Wrong. Its another attack on Ukraine. As has already been pointed out to you: collateral damage.
You can keep digging if you'd like, but you're simply wrong.
This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...
- Thread starter Nole Lou
- Start date
You can keep digging if you'd like, but you're simply wrong.
Did I not state that?
But when misguided missiles on non-military targets can stray into NATO territories, we are allowing the "security" of those border areas to be compromised, if those actions are not met with repercussions.
The simple answer here is for Russia to not send anything within >100 mi of NATO borders. Because NONE of those borders are currently near any active fighting front-lines.
Milley would get shredded on this board 😂😂
Russian stooge 😄
www.reuters.com
Russian stooge 😄
Top U.S. general plays down probability of near-term Ukraine military victory
The top U.S. general on Wednesday said Ukraine's chances of any near-term, outright military victory were not high, cautioning that Russia still had significant combat power inside Ukraine despite suffering battlefield setbacks since its invasion in February.
www.reuters.com
Disagree. An attack on collective security would have been a deliberate attack by Russia on Poland.
It's sad to see so many of our political and military leaders on Putin's payroll.Milley would get shredded on this board 😂😂
Russian stooge 😄
Top U.S. general plays down probability of near-term Ukraine military victory
The top U.S. general on Wednesday said Ukraine's chances of any near-term, outright military victory were not high, cautioning that Russia still had significant combat power inside Ukraine despite suffering battlefield setbacks since its invasion in February.
Nope, you didnt. You said its an attack on collective security. its not. Its collateral damage from an attack on Ukraine.
Seriously, just stop. You're drowning and for some reason, keep adding more weight to your shoes.
eh, I highly doubt the countries supporting Ukraine are going to get mad because he claims it was a Russian missile.
Of course he wants NATO involved. Ukranians are dying and their land is being mined which will kill people for years to come. The sooner Russia is repelled the better. While Ukraine will win the war, the loss of life is something it will take them several generations to recover from.No one?
“Hitting NATO territory with missiles…This is a Russian attack on collective security! This is a really significant escalation. Action is needed.”
Zelensky calls Russian missiles hitting Poland ‘really significant escalation’
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday called the death of two people in Poland from Russian missiles a “really significant escalation” of the war between Kyiv and Moscow. “Hitting NAT…thehill.com
Oh I don’t blame him for wanting to get NATO involved. He’s in a life and death struggle for his country.
I do think Ukraine/Zelensky have been fantastic rallying support for their cause but…I do think they have to be careful.
They (Ukraine) can’t be seen as trying to push NATO into active participation. One thing no NATO nation wants is escalation. Zelensky can’t be seen as a loose cannon in that regard.
They will if they think Ukraine is trying to pull NATO into the conflict. Already have some wavering support in NATO.
Does anyone know how far behind those daily trackers are? I keep waiting to see the results of the kherson storm, but those daylies have been pretty flat since then.
If they continue hits that land in NATO territory, it's most definitely impacting the "security" where that collateral damage occurs.
Again. Wrong.
And "they" didn't hit the land, Ukraine did. You can't even keep your own narrative straight at this point.
I would say OMG you guys who GAF, but you are contributing to the length of this thread and each post is worth 2 Russian KIAs so have at it.
That's the only reason I tolerate it when Joe and Bins French kiss each other for an entire page in this thread about who is the most wrong.
It’s mind blowing you think he’s sincere and not trolling.
JUST LIKE the examples I've provided for you on "friendly fire" in police standoffs.
Ukrainian missile never launches UNLESS there is a Russian missile targeting them. It is 100% Russia's responsibility, and NATO should treat it that way.
I think Milley is no longer on China's payroll, so he needed another enemy to work for.
I can read your posts just fine. You're just wrong.
Milley been spending too much time around the Flynn brothers.
"Russians shoot each other, they misunderstood think the other party is ukraine"
