ADVERTISEMENT

Should Iowa public schools be FORCED to allow private school kids to participate in their extracurriculars and sports?

School boards can either accept or deny any individual's open enrollment. Jumping up from 8 man to 11 man football can add considerable cost to the district.
I’m curious how it would add considerable cost.
Most schools already have a field that would be big enough for 11 man. They would still have all of the equipment. I guess they could save a tiny amount of money on paint because they paint a smaller of field?
 
On this subject, several Iowa high schools elected not to field girl's basketball teams over the past few years. In atleast two case, a bordering public school district refused to allow the girls from the cancelled team to join their team. That should be addressed by the legislature.
That is a different scenario than parents deciding the school in their district isnt suitable for their child to attend but johnny wants to play baseball so that school should be forced to allow him to play
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hammerhead02
Pretty sure you are correct about the XC runner. But why does it matter if private/home schooled kids get to participate with public school kids?
Public schools get reimbursed based on the number of kids attending their schools.

Mid Prairie is not in this case because she's home schooled. So every expense they incur in training, transportation, feeding this girl...they are not compensated.

That hardly seems fair.
 
Public schools get reimbursed based on the number of kids attending their schools.

Mid Prairie is not in this case because she's home schooled. So every expense they incur in training, transportation, feeding this girl...they are not compensated.

That hardly seems fair.
Oh, I’m sure Mid Prairie enjoyed those State Championships they wouldn’t otherwise have.
 
I’m curious how it would add considerable cost.
Most schools already have a field that would be big enough for 11 man. They would still have all of the equipment. I guess they could save a tiny amount of money on paint because they paint a smaller of field?
More kids equals more equipment needed, more coaches necessary, bigger transportation costs, more insurance responsibility, expenses for literally moving the goal posts, etc.
 
You’re right it’s a no brainer.

By choosing to go to a private school, the public school in their area gets less state funding. NO WAY should they be allowed to play.
Valid point. Maybe charge an equipment or participation fee?
 
More kids equals more equipment needed, more coaches necessary, bigger transportation costs, more insurance responsibility, expenses for literally moving the goal posts, etc.
I was talking about your previous quote shown below. You said it costs more to go from 8 man to 11 man. Why would that cost more? I get if you have more kids out that you might have to buy more equipment. But you might have equipment from last year because you had more kids out. Also, one or two more kids might not bump you up to 11 man football either, not that it matters. Try and answer one of my questions for once instead of changing it to fit your answer.
School boards can either accept or deny any individual's open enrollment. Jumping up from 8 man to 11 man football can add considerable cost to the district.
 
Seems like the posters that usually want to be supportive and inclusive of kids of all cultures, demographics and genders…are the ones most angry and vocal about punishing private school children.

Sad what defending some of these positions, school vouchers, deportation, will cause a person to say and think about kids just trying to have the best life they can.
 
I agree with this by the way. In most cases it is in the best interest of the public school to accept them. Where it is not, they shouldn’t be forced to do so.
Keep in mind this isn’t just sports / it’s ALL extracurricular activities, at the expense of the public schools, which are simultaneously being under-funded my the same legislators who want to foist another unfunded mandate on them.

I’m old enough that I remember covering GOP legislative campaigns where ending unfunded mandates was a critical priority for taxpayer relief.

Of course that’s when the GOP was a serious party with ideas and not a clown show of idiocy 🤷‍♂️
 
Grown adults bitching about kids being able to participate in HS sports their school doesn't offer is next level stupid. So par for the course around here.
Where is your line in the sand. Private schools are taking funds from public schools. Should public schools be required to then pay for a private school student to participate in activities paid for by said public schools? If it is all about parental choice then the kids are going to need to accept their parent's decision.
 
Seems like the posters that usually want to be supportive and inclusive of kids of all cultures, demographics and genders…are the ones most angry and vocal about punishing private school children.

Sad what defending some of these positions, school vouchers, deportation, will cause a person to say and think about kids just trying to have the best life they can.
Since when is asking people to pay their fair share a punishment?

Where I come from, it’s called not being a freeloader.
 
Seems like the posters that usually want to be supportive and inclusive of kids of all cultures, demographics and genders…are the ones most angry and vocal about punishing private school children.

Sad what defending some of these positions, school vouchers, deportation, will cause a person to say and think about kids just trying to have the best life they can.
The school voucher scam is an assault on public education intentionally, period. For as clear eyed as you are on most topics this is where you're not
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
eh, nm.
I’m not doing this tonight. Enjoy yourselves.
200w.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: bojihawk44
People who send their kids to public school paying nothing but the taxes everyone pays, calling people who also pay those same taxes…and also the cost of educating their own kids…calling someone else a freeloader…
Lol. The private schools do NOT have to take in all kids and or accommodate them and the frauds known as private schools have increased tuition to match the new voucher. It's a ****ing scam and defunding of public education. Iowa was once #2 in the land for education and our quarter shows this. Not anymore under full Republican control since 2016. Mississippi North
 
Less state funding, but not zero state funding.

What a perfect time to mandate by law that those districts must provide for people that have opted out and reclaimed allocated dollars that were budgeted years ago.

That's how all the rugged individualistic entrepreneurs run their businesses right?
 
Last edited:
A lot of times student athletes are doing stuff to raise money for their sports already. Well at least they used to, can’t say kids now days do anything like that.
Still the case. In Ankeny at least, salaries for coaches and transportation to events are covered by the district…many/most other expenses are paid for through fundraising/concessions/entry fees.
 
I was talking about your previous quote shown below. You said it costs more to go from 8 man to 11 man. Why would that cost more? I get if you have more kids out that you might have to buy more equipment. But you might have equipment from last year because you had more kids out. Also, one or two more kids might not bump you up to 11 man football either, not that it matters. Try and answer one of my questions for once instead of changing it to fit your answer.
BEDS is based on the number of students in 9th, 10th, and 11th grade. It doesn't matter if only 1 private school student chooses to play football at a certain public school, I believe the entire enrollment of the private school in grades 9-11 would be included with the public school in the number to determine athletic classification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthernHawkeye
You’re right it’s a no brainer.

By choosing to go to a private school, the public school in their area gets less state funding. NO WAY should they be allowed to play.

But they do get funding for that student (approximately $1,205 per student). Certainly enough to cover the costs to accept the kid into that sport.

 
Last edited:
Still the case. In Ankeny at least, salaries for coaches and transportation to events are covered by the district…many/most other expenses are paid for through fundraising/concessions/entry fees.
Who does the fundraising? I am sure it is parents that don't live in the school district.
 
BEDS is based on the number of students in 9th, 10th, and 11th grade. It doesn't matter if only 1 private school student chooses to play football at a certain public school, I believe the entire enrollment of the private school in grades 9-11 would be included with the public school in the number to determine athletic classification.

Correct.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT