Hillary lost then lied and blamed the russians for 4 years lolOh, I'm sure he'll never lose. It'll be election interference, a stolen election... you know, just like when Hillary creamed him by 3.5 million votes and Biden landslided him by 8.5 million votes. Gotta protect that mega fragile ego you know, with whatever excuse the cult will believe. 🤣
No she didn’t…you lie all the damn time scruffy…Hillary lost then lied and blamed the russians for 4 years lol
You really wanna pretend Hillary and the left didn't claim that 2016 was stolen for 4 years? Lmfao you're an actual NPCNo she didn’t…you lie all the damn time scruffy…
She did concede her defeat however…and she admitted Trump won the election. But please, just quit your lying and bullshit.
The BS meter went off. Hillary continues to call him an illegitimate president to this dayNo she didn’t…you lie all the damn time scruffy…
She did concede her defeat however…and she admitted Trump won the election. But please, just quit your lying and bullshit.
Never said it wa “stolen”…”stolen” is 100% your boys verbiage. Influenced… yes….. never “stolen”. Try living with the truth once.You really wanna pretend Hillary and the left didn't claim that 2016 was stolen for 4 years? Lmfao you're an actual NPC
No you are confused. Just some #45s kids and not all of them.The BS meter went off. Hillary continues to call him an illegitimate president to this day
Hillary literally said it was "stolen" from her in the clip I literally just shared lololNever said it wa “stolen”…”stolen” is 100% your boys verbiage. Influenced… yes….. never “stolen”. Try living with the truth once.
No she didn’t.Hillary literally said it was "stolen" from her in the clip I literally just shared lolol
Bruh.. why lie like this lmfao it's only 25 seconds in..No she didn’t.
She didn’t say it..that’s not what she said/ meant..you misunderstand…Bruh.. why lie like this lmfao it's only 25 seconds in..
Oh, we've moved on to what she "meant" instead. Fascinating.She didn’t say it..that’s not what she said/ meant..you misunderstand…
I’m in the Kalamazoo area and the evening news is nothing but smear commercials for both sides. More Trump signs and flags out in the sticks, but a lot more Harris signs in the suburbs.Pretty much. I'm in Michigan and it's interesting that I've seen a ton of Kamala billboards on the interstate and ads on tv. Zero trump stuff. Literally none. Not sure what that means exactly but very surprised by that.
To be clear you think it is wrong for candidates to claim that an election was stolen without evidence?Hillary lost then lied and blamed the russians for 4 years lol
You misunderstood scruffy… that’s not what she meant,,.,if she did say it at all. You need to get your hearing checked.Oh, we've moved on to what she "meant" instead. Fascinating.
Psst… it’s not his hearing that’s the problemYou misunderstood scruffy… that’s not what she meant,,.,if she did say it at all. You need to get your hearing checked.
Impossible. It's what they do to make themselves feel better.But please, just quit your lying and bullshit.
Free money is getting cheaper!
![]()
Trump’s Polymarket Odds Top 60%: How Election Betting Markets Differ From Polls
Derek Saul
Oct 17, 2024,05:15pm EDT
Betting markets moved further Thursday toward predicting a former President Donald Trump win, the latest evidence of money flowing into bets supporting another Trump presidency, though polling data point to a far more even split between Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris less than three weeks before Election Day.
The blockchain-based election betting site Polymarket priced in a 60% chance of a Trump victory, breaking the 60% threshold for the first time since late July, days after President Joe Biden bowed out of the race.
Other prominent sites which allow users to wager money on the outcome of the election have similar shifts toward Trump: Betfair places a roughly 58% chance at a Trump win, Kalshi 57%, PredictIt 54% and Smarkets 58%.
Election Betting Odds, which aggregates implied betting odds across the five major markets, gives Trump a 57% chance at victory, tilting in Trump’s favor by the widest margin since July 29, up from about 48% at the end of September.
There’s also the issue of what is driving the dramatic shift in betting odds despite mixed survey data, and Silver, who advises Polymarket, wrote last week it’s possible a Trump-leaning demographic on the sites may skew the data to reflect stronger Trump odds than justified by the data. Polls strive to survey smaller groups representative of the broader U.S. voter population across race, age and other demographics.
The nascent election betting market landscape is not the only financial instrument moving toward a Trump victory. Shares in Trump Media and Technology Group, the Truth Social’s parent company primarily owned by Trump, are up 86% in October, with the low-revenue social media company’s stock movement often viewed as a proxy for Trump’s election odds. And “you can see” evidence in the broader stock market that investors are “very convinced Trump is going to win,” billionaire hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller told Bloomberg Thursday. Druckenmiller pointed to the outperformance of bank stocks and cryptocurrencies, which Trump has promised to deregulate, as evidence; the S&P 500’s financial sector is up 7% over the last month, the top-performing of the S&P’s 13 sectors, while bitcoin is up 15% over the last month, hitting its highest level since August this week. Fellow hedge fund billionaire Daniel Loeb reportedly wrote to clients he’s positioning assets in his Third Point fund to reflect the “increased…likelihood” of a Trump win, noting Third Point is making investments in assets which “could benefit from such a scenario,” according to Reuters. Rich Handler, the chief executive of Jefferies investment bank, wrote on social media Loeb’s assessment was “smart.”
Moonwalk much?Never said it wa “stolen”…”stolen” is 100% your boys verbiage. Influenced… yes….. never “stolen”. Try living with the truth once.
Why is anybody pinning on their hopes on polls? If polls were dependable Romney would have won and so would Hillary
Has been for a while. Harris is a dog shit candidate. Arguably the worst ever (or at least the worst since joe biden)
They legitimately could have run kennedy and won by a land slide lolI tried to tell them… they wouldn’t listen.
The DNC said “Kamala”
Dems replied “Baaaaaaaaa”
Same level of immigrants as during Trump, supporting democracy over fascism in Eastern Europe, crime down as well as inflation. You really suck at this.
No she didn’t…you lie all the damn time scruffy…
She did concede her defeat however…and she admitted Trump won the election. But please, just quit your lying and bullshit.
![]()
You are either being knowingly obtuse or are just a flat out liar.
Still going with "crime is down" huh?Same level of immigrants as during Trump, supporting democracy over fascism in Eastern Europe, crime down as well as inflation. You really suck at this.
Lol if biden wanted to stop 15 million illegals he wouldn't have let them flood into our country while his border czar laughed about not going to the southern border or Europe. Own your policies and their consequences, Joe. This entire disaster happened bc of biden's executive orders and kamala's dereliction of duty."encounters" do not equal immigration #s.
Biden also added in significant increases in manpower, meaning you're going to see more "encounters".
He wanted to beef up even more per the Border Bill that Trump and the MAGAs prevented from becoming law.
Head in the sand moment lolStill going with "crime is down" huh?
Dear Hawaii,
I think Virginia and Minnesota go red before HawaiiDear Hawaii,
You have the chance to surprise the shit out of people.
I agree. And therefore is reallyno way of know what media they are being fed, but, the dems gave them 750 bucks to rebuild while flying cargo planes of money over them to Ukraine. There may be a vibe on the island to go red.I think Virginia and Minnesota go red before Hawaii
Harris is going to be conceding the election by the end of the day, based on this reliable abbd factual Scruffy information!
No, they gave them $750 so they could get baby formula and food to survive the next week or so. But clearly you didn't read past the headline from right wing media.I agree. And therefore is reallyno way of know what media they are being fed, but, the dems gave them 750 bucks to rebuild while flying cargo planes of money over them to Ukraine. There may be a vibe on the island to go red.
I wouldn't bet on it.
As someone who spent the weekend around a bunch of families from the suburbs of the twin cities, the dems better hope every vote on 24th and Hennepin shows up because the red of that state is going to.
This is why there is a concerted effort to mess with the polling averages. They are trying to manufacture "evidence" so they can say there was voter fraud.To be clear you think it is wrong for candidates to claim that an election was stolen without evidence?
Wow one whole week that's so good! Sending those hundreds of billions to Ukraine instead was such a good idea with that in mind. So good!No, they gave them $750 so they could get baby formula and food to survive the next week or so. But clearly you didn't read past the headline from right wing media.