ADVERTISEMENT

We're all here to be entertained, correct?

it would be really hard {or really easy maybe} to stage this thing and consistently get the same results {plus or minus a win or two, and a bowl win or two} year in and year out for 25 freakin' yrs. think about it: that's a heck of a job somebody is doing. if they are doing it.

could you imagine robbing banks and liquor stores for 25 yrs straight? and not getting caught?

I understand why some might think he tanks games with the strategy of playing in minor bowls he can win versus major bowls where he will be out-coached.
One thing that probably feeds this theory was when he was quoted by network commentators over a decade ago telling his coaches, "If we keep winning this season we're gonna go to a real bowl game and get out butts kicked".
The fact his mind works that way is revealing, the additional fact he was willing to say it out loud should've got him canned.
 
Last edited:
I understand why some might think he tanks games with the strategy of playing in minor bowls he can win versus major bowls where he will be out-coached.
One thing that probably feeds this theory was when he was quoted by network commentators over a decade ago telling his coaches, "If we keep winning this season we're gonna go to a real bowl game and get out butts kicked".
The fact his mind works that way is revealing, the additional fact he was willing to say it out loud should've got him canned.
Clearly he wasn't being literal.

The fact that your brain works in a way in which you don't understand that is quite revealing
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AEG82
I'm pretty sure everyone here thinks you are autistic.
100% and it's why I try not to stir the pot with them anymore but damn, they're just begging to be put down.

It's gotta be a simple troll job at this point, no? I don't even know if Eyes realizes 80-90% of the board probably has them on ignore at this point. I only unselect it because I just can't look away sometimes. I don't take it seriously but, I just kinda feel bad for them honestly because they're probably like this in real life too. That sucks.
 
You're damn right, Champ.

🙏 Please help rid these idiots from the state of Iowa 🙏
I know you wanted that to have more punch. And since you finished 49th at the Paralympics Checkers Challenge this year I'm gonna give you a do-over.
Now come at me again, only this time try and impress your middle school counselor. Throw in a few dozen emojis and impress the crowd with a pic of you in the Mulva jacket.
I believe in you. And now that you know there is one person in the world who does, you can acquire the necessary confidence and up your game.
 
I think what gets to people sometimes here……it looks staged - and like they are tanking it on purpose ……
I've been thinking the same thing for over 10 years. I can't believe anyone would be as stupid and dumb as KF appears to be. And it wouldn't surprise me if he tries to burn the whole football program down as a middle finger to all his critics and to get revenge on Beth for firing Brian.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk
And this is what gets me

People act like only Kirk could produce these results.

I think Tim Lester or another lesser known coach gets us the 8-9 wins consistently. Especially have a DC like Phil

Instead there are some who truly believe we must never try to score points and only focus on punting and defense scores

I’ve stayed away for a bit because I didn’t want to be seen as rubbing the outcome in anybody’s face or anything. Not to defend Ferentz, but I’m sure Nebraska fans said the same thing after Solich and Pelini. They have the longest active bowl drought of ANY P4/5 team. They appear to be back, but if you would have said that to any sane person, Neb would go 8 years without a bowl and somebody like Vandy and Wake Forest would, I mean I think we can all agree that thought would be unfathomable.

IMO Ferentz has done a great job, I personally would be overjoyed to see ISU have Iowa’s success, but I get the angst. Losing games where you have a 187 yard rusher, a good defense, etc. should be incomprehensible. I think a lot of Cade’s limitations can be placed on his injury history so I don’t want to be too hard on the guy but I just think it’s unserious to keep running him out there. It was unserious to keep running Hill out there. I do not and cannot understand it.

A few other random thoughts, some of which aren’t really original:

  1. I’ve seen people blaming Ferentz for being too conservative in this game, but I highly doubt Ferentz feels this way. Honestly I think a very good case could be made that if Brian was the OC Iowa likely wins that game. Iowa would not have tried those rinky dink plays on 1stand goal, Iowa probably runs a whole lot more, they don’t try that throwback pass that is picked off early after halftime, they don’t go for 2, etc. I think anybody expecting Ferentz to change to be more aggressive after this game I think is in for a very rude awakening. I think it goes the other way.
  2. McNamara looked good early with the scripted plays, and a team having early success against ISU’s defense is pretty standard practice because ISU always comes out extremely vanilla on D to see what the other team is trying to do and then make adjustments. As soon as ISU started bringing pressure McNamara buckled like a belt. I believe he likely does look really good in practice when it’s essentially running a 7-on-7 game. But once he had to move around and avoid getting hit I mean it was really bad.
  3. Been said enough but KJ is legit and they need to lean on him the rest of the year.

I could go for a while because that was just one of the strangest games I’ve ever seen.
 
You could argue that it was an entertaining game if you define that as it being undecided down to the last minute.

On the other hand, if you are looking for a passing offense that can sling it around the field consistently. Or a qb that has mobility and can make plays. Or a coaching staff that continues to push the offense to light up the scoreboard then I'd say not great on the entertainment front.
I'd settle for just being competent. The Iowa offense is still far from competent, particularly with respect to passing and QB play.
 
I'm pretty sure everyone here thinks you are autistic.
100% and it's why I try not to stir the pot with them anymore but damn, they're just begging to be put down.

It's gotta be a simple troll job at this point, no? I don't even know if Eyes realizes 80-90% of the board probably has them on ignore at this point. I only unselect it because I just can't look away sometimes. I don't take it seriously but, I just kinda feel bad for them honestly because they're probably like this in real life too. That sucks.
Well I'm ecstatic that I don't think the way you guys do.

When it comes to football, football fans have to be about the dumbest cross-section of humans you can find on earth
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AEG82
So ISU has a pulse this year but didn't last year. Gotcha
You know damn well what he meant by a team with a pulse. 93-0, those were teams with a pulse. But you conveniently have no explanation for that.

What kind of coach gets shutout by the 3 best teams he faces and just hangs his hat on “we won 10 games “? I don’t think any other P5 team would have played those 3 teams last year and failed to score at all.
 
You know damn well what he meant by a team with a pulse. 93-0, those were teams with a pulse. But you conveniently have no explanation for that.

What kind of coach gets shutout by the 3 best teams he faces and just hangs his hat on “we won 10 games “? I don’t think any other P5 team would have played those 3 teams last year and failed to score at all.
No, he seemed to imply that this year's ISU team had a pulse.

To me, they all have a pulse.

Btw, for those of us that do 1st grade math, the games I'm assuming you're referring to ended up 92-0.

But that doesn't mean a thing to me other than 0-3. Yes, I have a simple explanation for the 3 losses. And I have thorough explanation for why the scores of those losses are meaningless. But you guys don't listen anyway, so I'll save myself the time
 
Meaning you don't have an explanation at all. That's a cowardly look.
I think people know me well for backing up my positions with thorough explanation, whether they agree or not.

It just gets old sometimes. I take the time to lay out very sound reasoning and you guys will act like you have no idea what I'm talking about, mischaracterize what I've said, or say "TLDR".

You are the only poster who has accused me of waffling or being a coward. I have no insecurities with my posts.

The 92-0 narrative is incredibly annoying though, so when I have more time and energy, I will destroy it for you
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AEG82 and 83Hawk
I think people know me well for backing up my positions with thorough explanation, whether they agree or not.

It just gets old sometimes. I take the time to lay out very sound reasoning and you guys will act like you have no idea what I'm talking about, mischaracterize what I've said, or say "TLDR".

You are the only poster who has accused me of waffling or being a coward. I have no insecurities with my posts.

The 92-0 narrative is incredibly annoying though, so when I have more time and energy, I will destroy it for you
[/QUOTE
I imagine the 92-0 fact would be incredibly annoying to you. I can’t wait to hear your sound reasoning that will that explain it away. Unless waiting until you have more time and energy means that you really have nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 83Hawk
I think people know me well for backing up my positions with thorough explanation, whether they agree or not.

I think people know you for being a pretentious pest with "facts" that support only your stance regardless of whether any of it is accurate or not. You project your holier-than-though stance on all of us lesser mortals, which, is ALL of the time. You're the self-appointed arbiter of truth but the rest of us never got that memo apparently. On top of that, most of what you say is ridiculous and over the top designed to get a reaction, which, I must say, bravo. You're always the center of attention it appears.

Usually, when an entire board reacts negatively towards you, which we all do from what I've seen, including your perceived allies, it's a hint. Here's your hint, this post is a hint! How can somebody who's so wrong all of the time essentially think they know what's right, all of the time?

You weren't always this elitist from what I recall. I don't know what happened to you nor do I really care but your schtick is unbearable quite frankly.
 
Last edited:
Exactly the kind of response I expected from you Eyes. A laughing emoji. I basically just called you everything but a bitch directly and that's your response. Noted.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: eyesofhawk
Exactly the kind of response I expected from you Eyes. A laughing emoji. I basically just called you everything but a bitch directly and that's your response. Noted.
What, did you want me to get into a name-calling contest?

There was nothing football related in your post to respond to.

I don't care about being called names. I don't know any of you and you don't know me. I care about the coaches and players being disrespected
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AEG82 and 83Hawk
What, did you want me to get into a name-calling contest?

There was nothing football related in your post to respond to.

I don't care about being called names. I don't know any of you and you don't know me. I care about the coaches and players being disrespected
Didn't call you any names actually. I'm stating recognizable perceptions about you and just giving you a courtesy. Apparently, ones you must be used to hearing. I wanted you to tell me that you aren't actually those things. That you don't view yourself as our moral compass. Alas, you answered the question regardless.
 
  1. McNamara looked good early with the scripted plays, and a team having early success against ISU’s defense is pretty standard practice because ISU always comes out extremely vanilla on D to see what the other team is trying to do and then make adjustments. As soon as ISU started bringing pressure McNamara buckled like a belt. I believe he likely does look really good in practice when it’s essentially running a 7-on-7 game. But once he had to move around and avoid getting hit I mean it was really bad.

This makes a lot of sense. Iowa will be seeing defensive schemes geared to blitzing the rest of the year and with Cade back there, it will be ugly.
 
Just put him on ignore, man.

Makes this board - & the bb board - so much more palatable

We're all here to be entertained, correct?​

Well you can't ask for better entertainment than having the inspiration for SIMPLE JACK posing as an adult on a message board.
I say we keep him and encourage him to contribute more. He's a one man army boosting the self-esteem of thousands, possibly millions. I propose we all respond to his posts with, "THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 83Hawk and AEG82

We're all here to be entertained, correct?​

Well you can't ask for better entertainment than having the inspiration for SIMPLE JACK posing as an adult on a message board.
I say we keep him and encourage him to contribute more. He's a one man army boosting the self-esteem of thousands, possibly millions. I propose we all respond to his posts with, "THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE".
The resilience is impressive if nothing else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Champ_Kind_whammy
Exactly. I was disappointed in the outcome, but after an hour or so I was alright. I know a gopher fan up here that gave up his season tickets after 40 years. I should have asked what took him so long watching that team 😆

Likewise. 10 years ago, I would’ve been raging pissed. On Saturday when the FG went through?, it was kinda like the reaction of aunt Edna eating the dog piss sandwich



f7ccsc9c817d1.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT