Yeah, I hear that from a lot of guys who think they should have scored better than they did
It is what it is....an executive course. The original 18 has 9 par 4s and 9 par 3s. The new 9 has a par 5 and four each par 3 and 4. Moreover, the par 4 holes are short, ranging from 240 to 400 yards. It's a great place to work on your short game. It's almost always in excellent condition. There's also a very large driving range and two putting greens. With 27 holes, you can usually get on without much of a wait. If it isn't busy, you can walk 18 in under 3 hours, or ride it in 2. As mentioned earlier, the greens are challenging. Several of the par three holes are as difficult as any you'll find in the area.
But if you want to play a traditional par-72 championship course, obviously it isn't where you should go. Long hitters will seldom use their driver. There is water, but no sand and very few trees. It's jammed together -- newbies frequently get confused as to what hole they're playing. And depending upon the day and time, you can find it crowded with beginners, or with outings by groups that comprise people who don't play golf very often. It is almost always windy, whether the wind is blowing anywhere else or not. If you don't know the course, this can really screw you up. For instance, on #14, a downhill 200-yard par 3, this year alone I've hit anywhere from a 9 iron to a driver.
While my first sentence here was in jest, as indicated by the smiley face, there's a lot of truth to it. Good golfers expect to score extremely well, and when they don't -- which is frequently the case -- they get frustrated. I'm secretary of the men's association, and a few years ago I did some research and found that the members actually average better scores (relative to par) at the area's traditional layouts. When the Greater Cedar Rapids Open pro-am was moved there because of flooding at Hunter's Ridge in '08, the professionals only averaged par or better on 1 of the par threes.