AS a four not at all but as a 6’2” center she is going to have some problems. rebounding has been as still is a major weakness.Hannah Stuelke? Weak?
AS a four not at all but as a 6’2” center she is going to have some problems. rebounding has been as still is a major weakness.Hannah Stuelke? Weak?
Issue with Hanna at the 4 and another at the 5 is that it would completely clog the paint for Clark. If Iowa plays someone at the 4 that the defense does not have to guard at the 3 point line, they are going to put them dead center of the paint, having another in the paint guarding the 5, and not let Clark get to the rim, mainly just focusing on running her off the 3 point line at that point. IMO, it is why the 4, at least for this year, has to be able to spread the defense. I can see them going small, spread the court with shooters and 1 in the paint, and let Clark go to work. Double her and you're leaving a shooter.Maybe we still can get a 6'5" or so center in the portal. We could use the depth and against certain teams i think Hanna is a better 4 than 5.
Yeah, sacrificing rebounding for Clarks driving but i can see both happening in the same game. Need Hanna to develop a jump shot, not necessarily a 3. Just a good 10 footer would free up the lane better.Issue with Hanna at the 4 and another at the 5 is that it would completely clog the paint for Clark. If Iowa plays someone at the 4 that the defense does not have to guard at the 3 point line, they are going to put them dead center of the paint, having another in the paint guarding the 5, and not let Clark get to the rim, mainly just focusing on running her off the 3 point line at that point. IMO, it is why the 4, at least for this year, has to be able to spread the defense. I can see them going small, spread the court with shooters and 1 in the paint, and let Clark go to work. Double her and you're leaving a shooter.
Agree. If they cannot add an outstanding 5, I would prefer they get a 4 who shoots the 3 at >35%. The roster is going to be down Czinano, Warnock, Wetering, and A. Jones (won't be playing). A 4 is coming in 24-25, but we are thin at the 4 right now. If Hannanh is truly the best 5 on the roster, she is tall enough for most (all?) Big 10 teams. There might be match-ups where she would slide to the 4.Issue with Hanna at the 4 and another at the 5 is that it would completely clog the paint for Clark. If Iowa plays someone at the 4 that the defense does not have to guard at the 3 point line, they are going to put them dead center of the paint, having another in the paint guarding the 5, and not let Clark get to the rim, mainly just focusing on running her off the 3 point line at that point. IMO, it is why the 4, at least for this year, has to be able to spread the defense. I can see them going small, spread the court with shooters and 1 in the paint, and let Clark go to work. Double her and you're leaving a shooter.
I haven’t really seen to many people say that it’s not a concern.We'll never know, but to rule it out is burying your head in the sand.
I was hearing rumblings two weeks ago UCLA or home to Colorado. Iowa fan's were getting all excited about nothing. She was never coming East of the rockies.
“She loves California” seems to be the consensus reason. Can’t blame her 🤷♂️🤷🤷♀️I was hearing rumblings two weeks ago UCLA or home to Colorado. Iowa fan's were getting all excited about nothing. She was never coming East of the rockies.
Iowa has a very good nucleus and some solid young players. With Caitlin leading the charge, Iowa will be tough.
No you can’t. UCLA is like an ivy school now in terms of being accepted. It would be hard to say now to that education, etc.“She loves California” seems to be the consensus reason. Can’t blame her 🤷♂️🤷🤷♀️
mitch thinks other issues COULD be the reason......smh“She loves California” seems to be the consensus reason. Can’t blame her 🤷♂️🤷🤷♀️