SC denies Trump's petition to stop sentencing

[Gus is dead]

In this case, hush money is against the law. The rule of law doesn't care about your opinion.

You don't understand how this works. Did he get charged with making illegal payments? Was he found guilty of that? Campaign finance violations?

 

[Hammerhead02]

You don't understand how this works. Did he get charged with making illegal payments? Was he found guilty of that? Campaign finance violations?

You are smart. I don't understand. Law is incorrect. You is correct.

 

[RileyHawk]

No I do not take issue with paying hush money. What did you want him to list it as? Hush money? I don't see the cover up. I do see his desire to keep things from coming out, true or not, that would upset his wife.

I do take issue with taking millions of dollars from foreign concerns particularly those that are enemies of the US. That seems way more worthy of investigation and prosecution to me.

You just defined "cover up". JFC.

 

[RileyHawk]

No I didn't. Hush money isn't against the law. Maybe you should educate yourself.

I don't believe the ledger entries were meant to conceal.

What was the purpose of making the description of those ledger entries different than what they were actually for?

 

[Gus is dead]

You just defined "cover up". JFC.

No I didn't. Hush money is what it has come to be referred to colloquially. Legal fees sounds like a reasonable name. Or nda payment would suffice. Or just list as paid to stormy Daniels or whatever her non porn star name is. No one would list it as hush money in an accounting ledger. Jfc. That was my point. That you missed.

I get it that complex things are hard for you to understand. Read a sentence and ask yourself could I be misinterpreting what this poster said? Generally with you in particular chances are high.

 

[Gus is dead]

What was the purpose of making the description of those ledger entries different than what they were actually for?

See follow up post below

 

[RileyHawk]

No I didn't. Hush money is what it has come to be referred to colloquially. Legal fees sounds like a reasonable name. Or nda payment would suffice. Or just list as paid to stormy Daniels or whatever her non porn star name is. No one would list it as hush money in an accounting ledger. Jfc. That was my point. That you missed.

I get it that complex things are hard for you to understand. Read a sentence and ask yourself could I be misinterpreting what this poster said? Generally with you in particular chances are high.

Again, you are exactly what Trump described. Such a rube.

 

[RileyHawk]

See follow up post below

That doesn't answer the question.

You're not good at this.

 

[Joes Place]

No I didn't. Hush money isn't against the law.

In some cases (like this one) it is.
And a grand jury indicted Trump on it, and a regular jury convicted him.

 

[NoWokeBloke]

So when is Trump going to prison?

 

[Gus is dead]

LOL - the money shouldn't have come from a campaign account then.

You're a rube if you think the only reason he had the books cooked was to keep Melania from finding out.

You prove again that Trump supporters have no basis of argument against the crimes being committed.

At least you do acknowledge that Trump committed 34 crimes of false financial accounting. Explain why that, by itself, doesn't negate your support.

The 34 crimes are one crime for every entry. Thats simply silly. This is tantamount to being charged with a convenience store robbery and getting a count for every time you reached across the counter and grabbed another handful from the cash register. Every entry was for a payment to Stormy that was all part of the same overall crime. He divided the amount he paid her into a number of payments.

I don't think this crime is disqualifying. Nor did the electorate evidently. Cry more.

ALL of this was designed to label him as a felon, to do so before the election so as to tarnish his chances in the election, and to charge him as many times as possible to enhance the narrative so to speak. Seeing this any other way is simply ignoring facts because it fits you desired outcome/politics.

“For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind" Hosea 8:7

 

[RileyHawk]

The 34 crimes are one crime for every entry. Thats simply silly. This is tantamount to being charged with a convenience store robbery and getting a count for every time you reached across the counter and grabbed another handful from the cash register. Every entry was for a payment to Stormy that was all part of the same overall crime. He divided the amount he paid her into a number of payments.

I don't think this crime is disqualifying. Nor did the electorate evidently. Cry more.

ALL of this was designed to label him as a felon, to do so before the election so as to tarnish his chances in the election, and to charge him as many times as possible to enhance the narrative so to speak. Seeing this any other way is simply ignoring facts because it fits you desired outcome/politics.

“For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind" Hosea 8:7

No - you're wrong again.

You are exactly what Trump described.

 

[Finance85]

Barrett is becoming interesting. Can't imagine what twitter is like right now.

The left leaning posters hated her when she joined the SCOTUS. They said she would be Trump's rubber stamp. They like this ruling though. I wonder how they explain that?

 

[Mister_Man]