“Special Agent Sanger then decided to target an athletic facility at the University of Iowa because it was a stand-alone facility with restricted access to athletes, coaching staff and support personal. Again, this was done without a warrant, tips, complaints, or evidence that illegal gambling was occurring.
Sports betting case exposed
- Thread starter hawkedoff
- Start date
The Deep State strikes again.
Crazy how a local yokel can uncover all this but the Feds can't find out who owned the kilo of cocaine that was found at the White House.
Crazy how a local yokel can uncover all this but the Feds can't find out who owned the kilo of cocaine that was found at the White House.
Yeah and what school did Brian Sanger graduate from that got their asses kicked by Iowa in football/basketball/wrestling?
Civil rights attorneys should visit Ames & Iowa City.
Class action?
Class action?
Don't forget the Supreme Court leaker.
At the moment they're just accusations - albeit ones that answer alot of the questions about how this gets started.
Not sure I buy that this agent acting alone however.
Not sure I buy that this agent acting alone however.
Agreed.
This rings true, but I also doubt the rogue agent angle. If this accusation is accurate, or even close to it, I think we're only scratching the surface.
The agent gave a deposition and admitted what he did to obtain the information, I do not think that qualifies as a yokel stumbling upon the answer.
Yeah, if any of that is true then there's a bunch of people at DCI that need to be calling lawyers tonight.
Even if he was acting alone he did in the name of DCI and they let the investigation continue even after he was told to stop. So then...I guess he wasn't working alone...
They wouldn't have to look too far imo.
So Roberts and the conservatives who control the Court decided not to investigate the Justices as a leak source because they wanted to protect one of the three liberals?
Way to work it through.
Outing the leaker at that point was only going to look like some conservative based bias.
Better to let her know they know and at some point call in the favor for not reporting her.
call in the favor? they own a 6-3 majority, they don't need her for anything.
So you’re accusing the conservatives justices of blackmail?
Again, way to work it through.
Actually, getting a liberal yes vote on some juicy piece of jurisprudence the majority is supporting would be huge from the perception angle.
You must not know how things work at that level, by the way Smiley may have put herself in that position.
Sure. Get back to me when she crosses the picket line in some very unexpected case.
Let me just say "I'm much smarter than you"
That's a huge complement especially from a scrub like you.
Impressive considering she was not on the Court when the leak occurred or when the actual decision was announced. But what do I know? You're the self-pronounced "I'm much smarter than you" guy.They wouldn't have to look too far imo.
You vastly overestimate the regard I hold him in.
Btw, it's compliment, not complement.
Yeah, no. She was sworn in on June 30th, the day the term ended, when Breyer retired at noon. She was literally not on the Court until after the Dobbs decision came down.
If you read the entire post you will see it was just conjecture and opinion on my part.
The word for which you are looking is "compliment," you dim-witted nutcase.
In the immediate aftermath, any governor in any state is going to side with their employees. Let's see if she changes her tune with more information or doubles down...
