ADVERTISEMENT

The elephant in the room:

I don't think it will register until an unfortunate early exit. Even than the blame will go on JW, Jbo, or Garza if they aren't lights out. The metrics show exactly what my unbiased eyes show. I have no reason to not want him in the game. I don't know any of the players and wish them all the best. More importantly I want the deep NCAA run with this once in a 20 year team and it is painfully obvious there is 1 player that slows them down.

This should be obvious to everyone. When Connor is in Luka gets doubled and forces more shots.

I agree. I want Iowa to go far too. I think they are limited with Connor on the floor.
 
Pathetic. Perkins was good offensively in limited minutes and actually played good defense against Ayo. Ridiculous he gets pulled.
Perkins looked great in his limited time. I don't see how the coaches fail to notice the upgrade when he came in. JT also had good minutes. It's a shame he never got a longer leash with the starters earlier in the year. He makes so many little plays that offset his TO's. I think his TO's would slowly lower with more time earlier in the year and more time with the starters. He played a lot with backups who were still learning where to be.
 
Top 8 team with a probable #2seed and some are still whining about Fran. An outstanding job without elite athletic ability and quickness.
 
Conner's +/- today was -4, one of the best on the team. Just because he doesn't score much or have big stats in general (though sometimes he does) doesn't mean he doesn't have a major positive presence on the floor. Team did worse when he wasn't in the game.
 
Cmac's line is not going to get it done against a team as good as Illinois.

And for those that want to frame this as connor bashing. I would think of this more as...we have a much higher ceiling with Keegan on the floor. His defense and rebounding alone are invaluable. I realize we would be giving up the tremendous passing...but that is a trade off I am willing to make.
 
Fran has very few shortcomings. Defense and subbing has always been an issue. I don’t question offense oob plays or his relationships with players.
but
His defense and subbing have always been sub par. Well t.o usage too.
agree here, add this one in for me, the game yesterday it is amazing to me we are in year 4 and cannot defend the pick and roll with LG in. not even close,
 
The truth? This is comical. Fran sucks per you so I'm amused.

Fran has an ethical duty to play the best guys...he owes it to all his recruits and it is part of the job description. Fran believes in seniority so CMAC being a veteran player, no surprise he is playing some minutes. CMAC is a solid player, but Fran opens up an avenue for criticism by playing him way more minutes than his abilities suggest he should be playing..

CMAC is on schedule to start next year and play 30 minutes/game. PMAC is going to get more minutes. Fredrick is a lock. Keegan is a lock. There aren't a lot of minutes left for next year, so I would not be surprised to see transfers in spring and I think that will be due to how Fran managed minutes this season. Hopefully we dodge the bullet and don't lose any of the promising Freshmen.
 
Fran has an ethical duty to play the best guys...he owes it to all his recruits and it is part of the job description. Fran believes in seniority so CMAC being a veteran player, no surprise he is playing some minutes. CMAC is a solid player, but Fran opens up an avenue for criticism by playing him way more minutes than his abilities suggest he should be playing..

CMAC is on schedule to start next year and play 30 minutes/game. PMAC is going to get more minutes. Fredrick is a lock. Keegan is a lock. There aren't a lot of minutes left for next year, so I would not be surprised to see transfers in spring and I think that will be due to how Fran managed minutes this season. Hopefully we dodge the bullet and don't lose any of the promising Freshmen.

I think it's likely Connor had a lot to do with why guys like DJ Carton, Jalen Suggs, etc. ruled out Iowa at some point in their recruitment. No one wants to compete against the coach's son for playing time.
 
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.

Basically what you're saying is the advanced metrics back up whats already completely obvious by just watching the game.

Iowa is a significantly better team with Keegan at the 4.

The 4 man needs to play defense and rebound, theres 3 other guards on the floor who can feed the post.
 
Why do some of you regurgitate this BS. 4 of our 5 worst lineups involve Connor. He turns it over every time he shoots. We have a final 4 type team that will likely miss the sweet 16 because Connor gets minutes. Even at the end of the Game Wisc wanted to foul Connor instead of Garza. He should never be in at end of games. He shouldn't be in the game at all. We have great passers in CJ and JBO. Connor is dead weight for this team. He would not get minutes for any other Big Ten team and you guys know it.

Anyone who thinks Connor is as good as Keegan is too stupid to help. It's criminal that Connor gets minutes above Kris or Patrick let alone Keegan.

Pretty much this.
 
Fran has very few shortcomings. Defense and subbing has always been an issue. I don’t question offense oob plays or his relationships with players.
but
His defense and subbing have always been sub par. Well t.o usage too.

late game strategy would love to be on your list of sub par items, as would anger management (towards both refs and media)
 
That site is pretty incredible to really breaking down a team. I did a breakdown of Luka with each with each player and guess who Luka has the worst number playing with? Connor and it's not even close. Like others have said in this thread, I'm glad Connor is on the team. He provides toughness, but if you look at the metrics he shouldn't be getting as many minutes as he does. It's glaring that Murray should be playing more when looking at the numbers and it's not really debatable.

Yep, Connors great entry passing is mostly negated by the fact that the opponent can just leave him to double without consequence.

Connor isn't a bum but this team would be better if his minutes were being divided between Murray, Perkins.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BlackNGoldBleeder
Fran has been right on players more than he's been wrong. In fairness, it's a tough position to be in to try to evaluate your son fairly. With that said, you have an obligation to put the guys on the floor who give you the best chance to win. I'm sure that Fran has convinced himself that playing Connor thirty minutes a game does that. I disagree, but that's not here nor there. The point is Keegan is your most versatile defender and gives you a scoring threat around the basket as well as the perimeter. He needs more than fifteen minutes regardless of what anyone thinks of Connor.

Fran has definitely convinced himself that Connors value is more important than it actually is.

Its not that hard to get why. Hes the smartest and most poised player on the team. Combined that with it being his son and you get it.

Parents make judgment decisions they would never make otherwise when it involves their kids.
 
Fran has an ethical duty to play the best guys...he owes it to all his recruits and it is part of the job description. Fran believes in seniority so CMAC being a veteran player, no surprise he is playing some minutes. CMAC is a solid player, but Fran opens up an avenue for criticism by playing him way more minutes than his abilities suggest he should be playing..

CMAC is on schedule to start next year and play 30 minutes/game. PMAC is going to get more minutes. Fredrick is a lock. Keegan is a lock. There aren't a lot of minutes left for next year, so I would not be surprised to see transfers in spring and I think that will be due to how Fran managed minutes this season. Hopefully we dodge the bullet and don't lose any of the promising Freshmen.

Im holding out hope Connor will concentrate on baseball next year as it will be his fifth year and most of the guys he's played with are moving on.

His skill set won't compliment the players around him nearly as much next year either.
 
You aren't wrong. This entire conversation gets old, as all anyone wants is for Iowa to win. This site tracks overall team efficiency with different lineups on the floor.

EvanMiya CBB Analytics

Of the 5-man lineups this season Iowa has used with at least 50 possessions, the Garza/Bohannon/Frederick/Murray/Wieskamp lineup is by far the most efficient in adjusted efficiency margin. The second most efficient lineup is Iowa's starting lineup, so it's not as if that group is bad.

What is also interesting is the teammate chemistry, where the adjusted efficiency is measured when different sets of two teammates are on the floor together. I would encourage folks to look at it. If you go to the Team Breakdown tool and then both the 5-man lineups and the Teammate Chemistry you can see for yourself.

Fran has done a wonderful job with this team. Coaches get criticized all the time, but it's time to give credit where it's due here. I don't know how he did it, but he got this year's team to buy in on defense for the past month or so, and the results have been dramatic. It doesn't mean Iowa will make it out of the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. Stuff happens. But the team found defense, don't know how. But kudos to Fran.

With that said, when looking at all the regular and advanced stats I don't understand how Murray is not playing 25 minutes per game. I don't even really care who plays less so that he plays more (other than Garza) but he needs to play more. For all the blather here about how the "feeding the post" skill suddenly became the most important skill in all of basketball, the most efficient lineup Iowa has run out there all year involves Murray.

I a
And he still shoots it too much, I don't think he's hit a fg since early in Nebraska when he hit a 3 and Jess hilariously said hes a good shooter. I'm generally not seeing people say connor shouldn't play, I'm just in the camp that anywhere close to 30 mins, especially if keegan is only getting 15 is ridiculous.

They both can do things to help the team, I just think keegan does significantly more of those things and scoring and rebounding/loose balls is at the top of list. He's more disruptive on D too. Keegan making all frosh team proves his talents, connor ever making an all anything team is laughable. I agree with other poster who said having a 56 pct free thrower and generally poor shooter in late is going to cost us

There is no logic here and it's not just about scoring. It is about scoring, defense and rebounding. Last I checked those 3 things are pretty important in basketball. Keegan has the best shooting percentage on the team and shoots nearly 80% from the FT line. On a per 40 basis he's either number one or number two in rebounding, blocks and steals. He's not an assist guy but he is the best guy on the floor at protecting the inside when our perimeter players get beat. I don't agree however that everyone except Garza sb giving up the minutes. When Iowa is really clicking the inside/out game needs shooters on the floor to keep opposing defenses honest and maximize the outlet opportunities for Luka. JW, JB, and CJ all provide that. Connor doesn't. Connor is a good passer and is adept at feeding the post. There are at least 3 other people that can do that adequately but also possess other skills that contribute offensively and/or defensively in ways that Connor cannot. It's not a slam on Connor that so many on here seem to take it as. It's simply a fact that, on balance, Keegan is a far superior talent and should be getting the lion's share of those minutes.
 
Fran managed this season to Iowa's best winning % since 1987...

I guess you can post things that are not true or cherry pick to fit your agenda.
Alford 2005-2006, 25-9 is .735 winning percentage. Fran this year is 21-8 or .724.
Iowa ran off Alford with 2 BTT conference titles and similar B1G record.

Its taken Fran 11 years to compete for B1G title...which he did for 2/3 a season and he
ended up 3rd. It also took him 11 years to just reach a semi-final game in BTT., I'm okay with Fran but
would prefer if he improved. Whose idea was it to play zone for most of the season?

Fran is a 0.500 B!G, just an average coach at Iowa. There isn't a big difference B1G record wise between Davis post 87, Alford, or Fran.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bearhawk0505
Conner makes the offense work. Conner makes everyone else on the floor better.

Keegan is just good and seems to have a knack for coming up with the right play at just the right time. I'm not sure how you can say one is better than the other because both of their roles are pretty important.
I like Connor but agree that his minutes should go down and Murray's should go up. Having a guard that can't hit an open shot or get in the lane sometimes out weighs the good things he can do. Murray playing more minutes also makes us a better rebounding team and we certainly need to rebound better.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT