ADVERTISEMENT

Question for all the Liberals?

hawkssox1

HB Legend
Gold Member
May 2, 2010
19,948
8,865
113
E Iowa
What do you think about your girl Hillary refusing to call Islamic terrorist what they really are.Not all Muslims are terrorist but most terrorist are Muslim.
 
Last edited:
all terrorist are Muslim.

Be weary the word all.

witness-reportedly-says-dylann-roof-attempted-suicide-1434914210.jpg
 
This should get you started:
  1. Blacks are killers
  2. Mexicans are rapists
  3. Muslims are terrorists
  4. Gays are sinners.
True enough, but I was looking for the specific formula that GOP candidates regularly regurgitate. It's not enough to acknowledge that there are bad Muslims and Muslim terrorists. They have a specific way you have to word it or you are an appeaser or support terrorism or whatever.
 
True enough, but I was looking for the specific formula that GOP candidates regularly regurgitate. It's not enough to acknowledge that there are bad Muslims and Muslim terrorists. They have a specific way you have to word it or you are an appeaser or support terrorism or whatever.

Yeah, it's one of their more stupid criticisms of Obama and Democrats in general, and that's saying something. It's right up there with their bizarre insistence that it was somehow important when and where the State Department said that Benghazi was precipitated by the anti-Muslim film in its inanity.
 
Last edited:
I totally agree with her. ISIS doesn't represent Islam. Additionally, not all terrorists are Muslim. Next stupid question.

So when a "Christian" or a group of "Christians" says or does something stupid, they don't represent Christianity, right?
 
That was very interesting. Thanks for posting it.

Of course she didn't answer the question. Which was something like "how do you fight an ideology with weapons?"

And as fun as her rant on country after country that killed lots of people and "where were the peaceful ones?' was, you notice she left out the US. The US has started numerous wars and caused millions of deaths and (to put it in her words) "the paceful majority were irrelevant."

This is EXACTLY the same logic that the terrorists use. If the peaceful majority do not stop the terrorists, then they are legitimate targets because they are complicit through their complacency.

Until we stop killing innocents, what moral basis do we have for condemning others for killing innocents using that same terrorist logic?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
That was very interesting. Thanks for posting it.

Of course she didn't answer the question. Which was something like "how do you fight an ideology with weapons?"

And as fun as her rant on country after country that killed lots of people and "where were the peaceful ones?' was, you notice she left out the US. The US has started numerous wars and caused millions of deaths and (to put it in her words) "the paceful majority were irrelevant."

This is EXACTLY the same logic that the terrorists use. If the peaceful majority do not stop the terrorists, then they are legitimate targets because they are complicit through their complacency.

Until we stop killing innocents, what moral basis do we have for condemning others for killing innocents using that same terrorist logic?
Numerous wars? I will give you the second Iraq war but if you are trying to compare the USA to every single example she cited, you are way off. I mean, WAY off.
 
That was very interesting. Thanks for posting it.

Of course she didn't answer the question. Which was something like "how do you fight an ideology with weapons?"

And as fun as her rant on country after country that killed lots of people and "where were the peaceful ones?' was, you notice she left out the US. The US has started numerous wars and caused millions of deaths and (to put it in her words) "the paceful majority were irrelevant."

This is EXACTLY the same logic that the terrorists use. If the peaceful majority do not stop the terrorists, then they are legitimate targets because they are complicit through their complacency.

Until we stop killing innocents, what moral basis do we have for condemning others for killing innocents using that same terrorist logic?

This, one could not blame peaceful muslims in the middle east for considering the US one of the terrorists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I totally agree with her. ISIS doesn't represent Islam. Additionally, not all terrorists are Muslim. Next stupid question.
ISIS does in fact represent Islam. It's in the f'n name. It represents it, whether Islamists want it to or not. Just like you represent Imperialism. You're an American, and you are automatically equated with American Imperialism. Especially since you are such a fan of Hillary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkssox1
The church covering up child rape? You bet they represent Christianity. But Timothy McVeigh blowing up Oklahoma City? Not so much. This really isn't that hard.
You're right, but you're refusing to see it the other way around. Which shows your hypocritical worship of the state. Someday you'll grow up Huey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
Yeah, it's one of their more stupid criticisms of Obama and Democrats in general, and that's saying something. It's right up there with their bizarre insistence that it was somehow important when and where the State Department said that Benghazi was precipitated by the anti-Muslim film in its inanity.
Ciggy, people much, much more intelligent and informed than you, use you as an example of the insanity of the common American voter.

That's the truth of the matter. You can ignorantly deny that all that you wish. It does not change that fact. No matter what the story is on your chosen side, you'll always argue for it. That right there is just as bad as any christian. Because you have hard evidence to support why your support of one side is futile.
 
This should get you started:
  1. Blacks are killers
  2. Mexicans are rapists
  3. Muslims are terrorists
  4. Gays are sinners.
1. yes
2. they do have a problem with this, it's in their culture to be aggressive sexually. Including the women.
3. Yes
4. Yes, but aren't we all?

Dumb list.
 
ISIS does in fact represent Islam. It's in the f'n name. It represents it, whether Islamists want it to or not. Just like you represent Imperialism. You're an American, and you are automatically equated with American Imperialism. Especially since you are such a fan of Hillary.
Just because ISIS uses Islam in their name doesn't mean they represent them. Many organizations call themselves things that don't turn out to be true. Case in point: Fox News. There's nothing about Fox that is actual news.
 
Just because ISIS uses Islam in their name doesn't mean they represent them. Case in point: Fox News. There's nothing about Fox that is actual news.

Another damn lie. Geez, Red, you're on a roll today. I'd agree about the opinion shows at night, but they report the news during the day. Where did you go to school?
 
Just because ISIS uses Islam in their name doesn't mean they represent them. Case in point: Fox News. There's nothing about Fox that is actual news.
Well there is actually, though I'll say they are propaganda central. The point is that ISIL, has Islamic extremists within their groups. They represent Islam, regardless of whether the rest of the Islams want them to.

Would you say a common and reasonable conservative isn't represented by Fox News?
 
Well there is actually, though I'll say they are propaganda central. The point is that ISIL, has Islamic extremists within their groups. They represent Islam, regardless of whether the rest of the Islams want them to.

Would you say a common and reasonable conservative isn't represented by Fox News?
Nope. Fox represents the nutbags of the right, which apparently comprise the majority of the Republican party these days. My point is that Fox doesn't represent actual journalism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
So when a "Christian" or a group of "Christians" says or does something stupid, they don't represent Christianity, right?
Christians have a neat way of dealing with this. They simply claim that person isn't really a Christian.

As if Hitler; a baptized, confirmed, Christian who in his writings and speeches claimed to be doing the work of God, surrounded by priests, bishops and cardinals and never admonished by the church, wasn't really a Christian.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT