ADVERTISEMENT

VP Harris to sit down with Bret Baier on 10/16, her first with FOX News

First question has to be...you have said repeatedly you are from a middle class family...REPEATEDLY....Can you tell us your definition of the middle class??

P.S. Father is a tenured professor at Univ of California Berkeley where average compensation for above position nears $200,000 in year 2024 dollars and your Mother is a PhD in Molecular Biology with private corporate compensation well in excess of that level...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: ericram, PackerHawkeye1, Torg and 1 other person
scotihawk said:
First question has to be...you have said repeatedly you are from a middle class family...REPEATEDLY....Can you tell us your definition of the middle class??

P.S. Father is a tenured professor at Univ of California Berkeley where average compensation for above position nears $200,000 in year 2024 dollars and your Mother is a PhD in Molecular Biology with private corporate compensation well in excess of that level...
Click to expand...
what were they making when she grew up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher, Torg, gohawks50 and 2 others
scotihawk said:
First question has to be...you have said repeatedly you are from a middle class family...REPEATEDLY....Can you tell us your definition of the middle class??

P.S. Father is a tenured professor at Univ of California Berkeley where average compensation for above position nears $200,000 in year 2024 dollars and your Mother is a PhD in Molecular Biology with private corporate compensation well in excess of that level...
Click to expand...
Say its a hell of a lot closer to middle class than Trump grew up in haha.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ericram, Torg, mattymoknows and 2 others
Rifler said:
Baier will give her a fair hearing,.. If this goes poorly it will be on Harris.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily.
Baier will ask questions and I suspect that most will be border/inflation questions that most agree favors Trump.
Will he address women's rights and will the interview include Trump's negatives and Harris' strengths???

And also remember the 2020 post election controversy where Baier privately admitted the election was NOT stolen, but questioned the results "on air"?
Yeah, he's not as objective as our resident Republicans think he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher, funksouljon and Tom Paris
Rifler said:
Because the media has been proven to be frequently incorrect and uneven with their fact checking,.. Better to put that responsibility on the debate opponent..
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
MitchLL said:
Not necessarily.
Baier will ask questions and I suspect that most will be border/inflation questions that most agree favors Trump.
Will he address women's rights and will the interview include Trump's negatives and Harris' strengths???

And also remember the 2020 post election controversy where Baier privately admitted the election was NOT stolen, but questioned the results "on air"?
Yeah, he's not as objective as our resident Republicans think he is.
Click to expand...
Nobody stays on Fox unless they can tow the company line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 and Out on D, nelly02 and fsu1jreed
Yeah, they were probably only making $50,000 each in the 1970's....

P.S. The going salary for a masters degree Chemical Engineer at one of those terrible Oil Companies called Amoco Oil in 1978 was approximately $18,000 annually....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
desihawk said:
i’m trying to imagine a good chunk of the demographic that will watch switch sides but just don’t see it happening
Click to expand...
Agree, the race is close though.
Remember that Georgia controversy where Trunp called the Georgia official and wanted him to "find" 11,000 votes?

A 1% influence in certain States could be enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackbones and Tom Paris
scotihawk said:
Yeah, they were probably only making $50,000 each in the 1970's....

P.S. The going salary for a masters degree Chemical Engineer at one of those terrible Oil Companies called Amoco Oil in 1978 was approximately $18,000 annually....
Click to expand...
You're an idiot.

According to available data from the American Association of University Professors (AAUP):

  • In the 1970s, average salaries for professors were much lower than today, with a full professor earning around $15,000–$25,000 per year.
  • Assistant professors or non-tenured faculty typically earned less, generally in the range of $10,000–$15,000 annually at prestigious universities like UC Berkeley.
 
MitchLL said:
Agree, the race is close though.
Remember that Georgia controversy where Trunp called the Georgia official and wanted him to "find" 11,000 votes?

A 1% influence in certain States could be enough.
Click to expand...
No but I remember when Trump said he needed to find 11870 votes.

I need to find =/= find me
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
TNHAWK79 said:
You realize he went on CNN for town hall, CNN for interview and ABC for debate. He went to the black journalist debate (kamala no showed). Trump is not afraid to go to hostile territory.
Kamala- the View, 60 min, CNN, Howard Stern. All liberal networks. Can’t wait to hear more about her upbringing in the “middle class” and how the border is fine. Just once I want to see her answer a yes no question.
Click to expand...
Go cry.
 
RileyHawk said:
You're an idiot.

According to available data from the American Association of University Professors (AAUP):

  • In the 1970s, average salaries for professors were much lower than today, with a full professor earning around $15,000–$25,000 per year.
  • Assistant professors or non-tenured faculty typically earned less, generally in the range of $10,000–$15,000 annually at prestigious universities like UC Berkeley.
Click to expand...
Wonder where you got that info....other folks must have asked Kamala the same question.....and her handlers have provided that information to stooges like you....I stand by my assertion that two PhD parents from Berkeley with a combined income of even $50,000 in 1970's dollars weren't struggling to make ends meet....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
Whiskeydeltadeltatango said:
No but I remember when Trump said he needed to find 11870 votes.

I need to find =/= find me
Click to expand...
You're proving yourself to be a moron yet again.

No, we do have a way but I don’t want to get into it. We found a way in other states excuse me, but we don’t need it because we’re only down 11,000 votes so we don’t even need it. I personally think they’re corrupt as hell. But we don’t need that. Because all we have to do Cleta is find 11,000-plus votes. So we don’t need that. I’m not looking to shake up the whole world. We won Georgia easily. We won it by hundreds of thousands of votes. But if you go by basic simple numbers, we won it easily, easily. So we’re not giving Dominion a pass on the record. We just, we don’t need Dominion, because we have so many other votes that we don’t need to prove it any more than we already have.

So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

Oh, I don’t know, look Brad. I got to get … I have to find 12,000 votes and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state.

But they’re shredding ballots because they think we’re going to eventually get … because we’ll eventually get into Fulton. In my opinion it’s never too late. … So, that’s the story. Look, we need only 11,000 votes. We have are far more than that as it stands now. We’ll have more and more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nelly02
scotihawk said:
Wonder where you got that info....other folks must have asked Kamala the same question.....and her handlers have provided that information to stooges like you....I stand by my assertion that two PhD parents from Berkeley with a combined income of even $50,000 in 1970's dollars weren't struggling to make ends meet....
Click to expand...
You highlighted where it came from dumbass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nelly02
RileyHawk said:
You're proving yourself to be a moron yet again.

No, we do have a way but I don’t want to get into it. We found a way in other states excuse me, but we don’t need it because we’re only down 11,000 votes so we don’t even need it. I personally think they’re corrupt as hell. But we don’t need that. Because all we have to do Cleta is find 11,000-plus votes. So we don’t need that. I’m not looking to shake up the whole world. We won Georgia easily. We won it by hundreds of thousands of votes. But if you go by basic simple numbers, we won it easily, easily. So we’re not giving Dominion a pass on the record. We just, we don’t need Dominion, because we have so many other votes that we don’t need to prove it any more than we already have.

So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

Oh, I don’t know, look Brad. I got to get … I have to find 12,000 votes and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state.

But they’re shredding ballots because they think we’re going to eventually get … because we’ll eventually get into Fulton. In my opinion it’s never too late. … So, that’s the story. Look, we need only 11,000 votes. We have are far more than that as it stands now. We’ll have more and more.
Click to expand...
Well done Riley, you have proven what I said.


Yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section25
Rifler said:
Start here and you can google multiple other articles that tell the same story...

Loading…

thehill.com
Click to expand...
You chose a source that needs it's own fact checker. Violent crime is down over the past 3 years despite what this rag is trying to spin. You're failure rate is very high.

2020 rate - 398.5 per 100,000 people. 2023 crime statistics indicate a national violent crime rate of approximately 380.7 incidents per 100,000 people, which marks a 3% decrease from 2022. Specific categories like murder saw an 11.6% decrease, while rape, aggravated assault, and robbery also showed declines of 9.4%, 2.8%, and 0.3%, respectively. These figures reflect reported crimes from a large number of law enforcement agencies across the country.

Federal Bureau of Investigation
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: HawkMD, ericram, doughuddl2 and 1 other person
LuteHawk said:
Special Report with Bret Baier is the most watched Cable
News program. This will gave Harris an opportunity to impress
the TV audience as a Presidential candidate. Bret Baier is
a fair no-nonsense guy who asks good questions. This will
be a win-win situation for Harris.
Click to expand...
I just hope Bret follows up her responses to “fact check” her and make her think on her feet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ItsAllBallBearingsNowadays and HIWILLE
Huey Grey said:
When will Rs admit that Trump is a chicken shit?
Click to expand...
He’s actually smart to perhaps limit interviews these last few weeks, as he is apparently in a good position to win the presidency. Why say something stupid, or be taken out of context, that would hurt him. It’s the Biden strategy from 2020. 😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83 and HIWILLE
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Huey Grey

Trump won't even debate Harris on Fox.

Replies
13
Views
645
Off Topic
MeetTheFerentzes
MeetTheFerentzes
S

Is the Media Turning on Kamala Harris?

Replies
61
Views
1K
Off Topic
Hans81
H
S

Opinion: Kamala Harris’s Fox News interview disaster shows how the media set her up to fail

Replies
26
Views
604
Off Topic
Finance85
Finance85
cigaretteman

Trump Assails ABC, but He’s Not Thrilled With Fox News, Either

Replies
46
Views
1K
Off Topic
RicoSuave102954
RicoSuave102954
RicoSuave102954

VP Harris covers mouth, says ‘it’s a live broadcast’ after stumbling through Hurricane Milton speech

Replies
5
Views
526
Off Topic
Speedway1
Speedway1
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back