No snarky backhanded answers - "America is more racist than I thought" etc. What did you really miss on?
For me:
- The terrible Republican ground game, and the awesome Democratic ground game, didn't really matter. Maybe the ground game doesn't matter so much in the era of highly polarized, high turnout elections. I thought this would be Trump's downfall
- I think Vance overall was a good selection. I thought it was a terrible one at the time. But despite some misteps (the pet-eating thing particularly), his ability to sit and have long, in-depth conversations with outlets, and come off very well and smart in that environment, was a very good compliment to Trump, and a huge contrast to the Harris/Waltz campaign
- Harris ultimately acquitted herself pretty well up to the limitations of her natural political abilities and the fundamentals against her. She had some moments she'd like to have back (that nothing different from Biden answer), but she never really had a total meltdown WTF moment the entire time. She was pretty disciplined, she had a really strong debate in a format that doesn't favor her, and she by all accounts seemed to work very very hard (a reputation she didn't always have as VP). I think she was a poor candidate, but I think she did better on the trail than probably should have been expected. Honestly, I've called her a really terrible candidate, but I thought she was an F, and she really was more of a solid C.