For the 4th time or so..I believed it was happening before the flick came out. Starting to embarrass yourself again. You ladies are too much work.
For the 4th time or so..I believed it was happening before the flick came out. Starting to embarrass yourself again. You ladies are too much work.
There is video evidence
Here is the article challenging that. I know it is from red state but at least read the contents and then form your opinion. One of the first things I read today was the AP fact checks on this movie
I don’t disagree with you but this evidence from Dinesh is interesting. Have you looked at the evidence?
From the OG 2000 Mules thread....
But don't bring him into it now..@wausauhawk , you are going too easy on him. The above is from JUST the first 2 pages. RN was all in.
But don't bring him into it now..
Who is this RNHawk homes?Once you are in a cult, you are always family....... Like the Marines, Branch Dividians, MS13, so is MAGA.
For the 4th time or so..I believed it was happening before the flick came out.
Unfortunate if true, and yes I believe there is still ballot harvesting going on mostly on the Dem side. Don't try to change my mind, no gotcha moment for me, sorry to disappoint ladies.
GOD bless you.Yes, conservatism is now a faith-based philosophy. You fervently believe all kinds of things on faith alone.
I didn't read all the bullshit you just wrote, at this point you are just writing for your BFs. It is your right.And you "believed" wrong.
60+ court cases where Trump's "lawyers" tossed around those claims, and they brought zero evidence to trial. They had >5 dozen chances to put up formal evidence, and they brought NOTHING.
Several of them are now losing their right to practice law over those false claims. Others are facing millions in defamation payments.
What does it take to get your brain to understand there's no relevant fraud to find? MOST of it has been Republicans voting illegally. Hell, the chair of the Colorado Republican Party was found guilty of voting using his GF's absentee ballot and got caught. They let him off easy, because he blamed a "diabetic episode". He got almost no penalty, when he should have spend 2-3 years in prison, because he clearly was intelligent enough he should have known better.
But he was white.
I didn't read all the bullshit you just wrote, at this point you are just writing for your BFs. It is your right.
BF #1, sorry you can't change my mind.You're in a cult, please seek help
Well, no shit. That's the defining characteristic of being in a cult. Faith "Trumps" reality.BF #1, sorry you can't change my mind.
BF #1, sorry you can't change my mind.
Allow me summarize to make sure I have it straight:BF #1, sorry you can't change my mind.
. Most of us will also rightly question your critical thinking skills since you cannot prove your belief and have no interest in changing it despite the overwhelming evidence that you are simply wrong.
I didn't read all the bullshit you just wrote
Willful ignorance.I didn't read all the bullshit you just wrote, at this point you are just writing for your BFs. It is your right.
Nothing more than I believe differently than what you believe.It is useless.
Some people can reach a place where they can admit they were conned; most are unable.
I'm not sure why anyone's arguing with him here - he's already said his beliefs on this topic aren't based on actual facts.Willful ignorance.
This is why the US judicial system is so critical in the era of Trump. It is the best forum yet devised by humans to determine the truth. The evidence is tested according to time tested rules of procedure and rules of evidence.I'm not sure why anyone's arguing with him here - he's already said his beliefs on this topic aren't based on actual facts.
Read? That's a good one.So I take you did not read the info in the link or look hard at that map?
Elapsed time is not a factor for election fraud. Tabulation takes time and with the technology currently in place it’s quite easy to demonstrate the integrity of the data time after time after time. The same results after each and every run through the machines with virtually zero variance in each set of results. The machines don’t lie and can be easily checked manually through a hand count however variances are generally higher when a human is tasked to tally the results. I love it when someone who has never worked an election tries to convince me that election fraud is so easily done. It’s not, and people like me who have worked many elections know that.Of course, days for counting votes opens the door for fraud. Needs to see how many votes are needed.
You work the states where it takes multiple days to count? TIAElapsed time is not a factor for election fraud. Tabulation takes time and with the technology currently in place it’s quite easy to demonstrate the integrity of the data time after time after time. The same results after each and every run through the machines with virtually zero variance in each set of results. The machines don’t lie and can be easily checked manually through a hand count however variances are generally higher when a human is tasked to tally the results. I love it when someone who has never worked an election tries to convince me that election fraud is so easily done. It’s not, and people like me who have worked many elections know that.
It takes multiple days largely because of the rules involved. Doesn’t mean there’s fraud. You know this, but want to believe there’s fraud regardless.You work the states where it takes multiple days to count? TIA
Thanks, didn't ask you, respectfully.It takes multiple days largely because of the rules involved. Doesn’t mean there’s fraud. You know this, but want to believe there’s fraud regardless.
That could be any state when the margin is close enough. It automatically triggers recounts which take time. Many counties and districts can’t afford enough equipment to run through the ballots quickly which exacerbates. Most recounts will also include manual tabulation which takes forever.You work the states where it takes multiple days to count? TIA
Do you still believe 200 Mules is accurate?You work the states where it takes multiple days to count? TIA
Thanks for the info, so no? Any insight to what happens after those state poll workers goes home for the evening?That could be any state when the margin is close enough. It automatically triggers recounts which take time. Many counties and districts can’t afford enough equipment to run through the ballots quickly which exacerbates. Most recounts will also include manual tabulation which takes forever.
Any insight to what happens after those state poll workers goes home for the evening?
Isn't true? You don't think it goes on outside of that flick?A person with a delusion believes something that isn't true no matter how much evidence you give to the contrary.
Sounds like @Ferentz_Fan just has Election Delusion, aka E.D. At least according to WebMD.
You're going to have to read the entire thread.Do you still believe 200 Mules is accurate?
TIA
Likely everything would be locked up including the tabulators. Already counted ballots would be bound with seals along with their count tapes. Uncounted ballots similarly would be bound to deter any tampering then unsealed the following day once the workers are ready to start running them through again. Naturally there will be different procedures from state to state as detailed in their procedural laws.Thanks for the info, so no? Any insight to what happens after those state poll workers goes home for the evening?
LOL - you're a pussy just like the rest of the right wing looneys who won't answer a simple, direct question. Thanks for proving that point.You're going to have to read the entire thread.
Isn't true? You don't think it goes on outside of that flick?
What evidence do you have it doesn't happen? Because of this flick?Systematic rampant fraud, box stuffing, and MIA boxes of ballots? No.
In fact, regardless of King Cheeto claiming it was bad, it has been deemed to be one of the most secure in our history. Just because he cannot accept another L, doesn't change that fact. His lost 62+ court cases and ZERO court cases showing rampant fraud are both also reasons to again say no. He has had 3 years to find evidence and start ANOTHER court case.
As stated, you think it is so, however, there is no evidence of rampant systematic fraud. There are certainly stories of 1 off events and bad individual actors, but no organized shenanigans to see here. Alternate facts do not sway me.
What EVIDENCE do you have to substantiate your belief?
I've answered it before, read the thread. Don't call me any of your wife's pets names for you stud.LOL - you're a pussy just like the rest of the right wing looneys who won't answer a simple, direct question. Thanks for proving that point.