yikes...
mRNA Vaccine Dispersion©Image Cresit: Shutterstock/ MDV Edwards
Contrary to expectations, mRNA vaccines do not remain localized at the injection site but disseminate throughout the body. Post-mortem examinations have revealed the widespread presence of these vaccines.
Despite mounting concerns and increasing reports of adverse events, regulatory authorities and politicians have consistently dismissed the significance of adverse event reports, undermining public trust.
In June, whistleblowers highlighted alarming levels of DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines, yet mainstream media remained silent. These findings cast doubt on the ‘safe and effective’ mantra surrounding these vaccines.
Kevin McKernan’s discovery of DNA plasmid contamination, including an SV40 promoter in Pfizer vaccines, challenges established beliefs about mRNA vaccines and raises concerns about cancer-inducing potential.
A German biologist whistleblower found contamination rates significantly exceeding recommended limits, drawing the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) attention. This finding underscores the gravity of the issue.
Recent studies, including one by the Cleveland Clinic, reveal that booster shots may increase the likelihood of infection, challenging the idea that mRNA vaccines can adapt to new variants.
Immunological imprinting may render further vaccines ineffective, making them not only redundant but potentially dangerous, with the potential to enhance infections.
Several studies point to antibody switching, T-cell suppression, and a potential role in cancer development, raising concerns about the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines.
The Dark Side of mRNA Vaccines – Unprecedented Levels of Contamination, Genetic Manipulation, and Hidden Dangers – Is It Time to Ban mRNA Vaccines?
mRNA Vaccine Dispersion©Image Cresit: Shutterstock/ MDV Edwards
Contrary to expectations, mRNA vaccines do not remain localized at the injection site but disseminate throughout the body. Post-mortem examinations have revealed the widespread presence of these vaccines.
Despite mounting concerns and increasing reports of adverse events, regulatory authorities and politicians have consistently dismissed the significance of adverse event reports, undermining public trust.
In June, whistleblowers highlighted alarming levels of DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines, yet mainstream media remained silent. These findings cast doubt on the ‘safe and effective’ mantra surrounding these vaccines.
Kevin McKernan’s discovery of DNA plasmid contamination, including an SV40 promoter in Pfizer vaccines, challenges established beliefs about mRNA vaccines and raises concerns about cancer-inducing potential.
A German biologist whistleblower found contamination rates significantly exceeding recommended limits, drawing the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) attention. This finding underscores the gravity of the issue.
Recent studies, including one by the Cleveland Clinic, reveal that booster shots may increase the likelihood of infection, challenging the idea that mRNA vaccines can adapt to new variants.
Immunological imprinting may render further vaccines ineffective, making them not only redundant but potentially dangerous, with the potential to enhance infections.
Several studies point to antibody switching, T-cell suppression, and a potential role in cancer development, raising concerns about the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines.
