right wing trolls named the wrong man as the Las Vegas shooter
- Thread starter THE_DEVIL
- Start date
Geary Danley was not the gunman in Las Vegas who killed at least 50 people late Sunday. But for hours on the far-right Internet, would-be sleuths scoured Danley’s Facebook likes, family photographs and marital history to try to “prove” that he was.
Danley, according to an archived version of a Facebook page bearing that name, might have been married to a Marilou Danley. Police were looking for a woman by that name in the hours after the shooting, but later said they did not think she was involved. To name someone as a mass murderer based on that evidence would be irresponsible and dangerous. But that’s exactly what a portion of the far-right Internet did overnight.
The briefest look at the viral threads and tweets falsely naming Geary Danley as the attacker makes it easy to guess why a bunch of right-wing trolls latched on to him: His Facebook profile indicated that he might be a liberal.
[At least 50 dead, more than 400 injured after shooting on Las Vegas Strip]
Authorities have since identified the gunman as Stephen Paddock, 64, who was later found dead in a hotel room on the Strip. His motives remain unknown. But the fake Danley story presented a complete, desirable package to the elements of the far-right Internet that spread it. That phony story quickly embedded itself into the algorithms of Google and Facebook, where sites promoting the rumor remained at the top of the results for anyone searching for Danley’s name.
In excited all-caps, one anonymous user on 4chan’s /pol/ board posted that Danley was a “REGISTERED DEMOCRAT!” The thread spread quickly, as did a crowdsourced wiki page about Danley on Everipedia that, according to its edit history, once said that “Geary opened fired [sic] on the 34th floor of the Mandalay Bay toward a concert happening across the street.”
The Everipedia article dedicated an entire section to what it alleged were Danley’s political views:
This narrative, backed by no evidence or confirmation of Danley’s involvement in the Las Vegas shooting, spread quickly. That Everipedia post had 77,000 views as of Monday morning, just hours after it was created. It has since been edited and no longer names Danley as the shooter. His personal photos, taken from Facebook, were still plastered all over the page.
But even as those rumors were thoroughly, conclusively debunked, this false narrative was picked up in the algorithms that, increasingly, have come to define a person’s public-facing identities. During a search I ran about 9 a.m. Monday, hours after the real shooting suspect — a different person — was identified, the entire first page of Google results for a search for Geary Danley’s full name were links to news sites, YouTube videos, message boards and even several /pol/ threads repeating the rumor about him. There was one exception: a link to Danley’s personal Facebook page. There were no links to debunkings or to any mainstream news outlets that had identified Paddock as the attacker.
And for a time on Monday morning, one of those 4chan threads falsely naming Danley as the shooter was promoted by Google as a “top story” for searches for his name, as one BuzzFeed reporter noticed.
The right-wing news site Gateway Pundit also picked up these rumors as fact in a now-deleted article. That article’s URL was still the top result for Danley’s name on Google in the early hours of Monday morning. The headline, still visible in search results, and remaining on the first page of results for Danley when I ran my 9 a.m. search, read, “Las Vegas Shooter Reportedly a Democrat Who Liked Rachel Maddow, MoveOn.org and Associated with anti-Trump Army.”
And on Facebook, a search for articles about Geary Danley promoted seven links leading to inaccurate stories about him. The eighth result is a debunking.
Who has the time or desire to read that? Not I.
Obama encouraged them and encouraged blm and they were not arrested for looting and stuff jeez
This thread is about some random idiots who jumped to the wrong conclusion because they are random idiots? Wasn't it CNN (the same organization that has hosted presidential debates) that reported the Aurora theater shooter was an NRA member, but it turned out they named the wrong guy?
I'm not defending the random right wing idiots. I am merely saying CNN is just as credible as some random right wing idiot. They both seem to do the same amount of investigation before they vomit out what they call news.
I'm not defending the random right wing idiots. I am merely saying CNN is just as credible as some random right wing idiot. They both seem to do the same amount of investigation before they vomit out what they call news.
I'm not saying you're right or wrong. But, if you google CNN aurora shooting NRA there is nothing like you are talking about. You'd think someone would have it if they did something like that.
maybe he meant the virginia DC baseball practice shooter or the guy in Pennsylvania during Obama admin?
Forgive me, it was Brian Ross from ABC and he said the shooter was a member of the Tea Party. My mistake.
Geary Danley was not the gunman in Las Vegas who killed at least 50 people late Sunday. But for hours on the far-right Internet, would-be sleuths scoured Danley’s Facebook likes, family photographs and marital history to try to “prove” that he was.
Danley, according to an archived version of a Facebook page bearing that name, might have been married to a Marilou Danley. Police were looking for a woman by that name in the hours after the shooting, but later said they did not think she was involved. To name someone as a mass murderer based on that evidence would be irresponsible and dangerous. But that’s exactly what a portion of the far-right Internet did overnight.
The briefest look at the viral threads and tweets falsely naming Geary Danley as the attacker makes it easy to guess why a bunch of right-wing trolls latched on to him: His Facebook profile indicated that he might be a liberal.
[At least 50 dead, more than 400 injured after shooting on Las Vegas Strip]
Authorities have since identified the gunman as Stephen Paddock, 64, who was later found dead in a hotel room on the Strip. His motives remain unknown. But the fake Danley story presented a complete, desirable package to the elements of the far-right Internet that spread it. That phony story quickly embedded itself into the algorithms of Google and Facebook, where sites promoting the rumor remained at the top of the results for anyone searching for Danley’s name.
In excited all-caps, one anonymous user on 4chan’s /pol/ board posted that Danley was a “REGISTERED DEMOCRAT!” The thread spread quickly, as did a crowdsourced wiki page about Danley on Everipedia that, according to its edit history, once said that “Geary opened fired [sic] on the 34th floor of the Mandalay Bay toward a concert happening across the street.”
The Everipedia article dedicated an entire section to what it alleged were Danley’s political views:
This narrative, backed by no evidence or confirmation of Danley’s involvement in the Las Vegas shooting, spread quickly. That Everipedia post had 77,000 views as of Monday morning, just hours after it was created. It has since been edited and no longer names Danley as the shooter. His personal photos, taken from Facebook, were still plastered all over the page.
But even as those rumors were thoroughly, conclusively debunked, this false narrative was picked up in the algorithms that, increasingly, have come to define a person’s public-facing identities. During a search I ran about 9 a.m. Monday, hours after the real shooting suspect — a different person — was identified, the entire first page of Google results for a search for Geary Danley’s full name were links to news sites, YouTube videos, message boards and even several /pol/ threads repeating the rumor about him. There was one exception: a link to Danley’s personal Facebook page. There were no links to debunkings or to any mainstream news outlets that had identified Paddock as the attacker.
And for a time on Monday morning, one of those 4chan threads falsely naming Danley as the shooter was promoted by Google as a “top story” for searches for his name, as one BuzzFeed reporter noticed.
The right-wing news site Gateway Pundit also picked up these rumors as fact in a now-deleted article. That article’s URL was still the top result for Danley’s name on Google in the early hours of Monday morning. The headline, still visible in search results, and remaining on the first page of results for Danley when I ran my 9 a.m. search, read, “Las Vegas Shooter Reportedly a Democrat Who Liked Rachel Maddow, MoveOn.org and Associated with anti-Trump Army.”
And on Facebook, a search for articles about Geary Danley promoted seven links leading to inaccurate stories about him. The eighth result is a debunking.
What's your point? CNN said Tom Petty was dead today when he wasn't. What is your point?
Yeah it is, but it doesn't change the point I was trying to make. The mainstream media is no more credible than some random idiots. I guess I'm so used to CNN doing stupid things I just assumed it was them.
The DIFFERENCE is that CNN and other news organizations CORRECT the information that is wrong.
The rightwing idiots keep doubling down on things like Pizzagate and Sandy Hook being a covert government Op......that's not REMOTELY close to the same.
Yeah that's how it usually works. Someone has to point out the error, then its corrected. Hard to correct something you don't know is wrong.
Yeah I don't know what that means, or know if you know what you are talking about at this point.
You went to take a dig at CNN and missed terribly. It's OK watch the tape and come back strong with the next post.
I will slow down my typing for you -
They let the story ride until someone points out the BS - they don't call their own BS. I know, personal accountability is tough for the Left.
Again that is how it usually works. Every news organization does that waiting for someone to point out an error. Not sure what you are expecting here -- well other than CNN to question its own people work line-by-line to find errors.
"expecting"
truthful, honest reports - not made for tv mini series BS. THe press lost the majority of the world's respect the past year or so.
