Which means you don’t understand how badly they want immigration limits ignored.I don't understand the resistance...
More important than whatever constitutes ‘victory’ in Ukraine, we’ll see.
Which means you don’t understand how badly they want immigration limits ignored.I don't understand the resistance...
I don't think that's it actually.Which means you don’t understand how badly they want immigration limits ignored.
More important than whatever constitutes ‘victory’ in Ukraine, we’ll see.
"Nothing can prevent the development of our friendly relations," Putin told MbS, and invited him to visit Moscow in return.
"It is very important for all of us to exchange information and assessments with you on what is happening in the region. Our meeting is certainly timely," Putin said.
Below is the moment of Putin's being received and welcomed by a glowing MbS, ironically at the very moment President Biden gave a White House speech bemoaning the inability of Congress to pass Ukraine defense funding, which runs out in three weeks...
As Deutsche Welle reviews, the discussions likely centered on the planned OPEC+ output cuts and the Gaza War and regional crisis in the wake of the Oct.7 Hamas attack:
Prior to his arrival in Saudi Arabia, Putin's visit to neighboring UAE also had much fanfare. This is a man still under a Hague-based ICC warrant — but you would never guess it based on the below impressive state reception...
I'm not going to hijack the thread with a discussion on the border, but here's the situation. D's want A. R's want A and B. R's say there will be no A without B. That's not compromise, that's hostage-taking. It would be a compromise if R's DIDN'T want A, and were willing to accept A to get B.Nope. It's been pretty transparent for a few weeks now R's wanted border security tied to the bill. A compromise should have been reached....there wasn't even much of an attempt at it. If Ukraine aid is important it should have been a priority to get a deal done.
Actually it's politics as usual when the other party controls one of the legislative bodies.I'm not going to hijack the thread with a discussion on the border, but here's the situation. D's want A. R's want A and B. R's say there will be no A without B. That's not compromise, that's hostage-taking. It would be a compromise if R's DIDN'T want A, and were willing to accept A to get B.
Sure, you compromise in legislation on how to adjust retirement plan rules, or infrastructure. These things aren't really related, and, you don't see anyone saying lets hold aid to Israel hostage over border security. The border security that R's have had a decade to compromise over. Putting a gun to the head of a nation fighting for their existence isn't compromise.Honestly, just ****in compromise. That’s the way legislation is supposed to work.
The border should be a stand-alone issue as it's too big and has nothing to do with the other two countries. And since when have the Repubs EVER wanted to compromise/negotiate?Border security seems like a reasonable compromise to get the aid packages done. Win/win.
If border security is in the bill it'll pass.The border should be a stand-alone issue as it's too big and has nothing to do with the other two countries. And since when have the Repubs EVER wanted to compromise/negotiate?
It would only pass if the R's got everything they want. The border is too big to be tucked in with something else.If border security is in the bill it'll pass.
If we're talking "stand alone" bills, both parties have been packing in unrelated crap into bills for quite some time now...nothing new.
Maybe. I think in the end Joe/Schumer/D's will cut the deal.It would only pass if the R's got everything they want. The border is too big to be tucked in with something else.
Edit-may be a more likely description.
I only laughed at that because you are just now figuring that out when it's not new news at all.
This makes me wonder what countries in the world have the actual capacity to wage war. Not band together in a large coalition, and give a little bit, or go into porcupine mode and be too painful to swallow. But if shit got real and your allies abandoned you, you could you go it alone or with maybe one other country as a ride or die, and take out another country.
Stop believing liars and spin doctors. I know it is hard.Not sure this is how go about securing more aid…
Not sure this is how go about securing more aid…
250 155 mm shells??!!
The inability of the US/NATO to ramp up 155 MM production sufficiently is one of the more perplexing issues of this war....250 155 mm shells??!!
So that's like, what, an hour's worth?
To be fair, the world would be a much better place if no country had the ability to wage war of the scale you're talking about on their own. Not possible today when there are several countries that don't want to fall in line with the rest of the world in peace.This makes me wonder what countries in the world have the actual capacity to wage war. Not band together in a large coalition, and give a little bit, or go into porcupine mode and be too painful to swallow. But if shit got real and your allies abandoned you, you could you go it alone or with maybe one other country as a ride or die, and take out another country.
I think a wake up call has been served to the Western European members but we'll see.Honestly, I give a lot more credit to most of the former Warsaw Pact countries that are now NATO allies in being more prepared than the original Western European NATO members.