ADVERTISEMENT

Shock Poll Reveals Massive Voter Fraud

KanekoaTheGreat??? 🤣🤣 Hilariously wonderful source for info!! KanekoaTheGreat!! 🤣🤣 What, was KarnackTheMagnificent busy? 😆 That is priceless. The CEO of AI says well done!! Signed, Joe Biden, The President of the United States of America. 🫡
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael


It’s part of a steady diet of innuendo, misrepresentations and outright lies when it comes to the issue of voter fraud. Giuliani admitted he lied about Ruby Freeman and her daughter committing election crimes in Georgia. Stories that set the record straight about election innuendo are not typically broadcast in right-leaning media, which means that millions of people receive no information to help them make a more informed decision about what happened in 2020.

What these claims don’t take into account is that voter fraud is detectable, quantifiable and verifiable. I have yet to see anyone offer up “evidence” of voter fraud from the 2020 election that provides these three things.
My company’s contract with the campaign obligated us to deliver evidence of voter fraud that could be defended in a court of law. The small amount of voter fraud I found was bipartisan, with about as many Republicans casting duplicate votes as Democrats.

This is a crime of privilege: Those with two homes sometimes take two bites of the electoral apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael


Massive W. Raffensberger needs to be held accountable just like the put of control "republicans" in Arizona who are threatening Kari lake.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sober_teacher
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
"The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been monitoring election fraud cases state by state. Election fraud covers a range of activities — such as registering someone to vote and forging their signature, filling out an absentee ballot for someone who has died or moved away, voting while ineligible, or pretending to be someone else at the polling place and voting. They find that there have been 1,465 proven cases of election fraud — 1,264 of these resulted in criminal prosecutions and the remainder resulted in civil prosecutions, diversion programs, judicial findings, or official findings.


These may sound like big numbers, however, they must be examined in context. The findings encompass more than a decade of data during which, nationally, hundreds of millions of votes have been cast. For instance, in Texas, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed election fraud. However, those 103 ranged from 2005 to 2022 during which time over 107 million ballots were cast. There were 11 million ballots cast in the 2020 presidential election alone. The fraud in Texas amounted to 0.000096% of all ballots cast — hardly evidence of a fundamentally corrupt system."

Are you trying to say the only fraud is the fraud that's been caught?

I don't see any mention of fraud including people voting in more than 1 state.
 
I only need rational thought to know that voting machines and mail-ins welcome fraud.
U know what else welcomes fraud. Anything involving humans. All we can do is put a system in place that minimizes fraud. At a cost that is realistic
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
Are you trying to say the only fraud is the fraud that's been caught?

There isn't very much fraud to catch, Cletus.

Are you unaware that EVERY vote cast and EVERY registration in place is a matter of public record?
That EVERY instance of an irregularity is sitting literally out in the open for someone to investigate it?
That ANY fraudulent vote is fairly easy to detect because of these facts?

It's why the Heritage Foundation found MOSTLY local election fraud and very little national election fraud (like 300 cases over a 2 decade period). You claiming "they didn't really try"??? All the data is quite literally sitting in every precinct around America.
 
So yes, let’s limit as much possible fraud as you can.
Already being done. Internal controls that involve testing and retesting voting systems before and after every election. There are a lot of clever people who make a living out of trying to confuse consumers of mass information. Writing new tales of fiction exploiting ignorance. Cell phone pings around drop boxes. Bamboo fibers on ballots. Cheeto stains on ballots.
Some folks need to start applying rational thought to the old try and true risk/reward test. In order to be able to commit a fraud large enough to swing an election results. It simply requires too many people involved to not get caught. Plus all of those people need to be rewarded enough to risk decades in prison.
 
Already being done. Internal controls that involve testing and retesting voting systems before and after every election. There are a lot of clever people who make a living out of trying to confuse consumers of mass information. Writing new tales of fiction exploiting ignorance. Cell phone pings around drop boxes. Bamboo fibers on ballots. Cheeto stains on ballots.
Some folks need to start applying rational thought to the old try and true risk/reward test. In order to be able to commit a fraud large enough to swing an election results. It simply requires too many people involved to not get caught. Plus all of those people need to be rewarded enough to risk decades in prison.
when you base your distrust on your own feelings - and nothing that actually exists - you can always just ask for "more"

no matter what is done to make elections (in which people now expect more than 150 million votes to be counted in a manner of hours, or they claim fraud and cheating) safer and more secure, you can always do "more"

it's a never ending game
 
when you base your distrust on your own feelings - and nothing that actually exists - you can always just ask for "more"

no matter what is done to make elections (in which people now expect more than 150 million votes to be counted in a manner of hours, or they claim fraud and cheating) safer and more secure, you can always do "more"

it's a never ending game
No what we need to do is have everyone vote at the same time within 30 mins. So no word leaks of results. To influence voters or potential fraudsters of targeting their fraud. Also we need to have those votes counted by hand of every election everywhere a minimum of 5 times by 5 different people. And if they are off by any vote totals it needs to be done again 5 times until they are exact.
 
Already being done.
It is why "paper ballots" are 100% necessary (and/or electronic which print out a permanent copy of the electronic ballot).

Because then you are able to re-count the paper ballots by re-scanning them into entirely different machines, which can be audited and checked.

This was done in Georgia, multiple times, and Trump was still 12,000 ballots short. That did not stop idiots like @hexumhawk from making silly claims about "voter fraud".
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
It is why "paper ballots" are 100% necessary (and/or electronic which print out a permanent copy of the electronic ballot).

Because then you are able to re-count the paper ballots by re-scanning them into entirely different machines, which can be audited and checked.

This was done in Georgia, multiple times, and Trump was still 12,000 ballots short. That did not stop idiots like @hexumhawk from making silly claims about "voter fraud".
Safe and secure

In court in January, Halderman used a borrowed pen to quickly bypass the election software and access the machine’s operating system within seconds, before he later flipped a vote on the machine from George Washington to Benedict Arnold, a Revolutionary War officer who defected to the British. The hack required limited and cheap supplies, he testified.
 
Safe and secure

In court in January, Halderman used a borrowed pen to quickly bypass the election software and access the machine’s operating system within seconds, before he later flipped a vote on the machine from George Washington to Benedict Arnold, a Revolutionary War officer who defected to the British. The hack required limited and cheap supplies, he testified.

You get that because of the decentralized nature of our elections, something like this simply isn’t possible, right? Not to mention done almost entirely offline.
 




🤣

Gullible little simpleton.
 



🤣

Gullible little simpleton.

You saying some random, anonymous poster on X might not be the most reliable source?

😱
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Joes Place
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT