a legend.
 
Last edited:
Opinion: Stratton overtakes Lainez for 3rd string by September. Thought he was very much on time and mostly accurate with throws.

Speculation: thought accuracy issues for Cade were often throwing with weight more on his back than front leg which can cause ball to sail. Theory being that in drills he feels safe transferring weight to front leg (his brace leg) but in live action might have the yips due to fears players could roll up on his forward leg. For horizontal throws may feel safer (screens et al) as he isn’t leaning into traffic with it. Downfield throws take longer and his leg needs to extend towards the LOS.
...and that's with a no-contact jersey on too.
 
KF has already told us he doesn’t know much about QBs and I highly doubt Cade won’t be under center so long as he’s healthy.

That said, I expect very little change from last season. Maybe a couple new wrinkles having the new OC, but I’ll be shocked if we aren’t near the bottom of every offensive team stat again this season.
Very little change from last season? I suppose I'll take 10 wins again.

Btw, it's a completely different system on offense
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 83Hawk
Looks like we're going to need Cade to stay healthy and be a non-turnover-generating game manager.

Sullivan throws like it's a shot put and Marco is afraid to throw at all.

Needless to say, defenses will still be loading the box and our offense will struggle.

No idea about the other 2-3, but the fact they aren't getting any run right now means they're a non-factor.
lol…to your comment that Sullivan throws it like a shot put. I certainly didn’t get that vibe at the recent open scrimmage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greenway4Prez
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT