Hey, I know it can seem I get my rocks off by bashing a kid. I've been a long time supporter of Kirk and this program. But the last few years with Brian at coordinator I have sought some sanity by coming to this board to find people who can agree with me that I'm not retarded, crazy, or my eyes deceive me.
Nate Stanley should've been benched last year in the Penn State game. Brian Ferentz needs to go, and anybody still defending this offense either hasn't a clue about football, or are far for patient and far less passionate about this team than me.
There is zero reason to defend Nate Stanley the QB (I'm not saying he's a trash person who should die, just that he's not worthy of quarterbacking this team) and zero reason to have turned to one of the backups at some point given how awful he's played and how much he's hamstrung the entire team.
I blame Ferentz for not benching him, and it irks me that we all have to watch the awful offense, the players have to miss out on a magical season, all because we want to sing the praises of a guy who is not that good at quarterback. Why is it such a sin to say he needs to be benched? If the tackle were a turnstile or the kicker could only hit 50% of his field goals, we wouldn't hesitate to call for a change. But because it's the QB, it's worthy of exile to criticize him? Come on.
And as far as glass half full, I really don't see this team ever getting better now. Brian Ferentz will never change and this offense will always be in the 100s. That's unacceptable and you shouldn't feel the need to apologize for it because "we won."