Okay, Fran. LOL. You’ve been muddying this thread up for two days to protect Orange Jesus.Lol. Posting a link to federal law apparently is "Team Red".
Apparently “muddying this thread up” is code for “posting straight facts.”Okay, Fran. LOL. You’ve been muddying this thread up for two days to protect Orange Jesus.
So you’re on of the 3 people on earth who actually cared about Trumps tax returns?Do you wear velcro shoes?
What?So you’re on of the 3 people on earth who actually cared about Trumps tax returns?
And what exactly does releasing them to the public accomplish
The Senate cannot initiate any new tax laws to address it. That is the responsibility of the House of RepresentativesAre MAGAs taking over the Senate Finance Committee?
Can the general public initiate any new tax laws to address it? Because if not then your point is moot.The Senate cannot initiate any new tax laws to address it. That is the responsibility of the House of Representatives
The Ways and Means Committee didn’t request the returns so they can write new tax laws. They requested the returns so they can codify into the law IRS policy that requires additional scrutiny of the President’s returns. The Senate is fully capable of doing that.The Senate cannot initiate any new tax laws to address it. That is the responsibility of the House of Representatives
Can the general public initiate any new tax laws to address it?
Sure they did.The Ways and Means Committee didn’t request the returns so they can write new tax laws.
Your ability to rationalize horrible behaviors under the guise of doing what you feel everyone else is doing has a name.It lets We The People identify where the conflicts of interest were.
Before 2024
The Chinese bank accounts was made public in 2020. NYT investigated it. More than likely discussed on HROT at the timeI've learned two brand new things from this release. Trump has bank accounts in China and he lied about donating his salary. Both are major red flags the public deserves to know.
And now they are formally confirmed on his actual taxes.The Chinese bank accounts was made public in 2020. NYT investigated it.
It's not a random "citizen's" taxes.to actually want the government to set the precedent of publicly announcing a citizens taxes.
Thank you! The key is to be as accurate as possible. I don't always get it right but this time I nailed it.Nice framing.
That’s fantastic logic.Once again, Trump publicly and repeatedly pledged to release his taxes post-audit. That has been done.
“If I decide to run for office, I’ll produce my tax returns. Absolutely. I would love to do that,”
Trump May 2014
“I want to tell you right now I have no problem with giving my tax returns,”
Trump April 2015
There’s no issue here.
So it’s to help their fellow Democrats win elections, then. Thank you for confirming that this was strictly political and served no legal imperative.You mean "We The People", pressuring our representatives to act?
And deciding to elect ones that will, if the ones in office fail to do so?
He gave his consent…multiple times.That’s fantastic logic.
“Well, he said he was going to release them. Since he didn’t follow through on that promise, it’s perfectly okay for us to break the law and release his returns without his consent.”
How exactly does that work? Democratic candidates have all released their tax returns post-Watergate. As have all Republican candidates. How does the release of THESE tax returns “help…Democrats win elections”?So it’s to help their fellow Democrats win elections, then. Thank you for confirming that this was strictly political and served no legal imperative.
The level of stupid from you grows each and every time. He followed tax laws that everyone in his position follow you moron. It's not gaming. Everyone of those asshats in Congress are or would be doing the same thing. Your fearless leader, FJB, opened S Corps to evade taxes why aren't we seeing those? This enrichment argument is beyond stupid as well.Sure they did.
To identify how people like Trump are gaming the system AND to prevent this from happening again (where a President is allowed to enrich himself while in office, putting his own personal wealth before the interests of the United States and the people)
Would that evaluation have included an accounting as to how this POTUS abused the system?I’m still waiting for someone - anyone - to provide a reasonable explanation for why making them public was an integral part of evaluating the presidential audit process.
And how would THAT work given that the IRS was simply rubber-stamping his returns without asking for any documentation?This was always going to be a nothing burger. If he wasn't doing things right, the IRS would have already been fining him through the nose. You libtards are idiots.
Consent? He never gave consent to Congress to release his returns. Where in your quotes does he consent to do that? He said HE would release them, which is not consent for anyone else to do so. The precedent set with this SC decision isn't a good one.He gave his consent…multiple times.
By the House Ways and Means Committee? Yes.Would that evaluation have included an accounting as to how this POTUS abused the system?
You really think that how it works? Good lord.And how would THAT work given that the IRS was simply rubber-stamping his returns without asking for any documentation?
I'm just going to go ahead and assume that even you realize how completely fvcking stupid this comment was.He gave his consent…multiple times.
The level of stupid from you grows each and every time. He followed tax laws that everyone in his position follow you moron. It's not gaming. Everyone of those asshats in Congress are or would be doing the same thing. Your fearless leader, FJB, opened S Corps to evade taxes why aren't we seeing those? This enrichment argument is beyond stupid as well.
This was always going to be a nothing burger. If he wasn't doing things right, the IRS would have already been fining him through the nose. You libtards are idiots.
Oh please tell me where he didn't follow them? I'm sure you have the evidence to back this up after his returns have been released! WOW!He followed tax laws? I'm trying to think how on earth someone after the last 6 or 7 years of a twice impeached lying president could actually believe that. You need to open your eyes and your ears and be patient.
FixedBy the general public? Yep. That's what Trump himself stated, MANY times.
NoSo it’s to help their fellow Democrats win elections
No, he didn't.The level of stupid from you grows each and every time. He followed tax laws that everyone in his position follow
The report very clearly stated the Joint Committee on Taxation "did not have any investigatory powers." On page 1, the committee states: "we express no opinion regarding whether any adjustment, or increase or decrease in tax, would have resulted if these issues had been pursued on examination." This message is repeated throughout the nearly 40-page document.By the House Ways and Means Committee? Yes.
By the Senate Finance Committee? Also yes.
By the US Congress Joint Committee on Taxation? Again, yes.
By the general public? Not so much.
TJ gonna TJThe report very clearly stated the Joint Committee on Taxation "did not have any investigatory powers." On page 1, the committee states: "we express no opinion regarding whether any adjustment, or increase or decrease in tax, would have resulted if these issues had been pursued on examination." This message is repeated throughout the nearly 40-page document.
![]()
The IRS did not audit Trump during his presidency's first 2 years
The findings were announced after a Democratic-controlled committee voted to release a report related to former President Donald Trump's tax returns.www.npr.org
The Senate still has investigatory powers, yes?The report very clearly stated the Joint Committee on Taxation "did not have any investigatory powers." On page 1, the committee states: "we express no opinion regarding whether any adjustment, or increase or decrease in tax, would have resulted if these issues had been pursued on examination." This message is repeated throughout the nearly 40-page document.
![]()
The IRS did not audit Trump during his presidency's first 2 years
The findings were announced after a Democratic-controlled committee voted to release a report related to former President Donald Trump's tax returns.www.npr.org