ADVERTISEMENT

The tax returns are here! The tax returns are here!

I was referencing it because it was a joke that it was named that when everybody knew it did t do shot for inflation.
The Don't Say Gay bill on the other hand did a good job of shutting down any reference in schools to homosexuality. So "win" for your authoritarian.
 
For k through 3. Surely you don’t want to be talking about blowjobs with 2nd graders do you?
Why would you have to talk about blowjobs when discussing different sexual orientations? Do K-3 teachers talk about them when discussing traditional gender roles...or do you think straight people don't engage in that practice?

(pssst...straight people do butt-sex, too!!!)

In other words, you're an idiot.
 
Why would you have to talk about blowjobs when discussing different sexual orientations? Do K-3 teachers talk about them when discussing traditional gender roles...or do you think straight people don't engage in that practice?

(pssst...straight people do butt-sex, too!!!)

In other words, you're an idiot.
I’m pretty sure the gender role discussion and sex in general was normally off limits with kids that old.

Until you freaks got involved
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
I’m pretty sure the gender role discussion and sex in general was normally off limits with kids that old.

Until you freaks got involved
You mean they never discussed mommies and daddies in k-3 classrooms?!?!? o_O

You really shouldn't double down on that idiot stuff. It makes you look like...well...an idiot.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ihhawk
Are you really that naive? Or just desperately want to talk about sex with 8 year olds.
Keep digging.

fun-little.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Are you really that naive? Or just desperately want to talk about sex with 8 year olds.
I'm seriously interested...do you REALLY think they talked about sex with 8 year olds when they talked about mommy and daddy? Do you REALLY think they want to talk about sex when it's just daddy and daddy or mommy and mommy? Are you that f'n stupid?

Never mind...that question answers itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
I'm seriously interested...do you REALLY think they talked about sex with 8 year olds when they talked about mommy and daddy? Do you REALLY think they want to talk about sex when it's just daddy and daddy or mommy and mommy? Are you that f'n stupid?

Never mind...that question answers itself.
I’m pretty sure when the bill came out and the thread hit HROT, there were examples posted of schools and teachers going behind parents backs to have gender discussions with kids.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
I’m pretty sure when the bill came out and the thread hit HROT, there were examples posted of schools and teachers going behind parents backs to have gender discussions with kids.
So they were talking about buttsecks and BJ's?????

Idiot.
 
Nothing to dig. The bill was actually popular in the state…and Ron won re-election by 20 points.

Come live in Florida, it’s great. Just sad he won’t be our governor in 2025 but at least he will be our POTUS
FL is chock full of MAGAts (present company included) so I'll pass. Plus I like winter.
 
For k through 3. Surely you don’t want to be talking about blowjobs with 2nd graders do you?
In its preamble, the bill’s authors write that their aim is to prohibit “classroom discussion about sexual orientation or gender identity.” But later, the actual bill states that “classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur.”


The text states that teachings on sexual orientation or gender identity would be banned “in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.

Critics have said the language of this provision could open districts and educators to lawsuits from parents who believe any conversation about LGBTQ people or issues to be inappropriate, regardless of their child’s age.
 
I’m not a Trump fan, but I think the obsession over his taxes are ridiculous. I also don’t think anyone running for office should have an obligation to release their taxes if the law doesn’t require it.

Also, can we please move on from Trump? I’m so sick of him.
We cannot move on from him because he won't move on. We'll move on from him when he's dead. Even if he goes to prison he'll find a way to lash out through proxies, and still be a dangerous martyr.
 
I defend conservative positions. You and your ilk do your damndest to twist it into magatrump bullsqueeze every time. Have your DNC handlers up your game and get better scripts. It’s just old and becoming noise in the system.
In 2023 I hereby resolve to be very clear on my positions so that the retorts by you little bots trying to diminish my points are even more futile.
Trump is descending into full-on idiocy and is walking ever more closely to the edge of that cliff. I’m definitely not standing in his way.
In fact, the only people who do NOT want him to fall off are you lefties. You need that guy on the wall...dang where have I heard that before?
It's going to tear you up on the inside to be forced to vote for him in 2024.
 
It seems that way because when I criticize Team Red, which is quite often, I get almost zero pushback. I get a smattering of likes from Team Blue and then Northern or one of his buddies will call me a liberal and then that’s pretty much the end of it. When I criticize Team Blue, I’m immediately surrounded by about a dozen posters.

But let’s be clear about one thing here. I’m not “defending Team Red” in this thread. I’m criticizing Team Blue’s decision to release Trump’s returns, but in no way am I standing up for Trump. He’s a compulsive liar and a narcissistic grifter who cares only about what’s good for him.

As I have stated several times, I fully support the Court’s decision to grant Congress access to his returns so they can determine why the mandatory audits were not conducted and so they can review them for possible criminal activity. And if they find anything that indicates he broke the law then I support them prosecuting him by whatever legal means are available.

I hate Trump and I hate what he has done to the Republican Party and to America.
Find us a single 14 page thread where 6 pages of it are you relentlessly defending/muddying up the water to protect Team Blue.
Again, I like you, but be honest.
Edit: And for God's sake, don't use Northern supposedly criticizing you as an excuse. He's an idiot.
 
Last edited:
I have NEVER denied that I voted for him twice.
Are YOU trying to say that I’ve denied it or that I’ve stated on this board about 20 times that I do not support him now?
Holy smokes your HANDLERS are dumb!
Im not saying you denied voting for him. Im calling BS when you say you’re not a Trumper. How do you not understand yet? You’re either stupid or are misrepresenting what Im saying because you’re desperate to insult me.

You always end up defending Trump in these threads, you voted for the guy twice, yet still are brain dead enough to think you can convince anyone that you’re not a MAGAt. You’re a joke!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGHAWK
Lol - yes, I technically lost that bet but only because the person she called police on did not want to pursue it and she went through racial bias education.
You didn’t “technically” lose the bet. You just plain lost the bet. The terms were crystal clear. You were adamant that she was going to be convicted of a misdemeanor charge. It was an open and shut case in your mind. I knew there were other, more likely outcomes, including pretrial diversion.
If the guy wanted to press charges she absolutely would have been convicted. He was very gracious and wanted to drop it which I didn't count on at the time.
They didn’t need the birdwatcher’s cooperation in order to press charges. They had the video, they had the audio recording of the 911 calls, and they had a prosecutor who was hell-bent on making an example out of the woman against the backdrop of the George Floyd protests. You’re simply making excuses for losing the bet.
The really funny thing is you were arguing that the guy was threatening her and her dog by using, gasp, dog treats. You spent pages and pages trying to place the blame on him. It was an EPIC TJ thread where your arguments were destroyed over and over again. Not much has changed.
He was recording video of her without her consent and told her “I’m going to do what I want but you’re not going to like it.”

You always seem to forget that part. But I guarantee that if a stranger said that to your wife or daughter while recording video of her, you would damn sure consider it a threat.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
Find us a single 14 page thread where 6 pages of it are you relentlessly defending/muddying up the water to protect Team Blue.
Show me a thread where I criticized Team Red or supported Team Blue and immediately had 12 guys peppering me with responses from every angle. Because that happens almost every time I criticize Team Blue or defend Team Red.
Again, I like you, but be honest.
Edit: And for God's sake, don't use Northern supposedly criticizing you as an excuse. He's an idiot.
I didn’t use Northern as an excuse. You must have misread what I wrote. My point is that when I criticize Team Red, I don’t get any pushback except for maybe a little from Northern or someone like him. That’s why those threads never last long.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
You're not paying attention. Joe's reply to me about Trumps personal tax returns, was to post about the CFO going to prison and implying it was Trump's fault. This is 100% false and has zero bearing on the personal tax returns that were released showing Trump did nothing wrong there either. Joe is an idiot of epic proportions and here you are defending his stupidity because you hate Trump yourself. Trump's personal returns and his company returns are not the same, it cannot be argued otherwise. Trump has not been convicted of any tax crimes, that also cannot be argued otherwise.

"Allen Weisselberg, a senior adviser and former chief financial officer at the ex-president’s Trump Organization, said he conspired with a subordinate to hide more than a decade’s worth of extras from his taxable income, but that neither Trump nor the family were involved."


Oh freaking wow and trump wasn't aware. As usual an underling in the trump crime family took the hit for the boss.
 
You always seem to forget that part. But I guarantee that if a stranger said that to your wife or daughter while recording video of her, you would damn sure consider it a threat.
Don't have a daughter but my no-pic wife would never let our dog roam in an area where it's forbidden and then refuse to leash him when asked and then call the cops on the person who asked and falsely claim she was in fear for her life.


So there's that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Show me a thread where I criticized Team Red or supported Team Blue and immediately had 12 guys peppering me with responses from every angle. Because that happens almost every time I criticize Team Blue or defend Team Red.
Dude...you were wrong. Dead wrong. And you defended your wrongness over multiple pages - vehemently. I get it, it's what you do - hence the "TJ's gonna TJ" responses - but don't try to pretend it's just people piling on. You were wrong.
 
You didn’t “technically” lose the bet. You just plain lost the bet. The terms were crystal clear. You were adamant that she was going to be convicted of a misdemeanor charge. It was an open and shut case in your mind. I knew there were other, more likely outcomes, including pretrial diversion.

They didn’t need the birdwatcher’s cooperation in order to press charges. They had the video, they had the audio recording of the 911 calls, and they had a prosecutor who was hell-bent on making an example out of the woman against the backdrop of the George Floyd protests. You’re simply making excuses for losing the bet.

He was recording video of her without her consent and told her “I’m going to do what I want but you’re not going to like it.”

You always seem to forget that part. But I guarantee that if a stranger said that to your wife or daughter while recording video of her, you would damn sure consider it a threat.
You never fail to amuse. They dropped the case because he wasn't going to cooperate with them. Without that, they had no case. No excuses, I lost the bet and held up my end of it.

She is in public, he can record her. He didn't do anything threatening - she made that up and you bought it. You showed your ass in that thread like you have so often since. It continues to be fun watching you dance and spin and shift and dance...

You're farcical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGHAWK
So you're saying the CFO committed perjury? Is that right, Tom?
Maybe. I know Cohen went to prison for him and he has said multiple times that nothing get decided without Trump’s approval. Period. Trump is informed about everything that takes place in his business. You doubt him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed
Maybe. I know Cohen went to prison for him and he has said multiple times that nothing get decided without Trump’s approval. Period. Trump is informed about everything that takes place in his business. You doubt him?
Quite the charge without any evidence there, Tom. Also, I highly doubt Trump knew what each person in his company did with their own income. This is a garbage hypothesis.
 
Quite the charge without any evidence there, Tom. Also, I highly doubt Trump knew what each person in his company did with their own income. This is a garbage hypothesis.
Michael Cohen testified…under oath. Now do your boy Don.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT