ADVERTISEMENT

The elephant in the room:

Then Fran better bench Weezy at the end of games also. Since Jan 1 Joe has barely shot over 50% (24-42) from the FT line. If your answer is “he’s shown to be a good FT shooter throughout his career I would say so has Connor.
Were we discussing Joe?
 
Were we discussing Joe?

No but who do you throw in there at the end of the game if not your ball handlers? Connor, Joe W, Joe T haven’t been good at the line. Heck, even CJ is below 70%. So who do you put out there, who is also a ball handler, with Luka and Jordan?
 
No but who do you throw in there at the end of the game if not your ball handlers? Connor, Joe W, Joe T haven’t been good at the line. Heck, even CJ is below 70%. So who do you put out there, who is also a ball handler, with Luka and Jordan?
Good point. Perhaps Ulis, but I’m not sure of putting someone so green in in that situation.

I hope Iowa’s FT issues don’t comeback to bite them.
 
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.
This will fall on deaf ears no matter how many times it's posted. 4 out of our 5 worst combinations also involve Connor. He would not be getting these minutes on any other B1G team which the Connor huggers never dispute.
 
No he hasn't. He's 2 for 19 in the last 5 games. That's under 11%. He's been absolutely brutal shooting the ball. The only good thing about Connor's shooting is that he doesn't do it very much
The crazy part about this for me is that these guys shoot basketballs every fricking day. Yes, guys have bad shooting days, but stuff like this is unimaginable to me over multiple games (and I believe our ENTIRE team is worse at the free throw line this year? Different deal but still, hard to believe that's possible). A wide open shot really isn't THAT hard to make on a far more consistent basis. It might be if you're a Mechanic or an Accountant by trade but........
 
  • Like
Reactions: innercircle287
I wonder how Fran got the nickname "white magic."

CMAC had a pretty good floor game vs a Wisconsin team that didn't really have a scoring PF. In a lot of defensive matchups, Keegan is the better choice at the "4." CMAC is solid role player. I think he'd start on Nebraska, PSU, MSU, ,Minnesota type teams that need leadership. He would barely play at Michigan, OSU, Illinois.
He wouldn't sniff the starting lineup on any of those teams delusional.
 
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.
This is correct in many levels Including that Murray should play more than anyone else (not named Luka or Wieskamp)

Keegan had greater value analytical value than Conner does on offense and defense.

Keegan had 3 offensive rebounds (of his 5) which are 3 additional possession earned. We saw in the last Wisconsin game where 2 of his offensive rebounds in the last 2 minutes led to 6 Iowa 2nd Chance points There is more value in those rebounds than 4 defensive rebounds from Conner (not that 4 is bad)

Keegan had 3 blocks which prevented as many as 6 points.

The combination of those to elements, that no other Iowa player can bring, alone created enough value in an of themselves for the margin of victory.

Connors lone elite skill is ’feeding the post’, which is very good, but not exclusive to him, (like Keegan’s skillz are very much exclusive to him) other on this team can feed the post, just not as often, but they can and do feed it.

the opportunity cost for not playing Keegan is being exchanged for the value of feeding the post minus the negative value of being an extremely poor offensive player and when you put it to paper, Keegan easily optimizes Iowa Chances of winning.

jobo at point, can feed the post.
CJF is best assist to TO ratio in history , can feed the post
JoeT can feed the post.

and these guys also contribute other elite FF level things, which at this point we are wondering if Connor can do anything at the elite level, I’m now not certain he deserves the minutes he’s being given.
 
No but who do you throw in there at the end of the game if not your ball handlers? Connor, Joe W, Joe T haven’t been good at the line. Heck, even CJ is below 70%. So who do you put out there, who is also a ball handler, with Luka and Jordan?
At the end of the game last night I was thinking put in Aaron Ulis along with JBo. IIRC the kid is like 18 of 19 at the line across tons of games, and coming fresh off the bench. That's not luck folks. I wouldn't hesitate for a second, big game or not. He's a point guard, he's supposed to have the ability to retrieve a ball and not turn it over.

Worked out fine because we were able to get JBo the ball, but more great options are better. Aaron Ulis should absolutely be one of those options, IMO.
 
Joe T did something last night that Connor should think about. Got the ball wide open at the three point line, knew he shouldn’t shoot it, took a dribble or two in, and canned a mid range jumper. Beautiful play by a player that knows his weaknesses. You don’t have to shoot it where you catch it, you can move closer if you make the decision fast enough,
Connor can't even sink a mid range jumper most of the time though. We're talking about a major college basketball player that can't make a wide open 3 pointer, think about that. He shouldn't even be on the floor, and wouldn't be for any other team. His shot is just plain ugly, turns almost sideways, if he gets in the lane he always shoots some fade away crap that comes up short. The only other player with a shot close to as ugly as his is his brother. How can 2 sons of a coach have such awful looking shots?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wbrhawkeye
To clarify, Connor does understand how to feed the post. But that isn't a skill that every other player shouldn't have down pat when LG is posting up. Connor does it well and consistently. There's just no reason Keegan shouldn't be playing 30+ a game. Shit is foolish. He is one of the best players in the league. It's Ferentz-level deference and nepotism that Connor is getting those minutes.

So what you are saying is Fran loves Connor more than he loves Patrick. Would you be able to shed some insight on which of the Ferentz boys Kirk loves the most? I'm guessing you are in the Brian camp. Amirite?
 
At the end of the game last night I was thinking put in Aaron Ulis along with JBo. IIRC the kid is like 18 of 19 at the line across tons of games, and coming fresh off the bench. That's not luck folks. I wouldn't hesitate for a second, big game or not. He's a point guard, he's supposed to have the ability to retrieve a ball and not turn it over.

Worked out fine because we were able to get JBo the ball, but more great options are better. Aaron Ulis should absolutely be one of those options, IMO.

That’s fair. Jordan, Ulis, CJ, Connor, Luka would be my lineup if I need to get the ball inbounds and preserve the game with free throws. I’m shocked that Joe W has regressed so much at the line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24 so far
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.
This should be the end of the debate.
 
Iowa's offense runs through Garza, therefore, having a great passer to the post interior is very important to the team. That's why Conner is in there
 
Last edited:
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.
That site is pretty incredible to really breaking down a team. I did a breakdown of Luka with each with each player and guess who Luka has the worst number playing with? Connor and it's not even close. Like others have said in this thread, I'm glad Connor is on the team. He provides toughness, but if you look at the metrics he shouldn't be getting as many minutes as he does. It's glaring that Murray should be playing more when looking at the numbers and it's not really debatable.
 
This will fall on deaf ears no matter how many times it's posted. 4 out of our 5 worst combinations also involve Connor. He would not be getting these minutes on any other B1G team which the Connor huggers never dispute.

I really don't understand the love for Connor either. The whole "glue guy" sentiment is a euphemism for mediocre. I have a bad feeling some will be singing a different tune after today's game. Hope I'm wrong.
 
I really don't understand the love for Connor either. The whole "glue guy" sentiment is a euphemism for mediocre. I have a bad feeling some will be singing a different tune after today's game. Hope I'm wrong.
Glue guy describes Murray more than Connor.
all you need to understand about Frans player evaluation skills is josh oglesby. Worst shooting “great shooter” in ncaa history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbrhawkeye
Last comment I’ll make on it. I hope Conner has an excellent game today, always rooting for him. However, it’s my opinion that against athletic teams (ILL) he needs to play less than 20.

I go back to the OSU game. Conner got his 3rd foul early in 2nd half and we dominated from there forward. Believe Conners minutes were under 20. Especially lineup of JT, Cj, joe, km, Garza was just filthy on both ends.

Unfortunately next 3 games are against non athletic clubs (wisc, neb, wisc) so back to std rotation. We’ll see how Fran plays it today, if he properly rotates in athletic lineup to counter ILL guards ill be first to praise win or lose. I firmly believe it’s our only chance today unless red hot from 3. If we play Conner 28 I don’t think we can contain ayo and Fraser.

Go Hawks.
 
Glue guy describes Murray more than Connor.
all you need to understand about Frans player evaluation skills is josh oglesby. Worst shooting “great shooter” in ncaa history.

Fran has been right on players more than he's been wrong. In fairness, it's a tough position to be in to try to evaluate your son fairly. With that said, you have an obligation to put the guys on the floor who give you the best chance to win. I'm sure that Fran has convinced himself that playing Connor thirty minutes a game does that. I disagree, but that's not here nor there. The point is Keegan is your most versatile defender and gives you a scoring threat around the basket as well as the perimeter. He needs more than fifteen minutes regardless of what anyone thinks of Connor.
 
Connor is a decent player and helps the team. However, Keegan is a legitimate star with his productivity. Keegan is a better defender, rebounder, perimeter shooter, and scorer. Connor is a better passer.

It'd be different if we didn't otherwise have a PG and so we needed Connor at point. But when the choice is between playing Connor/Wieskamp at the 3/4 positions or Wieskamp/Murray at the 3/4 positions, the obvious choice is Wieskamp/Murray. I'm not trying to diminish Connor's contributions as a player, but Murray needs to be getting at least 25+ minutes per game. His combination of efficient scoring, rebounding, steals, and blocks is better than Aaron White's career averages, for example. Would anyone here really argue that Connor should be getting more playing time than Aaron White if he were on this team?

If people really think Connor needs 25+ minutes too, those minutes should be coming from someone other than Murray - most likely Bohannon.
Well I think the consensus would be that Aaron White should sit because I remember he was nowhere near as good of a post entry pass as CMac
 
Glue guy describes Murray more than Connor.
all you need to understand about Frans player evaluation skills is josh oglesby. Worst shooting “great shooter” in ncaa history.
You really think Fran sucks at evaluating talent?
 
Fran can’t coach, can’t evaluate talent, and his teams suck at defense. So I would ask the idiot posters......how are we a lock for a 2 seed in the Big Dance if the above comments are true?
They would say that all the talent fell into his lap, did their own self improvement, and they ignore the coaching staff during the games that they win. McC only really coached those 7 losses.

😉
 
They would say that all the talent fell into his lap, did their own self improvement, and they ignore the coaching staff during the games that they win. McC only really coached those 7 losses.

😉

No one is saying that. I love Fran and he’s done an amazing job. Doesn’t make him infallible. Guy is equal parts stubborn and loyal. That’s a double edge sword. Add in coaching your own sons and the difficulty that brings.

I think it’s OK to debate based on the metrics. It’s a basketball board, debate the points made. The “coach knows better” no matter what mantra is boring.
 
No one is saying that. I love Fran and he’s done an amazing job. Doesn’t make him infallible. Guy is equal parts stubborn and loyal. That’s a double edge sword. Add in coaching your own sons and the difficulty that brings.

I think it’s OK to debate based on the metrics. It’s a basketball board, debate the points made. The “coach knows better” no matter what mantra is boring.
So does the "anonymous message board poster knows better no matter what" mantra.

Iowa is 21-7 and rated top 5 in the country. I think the coaching staff deserves a hell of a lot more credit for this than most of you haters are willing to give them. You love him, blah, blah, but he favors his sons, yadda, yadda, he doesn't play this flavor of the day enough, would have won if he'd only done what I would have, etc. You do realize that it sounds like you have a humongous ego, don't you? And you really don't have a clue.
 
[/QUOTE]
Were we discussing Joe?

Well, he fit your criteria when you said it was “idiocy” to have a 50% FT shooter on the court late in the game When you should have said “it’s idiocy to have your son on the court late in the game” Because Joe also fit your description.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BBHawk
No one is saying that Coach McCaffery is infallible. But the incessant bitching after the way this team performed since early February is mind bottling. The “yeah but” arguments are beyond tiresome.
Just to be clear, I'm not bitching about Fran. I'm under the opinion, supported by facts, that Murray gives Iowa the best chance to win.
 
Fran can’t coach, can’t evaluate talent, and his teams suck at defense. So I would ask the idiot posters......how are we a lock for a 2 seed in the Big Dance if the above comments are true?
If you think Fran has been anywhere near good with playing time I don’t know what to tell you.
 
I really don't understand the love for Connor either. The whole "glue guy" sentiment is a euphemism for mediocre. I have a bad feeling some will be singing a different tune after today's game. Hope I'm wrong.
I don't think it will register until an unfortunate early exit. Even than the blame will go on JW, Jbo, or Garza if they aren't lights out. The metrics show exactly what my unbiased eyes show. I have no reason to not want him in the game. I don't know any of the players and wish them all the best. More importantly I want the deep NCAA run with this once in a 20 year team and it is painfully obvious there is 1 player that slows them down.
That site is pretty incredible to really breaking down a team. I did a breakdown of Luka with each with each player and guess who Luka has the worst number playing with? Connor and it's not even close. Like others have said in this thread, I'm glad Connor is on the team. He provides toughness, but if you look at the metrics he shouldn't be getting as many minutes as he does. It's glaring that Murray should be playing more when looking at the numbers and it's not really debatable.
This should be obvious to everyone. When Connor is in Luka gets doubled and forces more shots.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT