He is aware of the science. If your buddies disagree with that science, publish your own "analysis" in a real journal.
RFK JR is on Rogan today if you want to check out his brand of crazy
- Thread starter jawatkins
- Start date
Yeah, I'm sure he's aware of the shoddy "science" that's been done. In that case he just needs to stop lying.
Yeah, but pfizer made tens of billions, they spent piles of it buying more media and lobbying politicians, and round and round we go. Saps like @joesplace probably didn't even get a cut lol!
We should probably nationalize Pfizer so we can avoid the corruption and bribery encouraged by the profit motive
There are multiple vaccines available now.
You and your anti-vaxx buddies seem to be incapable of understanding that.
Sometimes I wonder. It seems at times that is the only way he would actually post some of the things he does.
Yeah, that'll do it. Let's give the people who take the bribes and bend the regulations even more power.
You mean what 99% of the rest of the medical field agrees with?
So crazy to be posting mainstream medical opinions, ain't it?
For example, if the mainstream medical opinion is the rate of autism has remained constant throughout history or that it's no big deal that inert placebos are excluded in the clinical trials for the entire childhood vaccine schedule, then I think it's reasonable to think it's crazy.
Autism can be triggered by childhood infections; bacterial or viral.
That is now well-established.
Ergo, vaccines will PREVENT autism when they are given BEFORE a child gets those infections.
Autism. Rate. Constant. Throughout history.
You're forcing yourself to believe (or lie) about something because it's the only way you can fit your narrative. Despite what the science says, and despite common sense. That is cognitive dissonance.
And most in the medical world I would guess knows the importance of inert placebo controlled clinical trials. It's not OK that vaccines got a free pass.
...because viral and bacterial infections have been "constant throughout history", Cletus.
Vaccines do NOT cause autism. That is fully debunked nonsense.
As you know of course I'm not disputing that. My point still remains uncontested.
If you argue with some clowns long enough they'll always refute themselves eventually.
How can one make the claim that vaccines actually PREVENT autism? Like 95% of kids in America are vaccinated yet the autism rates continue to climb, year after year after year.
If Joe or the CDC or the pharmaceutical companies actually believed this garbage they would be clamoring for a study of vaxxed v. unvaxxed kids and there are tens (or hundreds) of thousands of parents in this country that would LOVE for this to happen. Lets see the effects that vaccines have on autoimmune rates, SIDS, autism, etc.
But they know for a fact what an honest study would show.
So they keep spewing garbage. 🤡🤡🤡's
Because they can PREVENT severe viral infections.
Which are NOW KNOWN to be likely triggers for autism - they are HIGHLY associated with autism development.
Did your YouTube videos not inform you of this?
I didn't post any youtube videos, 🤡. And what you present as fact seems to be more like speculation as far as the science is concerned.
Autism is a group of heterogeneous, multi-factorial, neurodevelopmental disorders. Several factors play together to increase the risk of development of autism, including genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, together with antenatal and early-life infections. Viral infection during critical periods of early in-utero neurodevelopment may lead to an increased risk of autism. Maternal infection by DNA or RNA viruses that can cross the maternal-fetal interface may induce neurodevelopmental problems in the developing fetus. Viral infection induces neuroinflammation that affects many neurological processes, including neural development, brain structures, synapse plasticity, cognition, and behaviour; therefore, it may end in the development of autism. There are many shreds of evidence that rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, influenza viruses, SARS-CoV-2 viruses, and zika virus infections during pregnancy and early life can trigger autism development. Conversely, children with autism are at increased risk of infections, including viruses. Every effort should be made to prevent maternal and early-life infections and reduce the risk of autism. Vaccination against common viral agents may help to reduce the prevalence of autism. Immune modulation of children with autism should be considered to reduce the risk of infection.
Deykin and MacMahon[55] suggested that antenatal or early postnatal exposure to chickenpox, mumps, measles, or rubella did not increase the likelihood of developing autism.
Viruses and autism: A Bi-mutual cause and effect
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a group of heterogeneous, multi-factorial, neurodevelopmental disorders resulting from genetic and environmental factors interplay. Infection is a significant trigger of autism, especially during the critical developmental ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
You also didn't read your own link:
Infection is a significant trigger of autism, especially during the critical developmental period. There is a strong interplay between the viral infection as a trigger and a result of ASD.
The rate of autism was probably around 1 in 10,000 in the mid part of the last century. Around 1 in 36 post schedule ramp-up.
I'm fairly certain they've seen the data in the Vaccine Safety Datalink and it confirmed what they already figured.
Are we sure he doesn't have it?
Now he's resorted to quoting from the abstract of the study I linked in an attempt to prove that autism is caused by viral infection, even though the NIH (the world's foremost authority on medicine) states that "...we don't know..." what causes it.
They don't know...but apparently he does. 🤡
And we didn't call it autism back then? You sure about that???
History of Autism | A History of Autism Timeline From 1908 to 2022
Autism has progressed from being a symptom of schizophrenia to being recognized as a neurodevelopmental disorder. Learn more about the history of autism.
www.therecoveryvillage.com
No; it just was not classified as "autism" back then. In fact, in the 40s/50s, people didn't really talk about their "dumb" relatives much, and they were kept in institutions.
Sorry you were being ignored for so long man, that really sucks.
Nothing about what you sayid in agreement with 99.95% of the medical community.
Highly doubtful, this was already discussed. Let's not hash this out again, just go back and read.
We’ve never “discussed” this that I recall. You always ignore me. You don’t realize that 99.95% of the medical community doesn’t agree with you on vaccines?
Last edited:
