Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the young guards (talking about Ulis and Perkins, specifically) get thrown into a few games early last season and do pretty well? I seriously can't remember them ever appearing to be overwhelmed at any point.No, I get your point, but these young athletic guards have proven exactly zero when thrown into the fire full time. We really don't even know if they are reliable shooters. That 17-18 team had a young Moss, who scored in double digits as well as some youngster named JBo, who had his best scoring year of his career. I sincerely hope I am underestimating this team and their ability to handle the rigors of B1G basketball and all the talented opposition they will face. I am a Hawk fan and always hope for the best. I will stand by my statement that if we make it to the NCAA's, McCaffery and these young players will have done a helluva job.
I get that there is more overall athleticism by position when you looked at the depth, but that may not be the case given who is on the floor at the time. Sliding J-Bo to the 2 may increase the athleticism at the 1, but doesn't at the 2. Let's see how many minutes Connor is able to play post surgery. I have no idea how much that limited him last year, but seeing the time it took J-Bo and Naz Long to come back from hip surgery, it is hard to imagine Connor will be more athletic this year, but we shall see. I think Joe's athleticism was sometimes underrated, so will be interesting to see at the three. Certainly Patrick was aggressive there last year, but you lose him as the back-up when he slides into a starting role (assuming he does) and then you have to ask if the back-up will be as effective in that role as he was last year.I will respectfully disagree on this. I think there are a couple pretty significant differences with this years team. First, overall athleticism at all positions is better. The other thing I like is lineup flexibility. We can play with a smaller, guard oriented lineup with long athletic guys at the #4 and #5. We can also play long at all positions without much of a drop in athleticism. It's going to be a fun year.
I will respectfully disagree on this. I think there are a couple pretty significant differences with this years team. First, overall athleticism at all positions is better. The other thing I like is lineup flexibility. We can play with a smaller, guard oriented lineup with long athletic guys at the #4 and #5. We can also play long at all positions without much of a drop in athleticism. It's going to be a fun year.
Perkins came on late in the year and of course we have been told that he has taken his game to a new level in the off season.Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the young guards (talking about Ulis and Perkins, specifically) get thrown into a few games early last season and do pretty well? I seriously can't remember them ever appearing to be overwhelmed at any point.
I understand what you're saying. While I know knocking down 3's is important, so is the ability to take guys off the dribble, to have cutters and quick ball movement when opponents are playing man. So much of our offense ran through Garza last season. IMHO, that takes others out of the offensive flow at least some of the time. I am excited to see what adjustments are made.What worries me is Fran said to expect Connor to shoot more (in his new role). Ummm....
And Joe T has an inconsistent jumper, as we have all seen.
We may be more athletic but name a team in the B1G that is not.
And you still have to put the ball in the hole. And in today's game, you have to hit 3 point shot. JBo is the only known threat from 3.
Those two proved themselves, but there wasn’t a reliable backup at either guard spot. Whatever backup PG we have will be an improvement over Ellingson who was playing wildly out of position. Bohannon has proven he can play the PG spot, but he wasn’t at the level necessary to carry an entire position on his own.No, I get your point, but these young athletic guards have proven exactly zero when thrown into the fire full time. We really don't even know if they are reliable shooters. That 17-18 team had a young Moss, who scored in double digits as well as some youngster named JBo, who had his best scoring year of his career. I sincerely hope I am underestimating this team and their ability to handle the rigors of B1G basketball and all the talented opposition they will face. I am a Hawk fan and always hope for the best. I will stand by my statement that if we make it to the NCAA's, McCaffery and these young players will have done a helluva job.
That should worry everyone.What worries me is Fran said to expect Connor to shoot more (in his new role). Ummm....
I believe there were a couple games Ulis had bad games, but for the most part played solid.Correct me if I am wrong but didn't the young guards (talking about Ulis and Perkins, specifically) get thrown into a few games early last season and do pretty well? I seriously can't remember them ever appearing to be overwhelmed at any point.
I understand what you're saying. While I know knocking down 3's is important, so is the ability to take guys off the dribble, to have cutters and quick ball movement when opponents are playing man. So much of our offense ran through Garza last season. IMHO, that takes others out of the offensive flow at least some of the time. I am excited to see what adjustments are made.
Not that I recall. He had few if any turnovers and did a decent job defending.I believe there were a couple games Ulis had bad games, but for the most part played solid.
Ulis had a strong game at Rutgers and at home against MSU.Not that I recall. He had few if any turnovers and did a decent job defending.
Ulis had a strong game at Rutgers and at home against MSU.
Wow, look at you being all optimistic and such!I like the team so much I already have NCAA expectations. It will be a new group but maybe McC has the program at a point that the boys can maintain quality play even when hit with a the loss of team leaders/best players.
We have some highly regarded recruits now stepping into new roles, especially with Patrick, Joey and Ahron and Riley having 4*s somewhere. We have at least one guy that has all Big Ten potential this season-Keegan. Everything about the team says they can play well in an up tempo game but also defend better that the recently successful Iowa teams.
This where we all say "Go Hawks!!!" and drop the mic.
Good for them. I’m amazed that all can’t do the same, to be honest. If you apply yourself, if only for an hour or two a day, you can succeed in college.
Perhaps one game, he was a liability and was pulled. I can’t tell you which game though. Either way, no biggie. I look forward to seeing what Ulis can do with extended minutes. I think he can be a really solid dependable player.Not that I recall. He had few if any turnovers and did a decent job defending.
Good options at point guard I think. I am in the Joey T is going to be a very good point guard. Ahron will get quality minutes. Expect good things at that position.Perhaps one game, he was a liability and was pulled. I can’t tell you which game though. Either way, no biggie. I look forward to seeing what Ulis can do with extended minutes. I think he can be a really solid dependable player.
No, I get your point, but these young athletic guards have proven exactly zero when thrown into the fire full time. We really don't even know if they are reliable shooters. That 17-18 team had a young Moss, who scored in double digits as well as some youngster named JBo, who had his best scoring year of his career. I sincerely hope I am underestimating this team and their ability to handle the rigors of B1G basketball and all the talented opposition they will face. I am a Hawk fan and always hope for the best. I will stand by my statement that if we make it to the NCAA's, McCaffery and these young players will have done a helluva job.
Here's an 18 minute podcast where Fran discusses Luka and Joe making the NBA and next season.
I demand that you all listen. To not do so would be im- @Moral
Direct Link to Listen: http://collegehoopswatch.com/2021/0...s-episode-686-iowa-head-coach-fran-mccaffery/
I’m just curious why he mentions depth when jbo and Connor will play the whole game anyway.
also to mention of Austin ash??? 😂
That should worry everyone.
If AUSTIN ASH sees significant or meaningful minutes, we are F'd.I’m just curious why he mentions depth when jbo and Connor will play the whole game anyway.
also to mention of Austin ash??? 😂
That should worry everyone.
I hope you’re right. He shot below 30% from 3 last year, so that has to improve.I'm not worried
I'd expect to see better shooting numbers from C-Mac if he is in fact "looking" for his shot more. Often times Connor was forced to take shots he wasn't looking for.
Same thing happened a lot with Mike Gesell.
When you're looking to take a good shot, vs pressed into taking a forced shot late in the clock that will impact numbers.
Same thing I expect from Keegan, Joe T, Ahron, and Tony. They're going to get more opportunities to take good shots.
Well we won nearly every game he played in so..........If AUSTIN ASH sees significant or meaningful minutes, we are F'd.
I think that's a pretty realistic perspective....but I guess I didn't see any real hype. Fran talked up a few players, but I actually felt his comments were devoid of team hype.....almost like Fran was downplaying any hype which is out of the norm for him. Being paranoid it even causes me to worry a little bit.I’m not going to believe any hype at this time. I am pretty certain the team will be more athletic but I’m not convinced they’ll be very good at basketball. Defense should improve, offense should regress quite a bit. We shall see how things go but my sense is this team won’t be in the top half of the B1G… and I’m not thrilled about that on year 13 of our “coach”.
I see it just the opposite. Fran gets offense from unexpected guys over his career. What he hasn't showed is the ability to get his guys to play defense. We need to run and jump with the guys we have this year. I want to see ally oops and driving to the bucket a lot more than in previous years. I'll believe in the defense when I see it, not worried about offense.Iowa could be pretty solid on D this year and really struggle to score. I also think the better athletes on the wing will allow Iowa to look more like the 5 out look you saw from Oregon. More space to drive but you have to make buckets and create good looks for shooters.
He shot 58% from the fee throw line so that's something.I hope you’re right. He shot below 30% from 3 last year, so that has to improve.
Not that I recall. He had few if any turnovers and did a decent job defending.
Yeah, that’s bad.He shot 58% from the fee throw line so that's something.
What’s interesting is that in Connor’s first two seasons he was 75% and 78% from the line. So, he has it in him to shoot FTs at s better clip.Yeah, that’s bad.