Purdue looked rusty and undisciplined with all the turnovers and penalties but I think they have a better outlook than NW this season. Their RB looks solid.
He fine, just a bleeding zit.Was there ever a report about the Purdue injury for the young man was bleeding?
Any puss?He fine, just a bleeding zit.
Typical play when you're a tough guy. No brains when it comes to fighting. Most linemen do this. He just did it at the wrong time...What a bonehead move
Yea about a tblspun then bled profusely.Any puss?
Northwestern's DL is usually pretty good - the fact that they were usually so staunch against the run tells me that the DL is okay. It also tells me that the PU OL isn't as bad as you're saying ... because the PU QB had enough time to throw on most occasions.There's no other school that gets these calls outside of NW. And it's not just the calls they get, but also the calls they don't ... like that incredibly obvious offensive PI call that was ignored. It is baffling. NW is the dirtiest team in the Big Ten - nobody tackles the head more than they do, nobody takes as many hits out of bounds as them. The offsetting penalty with the illegal formation was criminal. NW always seems to get the benefit on calls.
Some observations from today:
PU has a terrible OL
NW has a terrible OL
PU has troubles on the DL
NW has a poor DL
Five words you never seem to hear during an NW game are: "Paddy Fisher with the tackle"
Neither team looked like a contender tonight
Physical teams will dominate both lines from PU and NW
Northwestern's DL is usually pretty good - the fact that they were usually so staunch against the run tells me that the DL is okay. It also tells me that the PU OL isn't as bad as you're saying ... because the PU QB had enough time to throw on most occasions.
Both teams were a little weaker in the secondary. Both teams tightened things up in the 2nd half (in term of coverage) ... and then the scoring flowed more like a trickle.
PU still has a lot of work to do in order to be more consistent against the run. Larkin was able to gash them for big run after big run.
PU quarterbacks still have to be a little bit more careful about throwing the ball when things break down. Most of the picks were when the QB was either trying to force something OR when the ball was coming out a little late.
Purdue got the majority of their rushing yards on only 2 plays (1 run by Moore and 1 run by Knox). The bigger issue that Northwestern had in the game was contending with Purdue's "speed guys." They were taking some poor angles.This was a typical NW defense, that is, one capable of giving up a lot of points and one that can be manhandled. Purdue didn’t have much trouble moving the ball and I bet they out rushed NW. They just seemed to continually shoot themselves in the foot with bonehead turnovers, untimely penalties, or missed plays.
NW did two things better than PU: they tackled better and their QBs protected the ball. This was the difference in the game. PU time and time again had guys in position to make plays on defense only to blow the tackle. NW were at least able to get guys down when they got to the ball. The PU starting QB (my guess he’s not starting anymore) also has to learn to either throw the ball away or just take the sack.
Northwestern is not unlike Iowa ... they always look a little rough around the edges at the beginning of the seasonWasn't impressed with Northwestern but it is only week one. Purdue's defense is not good and they couldn't score in the second half. Thorson doesn't look all the way back yet. Purdue has some speed on offense!
Throw out Wis. and its going to be a dog fight.Wild Wild West... wow.. good game though!
Northwestern is not unlike Iowa ... they always look a little rough around the edges at the beginning of the season
The biggest knock I could see about Northwestern is twofold:
- Thorson's mobility really is limited still. That negatively impacts the dimensionality of their O when he is at the helm. This is why they were so willing to rotate Green in at QB. Initially the move seemed awfully perplexing ... but as the game advanced, it ended up making a lot more sense.
- When Purdue started playing with less cushion - Northwestern's WRs started having much more trouble getting open. That ended up leading to far fewer completions.
Sure ... and that plays with what was mentioned about a "pitch count" for Thorson. However, when Purdue started playing tighter coverage ... the Northwestern O stagnated, even with Thorson at the helm. Thus, it was a limitation having him in at the helm. It benefited the O a little more to have Green's added element of mobility.Just a note: with regard to Thorson rotating. The NW doctors told Fitzgerald that he should only play a certain amount of the game.
Sure ... and that plays with what was mentioned about a "pitch count" for Thorson. However, when Purdue started playing tighter coverage ... the Northwestern O stagnated, even with Thorson at the helm. Thus, it was a limitation having him in at the helm. It benefited the O a little more to have Green's added element of mobility.
That makes sense ... but they were still similarly limited last year ... and they still won a ton of games. Of course, Thorson was also able to flash mobility as a threat ... and that could sometimes force defenders to break off coverage, and then he'd be able to find somebody open.I don't know if you watched the Northwestern fall camp on BTN but lack of WR threat was one of the things mentioned by the crew if I remember correctly.
There's no other school that gets these calls outside of NW. And it's not just the calls they get, but also the calls they don't ... like that incredibly obvious offensive PI call that was ignored. It is baffling. NW is the dirtiest team in the Big Ten - nobody tackles the head more than they do, nobody takes as many hits out of bounds as them. The offsetting penalty with the illegal formation was criminal. NW always seems to get the benefit on calls....
Purdue will be the better team by mid-season,.... Northwestern is lucky to have played these guys early....
This was a typical NW defense, that is, one capable of giving up a lot of points and one that can be manhandled.
He doesn't have spectacular talent to work with, but his guys play hard and don't make many mistakes. The mistakes (and lack thereof) were the difference last night.Really impressed with Fitz. Takes a special kind of coach to win at NWestern and he's winning a lot.
For the most part, the Northwestern D played okay ... but they gave up too many big plays. I didn't expect to see that in the game. They should have expected that from Knox. However, I understand them not knowing what they'd get from Moore.Maybe, but so much can change from Game 1 to later it's hard to say for sure. Both teams had all of camp to prepare for what the opponent was going to do. And it showed. Everyone comes in at full strength, no tired legs and as of yet the depth doesn't have to be tested on either team.
I thought the Northwestern defense would be better than it was, but I'll reserve judgement until more games are played.
When I was watching the game - the first few times, it looked to me that the WR was simply trying to disentangle his arm from the defender. It's hard to tell how much he actually pushed the guy - however, I could see it going either way. I can understand the refs missing that call. Of course, with the benefit of seeing the replay several times - I agree that it SHOULD HAVE been a PI call. Unfortunately, the refs don't always have that luxury. I've forgotten the PI rule ... can they overrule it from review? I believe that if they don't call it ... they cannot call it retroactively from review.There's no other school that gets these calls outside of NW. And it's not just the calls they get, but also the calls they don't ... like that incredibly obvious offensive PI call that was ignored. It is baffling. NW is the dirtiest team in the Big Ten - nobody tackles the head more than they do, nobody takes as many hits out of bounds as them. The offsetting penalty with the illegal formation was criminal. NW always seems to get the benefit on calls.
Unless they are playing an out of conference P5 opponent, in particular an SEC team, such a comment should never be posted on this board.It is close, but Northwestern is a better football team than Purdue. For some reason everybody was jumping on the Boiler bandwagon. NU is better. Way to go Cats..
But Purdue is our most hated rival.Unless they are playing an out of conference P5 opponent, in particular an SEC team, such a comment should never be posted on this board.
Nebraska and Minnesota and Penn State are ahead of Purdue in my book! Nebraska with its "We won the national title 25 years ago so we are ENTITLED to next year" and Minnesota with the "Row the boat" slogan and Elite Coach. Penn State with even with our past we are still better than you just because we are Penn State! I really like it when we BEAT these teams for if nothing else because we are the common folks who work hard, nothing is given to us (we earn it) and if you dismiss us we will knock you into left field! I like our team, our coaches, and our fans( even me) haha, Be leaving in 16 hrs with rain coat water bottle and tickets1 WOOO HOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO HAWKSBut Purdue is our most hated rival.
It's because Delany tried to force that rivalry upon us, I've decided to make them my second favorite conference opponent.But Purdue is our most hated rival.