Again, scoring will not be an issue with this team.
Wagner provides invaluable minutes off the bench with his defense and rebounding. And he's athletic enough to score around the rim. That's all Iowa needs him to do.
I like Ahmad, but I'm not seeing it. Is he that much superior at defense that he should replace Big's that are a threat to score? I'm not sure how to quantify defense. In rebounds per minutes played Wagner was last, in 2016-17, compared to all the other forwards.Again, scoring will not be an issue with this team.
Wagner provides invaluable minutes off the bench with his defense and rebounding. And he's athletic enough to score around the rim. That's all Iowa needs him to do.
I like Ahmad, but I'm not seeing it. Is he that much superior at defense that he should replace Big's that are a threat to score? I'm not sure how to quantify defense. In rebounds per minutes played Wagner was last, in 2016-17, compared to all the other forwards.
Cook .216
Pemsl .259
Baer .244
Wagner .213
Uhl .219
Kriener .262
Wagner is quick and athletic, but that doesn't seem to translate to production. Now we add Garza and Nunge, who are both taller/longer and appear to be better offensively. I'm not seeing many minutes from Ahmad, unless he takes his defense and rebounding to another level.
He's still is no Reggie Evens when it comes to rebounding.
Again, scoring will not be an issue with this team.
Wagner provides invaluable minutes off the bench with his defense and rebounding. And he's athletic enough to score around the rim. That's all Iowa needs him to do.
He's still is no Reggie Evens when it comes to rebounding.
well there are not very many Reggie Evans...those are pretty high shoes to compare. I think what people are suggesting is...not every player will score points every time out...but there are other areas of the game that they can contribute.
this football thing...well its Ahmad's choice of what sport he plays..his scholarship was offered to play BB not FB.
Every team needs a guy or two willing to do the dirty work. Now, Baer was the logical choice given how he helped his first two years, but he then started developing "some" offensive game, with a half-decent 3 point shot to boot.
But when you look at the vets on this team...we got a lot of players who figure to pencil in the "dirty work vets" type. Every one of them.
Uhl, Baer, Ellingson, Wagner, Williams - all fit the bill to me. Iowa's going to need these veterans to lead, to set the example - and their offensive profiles during their careers show, they ain't scorers (Baer has shown flashes), but can provide the glue type output all teams need.
Just need to be better at it is all.
His job is not to score. His job is to do all the little things that make the whole greater than the sum of the parts. He defends and makes plays on that end, he rebounds and advances the ball, he attacks the offensive glass.18 minutes against the German team w/o scoring. I was hoping he could develop a little 10' jumper.
His job is not to score. His job is to do all the little things that make the whole greater than the sum of the parts. He defends and makes plays on that end, he rebounds and advances the ball, he attacks the offensive glass.
You'll see more "stat production" out of him as teams commit more attention to Cook/Garza/Nunge (and hopefully a healthy Pemsl), opening up Wagner to clean up misses by these guys, or be on the receiving end of passes from having his guy leave to double, or just get caught watching guys like Cook/Garza/Nunge.
And then there is Kreiner, who appears to be ready to stretch the floor, clearing for a 1-v-1 offensive rebounding matchup for Wagner to exploit.
Learn to love Wagner for what he is now. There is a lot to love.
Guess I'm alone on this one![]()
Same probably goes for Uhl. I imagine most of the minutes will go to Cook, Pemsl, Garza, Kreiner, Nunge.I like Ahmad, but I'm not seeing it. Is he that much superior at defense that he should replace Big's that are a threat to score? I'm not sure how to quantify defense. In rebounds per minutes played Wagner was last, in 2016-17, compared to all the other forwards.
Cook .216
Pemsl .259
Baer .244
Wagner .213
Uhl .219
Kriener .262
Wagner is quick and athletic, but that doesn't seem to translate to production. Now we add Garza and Nunge, who are both taller/longer and appear to be better offensively. I'm not seeing many minutes from Ahmad, unless he takes his defense and rebounding to another level.
All you that are pushing Wagner seem to forget he is pretty much the antithesis of Jok. Jok was mostly scoring and little defense and (until the end) rebounding. Wagner rebounds and defends but doesn't score much. So you lose the offense.
Much better to find a player that can rebound and defend 'pretty' good, but also score. If you remember last year, Kriener rebounded well, scored, and was diving on the floor and bodying up against big guys. In my opinion, his only weakness was too many fouls.
jmho
IMO glue-guys can also contribute in the scoring column. I'd probably label both Bohannon and Baer glue-guys.I dont think anyone is pushing AW... just pointing out there is more to the game than scoring...sometimes having too many scorers can be as much of a problem.
Ya it would be great to have everyone rebound defend & score..but you also need those glue guys. I agree Ryan Kriener is a much better shooter...
IMO glue-guys can also contribute in the scoring column. I'd probably label both Bohannon and Baer glue-guys.
I don't think you can ever have too many scorers, unless you have a Recker vs Evans dynamic where they don't share the ball like they should. IIRC both Lute and Davis had teams with 4-5 double digit scorers.
If you aren't a threat to score, you'd better be really strong in other area's of your game, because you are a liability on offense, if defenders can help off of you.
Without so many quality Big's I could see both Uhl and Wagner contributing 10-15 minutes per game. Right now it seems Fran has options that don't require sacrificing scoring.
I agree on defense, rebounding and being athletic enough to finish around the rim.. he just needs to actually finish around the rim. Faaaar too often he would miss bunnies inside. Hopefully he buttons that up this year!Again, scoring will not be an issue with this team.
Wagner provides invaluable minutes off the bench with his defense and rebounding. And he's athletic enough to score around the rim. That's all Iowa needs him to do.
If you had too many of them, we would be the only BIG team to average 10 points a game.Ahmad is going to get his minutes against more physical players. Wags brings toughness to this team and Fran knows that. He is a great athlete and you can never have too many of them.
I guess I'm confused where Wagner would fit on the football team. Sure he's a tough physical guy and I get that and it's mostly joking, but he likely would not see the field for the FB team IMO.
He definitely has a place on the bball team. He plays a very important roll. You don't need 5 scorers on the floor at all times, having an energy guy who can defend and rebound while being able to pass the ball well are all we need from Ahmad. The only thing I'd really like to see him improve from last year is his touch around the rim. I've seen him make some great moves only to clank a lay up off the back of the rim awkwardly.
I'm really pulling for him as I feel he's one of those glue guys that makes the game/life fun for everyone and he seems like such a great person.