Stuff like this almost isn’t fair. I wonder what the United States counter measure is to something like this.
Man u are one dumb MF.
She sure likes attention.
While that may be true, I am a first time BMW buyer (2018 X5), and this vehicle is way better than my old 2016 Cadillac SRX.
She is DEAD CHILD wrong
"Starstreak’s lightweight 14kg missile has a claimed operational range of more than 7km, with Thales stating that the precision weapons has “low collateral damage”.
inews.co.uk
The Russian population supports Putin. That’s the point.
Can someone slap her upside the head?
Uhhhh..... I get it that he is fighting an uphill battle but "how much longer is the world going to ignore and be an accomplice"? Go **** yourself bud. We are trying to avoid a world War while sneaking you tech your country wouldn't have in 100 years on your own.
The stupidity of this is beyond belief. No one in the west is buying Russian oil as it is.
I’m sure the current X5 is nicer to drive and easier to live with than the e53. That’s probably because BMW caters to what their customers want, and not what impractical cranks on HROT are nostalgic for.
Looked to me like they stopped because they saw the armored vehicle coming. Regardless, pretty reprehensible.
If they delete the sun roof and add a cupola for an HK MG4 they could export a few more to Ukraine.
That looks like me in Hawaii several years ago chasing chickens on North Shore because others were.
LOL. Good to see your true colors coming through.
I agree with Whiskey on that take.
I’m kind of nearing the point where the United States and NATO needs to step in, whether that triggers WWIII or not.
That’s ridiculous, and I’m a pretty liberal democrat. But harming the Russian people is EXACTLY THE POINT now.
I think we draw the line on whatever starts WW3 haha. I think if we stay the course the damage inflicted by these sanctions will make a regime change in Russia.
I actually disagree on this. First, there seems to have been some progress, if inconsistent, on humanitarian evacuations. Second, the parties' public statements reflect very incremental softening so you want to give at least the current round of talks some chance of achieving something. (But probably not much time, as I'd assume the Russians will start up in full force immediately at the conclusion.) Third, between where we are now and no fly or stronger nato intervention, there are still a couple of materiel assistance steps, including more/more sophisticated ground based air defensive systems. As much as we'd all love to see convoys get shot up more, the reality is that the chief danger posed by the russian forces at the moment is from the air.
This. Like my tort law professor told us, there comes a point where the intervening criminal conduct of a third party negates whatever civil wrongs, real or perceived, may have been committed against it.
newrepublic.com
We don't need to "declare war on Russia"
