Coti McMahon would fit nicely there IMO.I could see LSU...
It's also worth mentioning that short term improvements can come at the expense of long-term improvements.I’m all about improving the team and most of us are. I’m sure Jan talks with the players first to see how they feel. Do they want to improve the team and go to higher places or do they wanna play more. It’s tough either way. It’s early but signs of Big improvements are a possibility. Making the final four is what it’s all about. go Hawkeyes.
I would play Williams at the 4 and let Hannah back up Ava.It's also worth mentioning that short term improvements can come at the expense of long-term improvements.
I think Ava Heiden needs to start at the 5 next year in part because starting for a full year next year will make her better as a junior and senior. Bringing in a player like Williams would undoubtedly make Iowa better next year, but it could also slow Heiden's development or even lead her to transfer in the worst case scenario.
I know I've argued Deal at PG probably isn't plan A, but if the coaches believe she can be one of the best PGs in the country as a junior and senior, it makes sense to give her the keys to the offense next year over a transfer. Iowa might struggle early in that scenario, but her development would lead to rewards later.
The core of Iowa's roster is very young. It will likely be at its best in the 2026-2027 and 2027-2028 seasons. Iowa will look to improve through the portal for next year, but I doubt the coaches will sacrifice development for the young rotation players in the process.
There's a 0% chance Iowa brings in a transfer with the intent of benching Hannah Stuelke.I would play Williams at the 4 and let Hannah back up Ava.
If Hannah doesn't put the work in to play the 4, she will come off the bench for Ava.There's a 0% chance Iowa brings in a transfer with the intent of benching Hannah Stuelke.
Iowa will try to bring in a PG out of the portal, an obvious need. This allows the coaches to find the best position fit for Deal. I think the next realistic possibility is a 3 that can score. I think Kylie returns to help Strenlow if a legitimate scorer isn't brought on board. HS and Tegan M will start the year at the 4. I think the coaches will gamble on improvement from both.It's also worth mentioning that short term improvements can come at the expense of long-term improvements.
I think Ava Heiden needs to start at the 5 next year in part because starting for a full year next year will make her better as a junior and senior. Bringing in a player like Williams would undoubtedly make Iowa better next year, but it could also slow Heiden's development or even lead her to transfer in the worst case scenario.
I know I've argued Deal at PG probably isn't plan A, but if the coaches believe she can be one of the best PGs in the country as a junior and senior, it makes sense to give her the keys to the offense next year over a transfer. Iowa might struggle early in that scenario, but her development would lead to rewards later.
The core of Iowa's roster is very young. It will likely be at its best in the 2026-2027 and 2027-2028 seasons. Iowa will look to improve through the portal for next year, but I doubt the coaches will sacrifice development for the young rotation players in the process.
ExactlyIf Hannah doesn't put the work in to play the 4, she will come off the bench for Ava.
A sit down with Hannah of what is expected is needed.Iowa will try to bring in a PG out of the portal, an obvious need. This allows the coaches to find the best position fit for Deal. I think the next realistic possibility is a 3 that can score. I think Kylie returns to help Strenlow if a legitimate scorer isn't brought on board. HS and Tegan M will start the year at the 4. I think the coaches will gamble on improvement from both.
So you think the girl who has been 2nd team all conference and scored 48 pts in a game is going to be put on the bench her Senior year? Sure thing.If Hannah doesn't put the work in to play the 4, she will come off the bench for Ava.
I think Ava will be better than Hannah next year, especially on defense.So you think the girl who has been 2nd team all conference and scored 48 pts in a game is going to be put on the bench her Senior year? Sure thing.
She’s starting somewhere my man. It’s probably at the 4 but more power to you if you think she comes off the bench. 😎I think Ava will be better than Hannah next year, especially on defense.
Hannah off the bench is a good thing to have.
I hope she puts in the work to play the 4. It hasn't happened yet.She’s starting somewhere my man. It’s probably at the 4 but more power to you if you think she comes off the bench. 😎
2nd team all conference. She’s lazy.I hope she puts in the work to play the 4. It hasn't happened yet.
She was a one trick pony being able to run out and feast on Caitlin's passing.2nd team all conference. She’s lazy.
So if she’s a one trick pony under CC how did she manage to make 2nd team this year?She was a one trick pony being able to run out and feast on Caitlin's passing.
It's not a lazy thing, it's a skill-set thing
You all need to stop with the handwringing. Hannah will be a very good 4 next year. She played that position her freshman year and has this summer to acclimate. She’ll be great next season.I think Ava will be better than Hannah next year, especially on defense.
Hannah off the bench is a good thing to have.
It’s actually ridiculous the criticism she receives from some of our “fans.”You all need to stop with the handwringing. Hannah will be a very good 4 next year. She played that position her freshman year and has this summer to acclimate. She’ll be great next season.
I know some aren't going to like this, but I agree with her statement. IF Iowa wants to continue to be a top 10 or higher team in the post CC22 era, you can't afford to have 3 or 4 players languishing on the bench who simply aren't going to play.