ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

Ukraine signals a shift toward defense as analysts ask whether ‘failed counteroffensive’ is over.​

Ukraine signaled Monday that it is shifting its military tactics toward a more defensive footing after an analysis of Russia’s resource capabilities and as winter approaches.

Ukrainian presidential advisor Mykhailo Podolyak noted Monday that “on the front line and in the cities, we are already moving to a different tactic of warfare — effective defense in certain areas, continuation of offensive operations in other areas, special strategic operations on the Crimean peninsula and in the Black Sea waters, and significantly reformatted missile defense of critical infrastructure.”

Resources will be directed to increasing domestic arms production, he said, and speeding up negotiations with allies to increase equipment supplies for the “new stage” of Ukraine’s offensive operations, he said.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said last week that winter “as a whole is a new phase of war,” with freezing temperatures making fighting far more difficult and the defense of critical energy infrastructure far more of a priority. Zelenskyy also signaled last week that the fortification of all front lines needed to be accelerated.

The shift has prompted some analysts to question whether the change reflects that Ukraine’s counteroffensive, launched back in June but failing to make as much progress as hoped, is over.

Eurasia Group founder and president Ian Bremmer commented Monday that “Ukrainians have shifted to building defensive fortifications, putting an end to the failed counteroffensive.” Analysts at the Institute for the Study of War noted Saturday that “poor weather conditions continue to slow the pace of Ukrainian and Russian combat operations across the entire frontline but have not completely halted them.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: VodkaSam and h-hawk

Zelensky is losing popularity because of his mistakes, says mayor of Kyiv​

Mr Klitschko told two interviewers that he considered Mr Zelensky to be increasingly isolated and autocratic.

Volodymyr Zelensky’s popularity is falling and he will pay for his mistakes by eventually losing power, the mayor of Kyiv Vitali Klitschko has said.

In a startling rebuke of Ukraine’s president, Mr Klitschko told two interviewers that he considered Mr Zelensky to be increasingly isolated and autocratic.

“People see who’s effective and who’s not. And there were and still are a lot of expectations. Zelensky is paying for mistakes he has made,” he said in an interview with the Swiss news website 20 Minutes.

The former heavyweight boxing world champion who has been mayor of Kyiv since 2014 is a political adversary of Mr Zelensky, but his comments reflect growing dissatisfaction with the president after 21 months of war and a failed Nato-backed counteroffensive.

Support has fallen​

Opinion polls in Ukraine have shown that both support for fighting against Russia and for Mr Zelensky have fallen, although they are still above 60 per cent.

Mr Klitschko blamed Mr Zelensky for ignoring warnings about the Russian invasion in February 2022, failures which he said nearly allowed the Russian army to capture Kyiv.

“People wonder why we weren’t better prepared for this war. Why Zelensky denied until the end that it would come to this,” he said.

Mr Zelensky’s opponents have turned up the volume in recent weeks, accusing him of mishandling the counteroffensive, failing to stamp out corruption, dodging a presidential election scheduled for March and losing international political goodwill.

Time to end war​

Last month, Oleskiy Arestovych, Mr Zelensky’s former adviser, said that he wanted to challenge the Ukrainian Presidency and that it was now time to start talking to the Kremlin about ending the war.

Mr Zelensky has pledged never to negotiate with the Kremlin.

Mr Klitschko said he agreed with Ukraine’s military commander-in-chief, Valery Zaluzhny, that the war had become a stalemate. Maj Gen Zaluzhny’s comments, in an interview with the Economist, had angered Mr Zelensky, who advised his top brass to stick to fighting and stay out of politics.

“Sometimes people just don’t want to hear the truth,” Mr Klitschko said.

While Mr Klitschko said that Mr Zelensky would ultimately lose power, he clarified it was important not to switch presidents while Ukraine was still at war with Russia.

“The President has an important function today,” he said.

Mr Klitschko was a senior leader in the 2014 Maidan Revolution that overthrew a Kremlin-backed leadership and has been a strong supporter of Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s president between 2014-19. Mr Zelensky, a stand-up comedian before he entered politics, defeated Mr Poroshenko in the 2019 presidential election.

Mr Klitschko’s interview with 20 Minutes was published on Sunday within hours of a wide-ranging story in Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine on the war in Ukraine that also quoted him criticising Mr Zelensky.

Der Spiegel quoted Mr Klitschko as saying that Mr Zelensky has become isolated and that they never meet, even though their offices are only a few minutes walk apart.

‘Enormous pressure’​

He said that only the stubbornness and independence of regional mayors and governors were stopping Ukraine from becoming an autocratic state centred around Mr Zelensky.

“There is currently only one independent institution, but enormous pressure is being exerted on it: local self-government,” he said.

Mr Klitschko also credited local officials and not the central government with holding off Russian attacks in the first few weeks of the war.

As well as being the most senior city mayor in Ukraine, Mr Klitschko is the head of the Ukrainian League of Cities, a political grouping for city leaders.

He said that Kyiv was having to defend itself once again against waves of attacks by Russian drones which target the city’s energy and power infrastructure in what Ukrainian officials have said is a systematic Kremlin campaign to undermine civilian morale.

Mr Klitschko said that the city’s air defence systems shoot down most of the drones but Kyiv was also far more crowded this year, straining its infrastructure and resources.

“Last year, Kyiv was almost empty, now it’s packed. Many have returned, and we have almost half a million refugees here from all over the country,” he said.

Last year, Mr Klitschko had encouraged people to leave Kyiv and Ukraine over winter to lighten the pressure on its power and electricity generating capacities.

 
  • Like
Reactions: VodkaSam and h-hawk
Posted an article may moons ago :) that the political situation isn't as united as it seemed during the first year of the war. The knives were ready to come out by Zelensky's political opponents as soon as they had the opportunity.

I think it's going to be an interesting winter on that front. His opponents are going to try to use the currrent stalemate and growing war weariness to go after him.

Hopefully the guy can survive because I think the Churchill comparisons are pretty apt.

His efforts to eliminate corruption have created a lot of enemies I think....
 
Last edited:
Putin will travel to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Keep in mind he has charges pending from the International Criminal Court. Neither of our good allies are signatories to the ICC, but you’d think they’d arrest a brutal war criminal…
Is the US a member of the ICC?

The US is not a state party to the Rome Statute. The US participated in the negotiations that led to the creation of the court. However, in 1998 the US was one of only seven countries – along with China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, and Yemen – that voted against the Rome Statute. US President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute in 2000 but did not submit the treaty to the Senate for ratification. In 2002, President George W. Bush effectively “unsigned” the treaty, sending a note to the United Nations secretary-general that the US no longer intended to ratify the treaty and that it did not have any obligations toward it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
GAlpf21WUAAb3kL



 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD and Torg
"One of the stages of disarmament, which started the chain of war of Russia against Ukraine.On December 5, 1998, Ukraine and the United States signed an agreement on the elimination of 44 Ukrainian heavy bombers and 1,068 Kh-55 cruise missiles."

 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD
Posted an article may moons ago :) that the political situation isn't as united as it seemed during the first year of the war. The knives were ready to come out by Zelensky's political opponents as soon as they had the opportunity.

I think it's going to be an interesting winter on that front. His opponents are going to try to use the currrent stalemate and growing war weariness to go after him.

Hopefully the guy can survive because I think the Churchill comparisons are pretty apt.

His efforts to eliminate corruption have created a lot of enemies I think....
Putin has a long winter ahead of him, too. His economy is wobbling, and he becomes more extreme at home in order to convince his citizens that they don't actually see Ukrainian drones in the skies.
 
"IMARS arrives in a convoy from the Soviet Union Just a huge number of Russian deaths"



"New video from #Stepove . In this video you can see helicopters and tanks firing at Russian positions, north of the front of #Avdiivka"


 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD and MitchLL



The "Blame Ukraine" Narrative Has Arrived in Full

We did not give them what they asked for and needed, and now we throw them under the bus for attempting an operation we would never do​


Sending out an early midweek update to all subscribers—partly out of anger at the way certain US sources are throwing Ukraine under the bus to save their reputations. I will send another update for paid subcribers later in the week—however, the story in the Washington Post today about the Ukrainian counteroffensive was such a blatant attempt by some (anonymous, always anonymous) people in the US government to blame Ukraine for the counteroffensive failing to brake through Russian lines. Here is a link.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...counteroffensive-stalled-russia-war-defenses/

Readers of this substack might remember on October 8 I wrote a piece predicting that this exact narrative was about to come out to try and protect the reputation of those who failed to arm Ukraine properly and who have constantly failed to understand this war. What I wrote was:
During some recent travels I actually heard the anti-Ukraine narrative that is being developed by some analysts, particularly those who drastically overrated Russian military strength before Feb 24, 2022. Here is their narrative, which I think you can expect to hear publicly more and more:
Overall the view will be from the analysts who have been second guessing Ukraine that Ukraine had a great opportunity in the counteroffensive, but blew it because of their own mistakes and major Russian military improvements. The Ukrainians started the counteroffensive in a slip-shod way in early June, by launching the major effort without probing and stumbling into a well-prepared Russian kill zone. At that point the Ukrainians made too hasty a decision to abandon NATO combined arms tactics, and instead moved to the slow, attritional war that we have seen. This was a disaster, and now the war is favoring Russia, who is gearing up its war industries and will be gaining the upper hand in the coming months. Ultimately you will hear the analysts say that while they support Ukraine, the war is basically a stalemate that concessions should now be made for Russia to have a peace deal.
This narrative is coming.
It was in this substack.

The article starts with exactly that criticism above—Ukraine starts the attack, gets worried about losses, and moves away (foolishly) from the way NATO/US sources wanted them to fight. Here is a quote near the start:

Rather than try to breach Russian defenses with a massed, mechanized attack and supporting artillery fire, as his American counterparts had advised, Zaluzhny decided that Ukrainian soldiers would go on foot in small groups of about 10 — a process that would save equipment and lives but would be much slower.
Months of planning with the United States was tossed aside on that fourth day, and the already delayed counteroffensive, designed to reach the Sea of Azov within two to three months, ground to a near-halt.

If this article is anything to go by, the “blame Ukraine” narrative is even worse than expected. The article included all the canards that anonymous sources have been letting out here and there for a while; Ukraine was too casualty averse, Ukraine did not use western equipment properly, Ukraine did not stick with the offensive long enough, Ukrainian soldiers weren’t well prepared by their own side. On the other hand, we are told that Pentagon war gamers (btw these are the same people that had Kyiv falling in a few days, or Russia seizing the Baltic states against all of NATO in 24 hours) did some games and were sure Ukraine would triumph.

The article is a disgrace, and reveals how little people have learned from this war, how low the US has sunk as a friend and ally (at least from these sources).

What does the article not do?

First, Passes over the lack of Ukrainian air power beyond one quick mention. Its fascinating how this line was thrown in—and then afterwards the anonymous sources continue to say the lack of a breakthrough was Ukraine’s fault.

If this were the United States or NATO, the operation also would have included devastating air power to weaken the enemy and protect troops on the ground, but the Ukrainians would have to make do with little or none.

The cowardice of not going into this in detail, but then pivoting and blaming the Ukrainians is breathtaking. The last 3 times the US armed forces went into combat for a campaign without air superiority were:
The Philippines 1942 (largest surrender of US forces outside of the US Civil War)

Guadalcanal 1942-1943, (First months of the battle, US forces dont have air supremacy and have to hold on)
Battle of the Bulge, December 1944, (first few days, US has no air supremacy because of weather, Much of the 106th division surrenders, second largest surrender of US forces outside of the Civil War).
The US has fought with overwhelming air superiority in every campaign since, and yet we are supposed to believe that Ukraine is to blame for failing to breakthrough a well-defended defensive line with equipment they had just been given?

Second: The Ukrainians understood this war better than we did. One of the shocking parts of the story is the fact that US training originally did not include much UAV interaction, because the US did not include them in the curriculum. It took the Ukrainians to add them to the training, over US objections.

Some of the Ukrainian soldiers thought the American trainers didn’t grasp the scale of the conflict against a more powerful enemy. “The presence of a huge number of drones, fortifications, minefields and so on were not taken into account,” said a soldier in the 47th with the call sign Joker. Ukrainian soldiers brought their own drones to help hone their skills, he said, but trainers initially rebuffed the request to integrate them because the training programs were predetermined. Drone use was later added following Ukrainian feedback, a U.S. official said.


 
Third: We didnt actually give Ukraine what it asked for—either enough ground equipment, or the desperately needed ranged weaponry such as ATACMS that the Ukrainians have been asking for since early 2022. The section on ATACMS is particularly disingenuous.

The final key decision on weapons transfers came in September, when the administration agreed to provide a variant of the Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS. The missiles were not the deep-strike variant Kyiv had requested, with the United States instead opting for a shorter-range weapon that drops cluster submunitions.
While useful, Ukrainian officials said, neither the ATACMS launchers nor the cluster weapons have broken the battlefield deadlock.

So the ATAMCS launchers have not “broken the battlefield deadlock”. This is the only mention and its particularly egregious. ATACMS were provided in very small numbers (maybe 20) and of the shorter range variety. And they were not used until mid October—when they showed their great worth instantly.
A handful of ATACMS (where are the follow up attacks—that tells you all you need to know about how few were given), were never going to break the battlefield deadlock. They needed to come in much larger numbers and not be kept from being used more than four months after the counterattack started.

These are just three criticisms of this terrible ass-covering exercise by anonymous Pentagon officials. I also want to say this—its embarassing that the US would do this to a country fighting for its life. That this has become a reputation salvaging exercise, instead of an exercise to help Ukraine is a sign of a moral failure in the heart of the US DOD.

This does not educate the public (it distorts the reality of war), nor does not help Ukraine (it will if anything provide fodder to those in Congress who want to strip aid to Ukraine). Its impact, if anything, will be to make the war longer and bloodier.

It also keeps the US from having to face up to the reality of its own shortcomings.

It stinks—just be warned, more are coming.
 
"One of the stages of disarmament, which started the chain of war of Russia against Ukraine.On December 5, 1998, Ukraine and the United States signed an agreement on the elimination of 44 Ukrainian heavy bombers and 1,068 Kh-55 cruise missiles."

Context: This was stuff the Ukrainians couldn’t even afford to maintain.
We spent money (Nunn-Lugar) to make sure it was destroyed and eliminate nuclear proliferation risk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
I lean left but America also needs border security and some sort of compromise should be accepted. Neither party should be playing politics with Ukraine and our border security but that is exactly what both are doing.
Until the US heavily Fines and/or jails repeat offenders of hiring of undocumented. That currently plead ignorance or use employment firms as scapegoats. It’s hard to reduce the pressure on the border. If we really want to build an effective border wall. It should be in Southern Mexico where the influx of people are coming from.
 
If this were the United States or NATO, the operation also would have included devastating air power to weaken the enemy and protect troops on the ground, but the Ukrainians would have to make do with little or none.

Second: The Ukrainians understood this war better than we did. One of the shocking parts of the story is the fact that US training originally did not include much UAV interaction, because the US did not include them in the curriculum. It took the Ukrainians to add them to the training, over US objections.

Some of the Ukrainian soldiers thought the American trainers didn’t grasp the scale of the conflict against a more powerful enemy. “The presence of a huge number of drones, fortifications, minefields and so on were not taken into account,” said a soldier in the 47th with the call sign Joker. Ukrainian soldiers brought their own drones to help hone their skills, he said, but trainers initially rebuffed the request to integrate them because the training programs were predetermined. Drone use was later added following Ukrainian feedback, a U.S. official said.
There was a story out in the German press about the Ukrainians pressing their trainers for drone utilization, and it was explained too much red tape involved to get the flight clearances.
Hard to describe that effort as even semi-serious.
They brought up minefields, and were told, "go around them."

The air power thing is true, it's why we're on our own tier, but I think it likely a stretch to contend 'NATO' air power would be devastating absent the U.S.

Read a book like A-10s Over Kosovo and you'll learn our pace of operations is unparalleled, never mind the breadth (SEAD and tankers) and depth of equipment we have. We have a significant multiple of what they can field, and we train and operate to use it more times a day.

They play war, the U.S. lives it.

sHX2vDr.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
Captured Bradley.



Looks like a mobility kill to me.
Of particular note: Not burned inside, no blood inside.
Looks like the vehicle actually did its job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
On Tuesday Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky unexpectedly canceled at the last minute a planned appearance via video link before US Senators mulling an emergency aid package containing over $60 billion for Kiev.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was the one to announce it to reporters: "Zelensky by the way could not make it to -- something happened at the last minute -- to our briefing," Schumer said.

With just weeks to go before Ukraine aid stops flowing, and amid a row in Congress which threatens to discontinue the war funding, Ukraine is now saying it will lose the war if it can't access more US funds and weaponry.

Zelensky's chief of staff issued the words Tuesday:

If the United States postpones military aid to Ukraine, there is a “big risk” the country could lose its war with Russia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s chief of staff Andriy Yermak said Tuesday.
Speaking at the U.S. Institute for Peace during a visit to Washington, Yermak said failure by Congress to approve more aid to Ukraine could make it “impossible” to liberate more territory captured by Russia and “give the big risk to lose this war.”
“If the help which (is) now debating in Congress will be just postponed. ... It gives the big risk that we can be in same position (where) we’re located now,” said Yermak, speaking in English.
“That is why it is extremely critically important that this support will be voted and will be voted as soon as possible,” he said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
Putin is trying to run a wartime economy while convincing his people all is well. It isn't sustainable.

Nothing's ever well for the Russian people, comparatively. It's just varying degrees of bad.

We're past the point of saying it's not sustainable......it is. Their weapons aren't effective, but they have a lot of them. Their soldiers have a high casualty rate, but they don't care because they have a seemingly endless supply of them that end up at the front. We've imposed sanctions, but international companies changed their names and still operate within Russia. The western public doesn't care enough to boycott because there's really no skin in the game. The ruble is worthless. So what? It works in Russia.

This is a country that sent millions of its own people to work camps in Siberia for a generation to stifle opposition.......they don't give a shit, the ends justify the means
 
Border security would be a win/win concession by D's IMO. Get Ukraine aid and maybe the border situation is better for the 2024 election...take it off the table for R talking pts.


The Senate is expected to hold a vote Wednesday in an effort to advance aid to Ukraine and Israel, but Republicans appear poised to block the move as a result of a clash over border security.

Senate Republicans have insisted that the foreign aid must be paired with major border security policy changes, and while there have been bipartisan talks to try to find consensus, the two sides remain far apart. It’s not clear whether an agreement can be reached over the contentious issue, a critical sticking point that threatens to derail passage of the aid package.

The stalemate comes amid Israel’s war against Hamas and Ukraine’s war against Russian aggression. The White House issued a dire warning earlier this week that funding for Ukraine is running out and failure to secure an agreement to approve further aid will present critical national security risks.


A number of Republicans have said they believe Wednesday’s procedural vote will fail, and that rejecting it will demonstrate how serious they are about their border policy demands.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, has said that he wants the Senate to pass a comprehensive package that deals with Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, but has encouraged his members to vote “no” on the procedural motion to send a message to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

aHR0cHM6Ly9hc3NldHMuYm91bmNlZXhjaGFuZ2UuY29tL2Fzc2V0cy91cGxvYWRzL2NsaWVudHMvMTY4Mi9hZHMvZTBkZDJhY2QzNTc0Njc5ODY0Y2Q3Njk2NWFhNWRjZTIucG5n



At a news conference on Tuesday, McConnell said, “My advice to the majority leader last week was: ‘If you don’t believe how serious we are about this, then file cloture.’ And so I’m advocating, and I hope, all of our members vote ‘no’ on the motion to proceed to the shell to make the point, hopefully for the final time, that we insist on meaningful changes to the border.”

“Now is the time to pay attention to our own border in addition to these other important international concerns,” he said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has also stressed the importance of border security. “Any national security package has to begin with the security of our own border,” he said at a news conference Tuesday.

“We have to effect real policy change at the border. And that is a necessary condition to anything we do going forward,” he said.

 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk

In Ukraine war arms race, US stalls as Israel, Turkey and South Korea surge​

Countries with weapons industries already working at full tilt have picked up a lot of early defense contracts.

The West has pledged to do whatever it takes to support Ukraine while also returning militaries to a war-ready status, but it is defense contractors in South Korea, Turkey and Israel which are reaping many of the early deals.

Arms makers in those countries, where governments sustain military investment and production pipelines to maintain their own security, made early gains in the months following the February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia, according to the latest analysis of weapon sales and military services revenue from the world’s top 100 contractors carried out by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

“South Korea, Israel, Turkey are countries that stand out as being able to respond to the increased expenditure,” said Lucie Béraud-Sudreau, who helped compile the data for SIPRI as part of an annual update that’s been ongoing since the end of the Cold War.

Turkey's four largest defense companies saw their 2022 revenues rise by 22 percent to $5.5 billion compared to 2021, with the standout being drone-maker Baykar.

The aggregate arms revenues of the three Israeli companies in the SIPRI ranking reached $12.4 billion in 2022, a 6.5 percent increase compared with 2021.

The combined arms revenues of the four South Korean companies in the ranking fell by 0.9 percent, primarily due to an 8.5 percent drop recorded by the country’s biggest arms producer, Hanwha Aerospace; but South Korean companies are likely to see a surge in revenues this year due to huge orders with Poland and the United Arab Emirates.

Poland, a frontier state with Ukraine, has lodged massive orders with South Korean arms producers for K2 Black Panther tanks, K9 self-propelled howitzers and FA-50 fighter planes (not all of which are yet visible in SIPRI's 2022 data, but should factor in this year). Warsaw traditionally looked to the U.S. for its big arms deals, but turned to South Korea because it was able to fill orders faster than backlogged U.S. companies.

In a signing ceremony last year, Polish Defense Minister Mariusz Błaszczak explained that “unfortunately due to limited industrial capabilities, it will not be possible for the equipment to be delivered in a satisfactory timeframe. Therefore, we started talks with South Korea — our proven partner.”

The three countries are swinging into an early lead because their arms factories are already on war-ready footings.

“Those are countries in a specific context that need their industries to be reactive,” said Béraud-Sudreau. “Also they are producing the stuff that’s in demand like artillery, drones.”

While U.S.-based titans Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Boeing remain at the top of SIPRI’s list, arms revenues for all three declined in 2022, while the figures for Northrup and U.K.-based BAE Systems only slightly increased.

The arms revenues of the 42 largest U.S. defense companies fell by 7.9 percent to $302 billion in 2022.

"We are beginning to see an influx of new orders linked to the war in Ukraine and some major U.S. companies, including Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies, received new orders as a result," said Nan Tian, a SIPRI senior researcher. "However, because of these companies’ existing order backlogs and difficulties in ramping up production capacity, the revenue from these orders will probably only be reflected in company accounts in two to three years’ time."

Meanwhile, in Europe, the likes of MBDA and Leonardo also saw arms revenue declines last year.

"Many arms companies faced obstacles in adjusting to production for high-intensity warfare," said Béraud-Sudreau. "However, new contracts were signed, notably for ammunition, which could be expected to translate into higher revenue in 2023 and beyond."


She added that weapons makers in the U.S. and Europe did receive a lot of new orders, but were unable to significantly ramp up production capacity because of labor shortages, soaring costs and supply chain difficulties.

The EU is currently in the midst of an intense debate over how to boost its defense production, and how to ensure that both national and European Union funds go to domestic companies rather than to foreign suppliers.

“Poland buys from South Korea, Estonia buys from Turkey, and we are not able to really have European products for our armed forces,” said Riho Terras, an Estonian MEP from the European People's Party who was commander of the national army until 2018.

“That is something that we need to focus on, otherwise we will lose the competition against, especially, South Korea,” he told POLITICO earlier this year.

While the revenues of U.S. and European arms companies stuttered due to the transition to wartime production aimed at both supplying Ukraine and also building up national stocks, the big loser was Russia, whose defense companies have seen their revenues shrivel.

The Kremlin is not very forthcoming about defense sector data, so SIPRI only has two Russian companies in its ranking, but their combined arms revenues fell by 12 percent to $20.8 billion.

Béraud-Sudreau said the best guess is that Russian arms makers are still signing massive contracts to supply the Kremlin's war effort, but that government payments are deferred so contractors are instead drawing on bank loans to cover costs.



 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT