ADVERTISEMENT

Which Seniors Seek Waivers to Come Back Next Year?

IowasLaw

HB All-State
Nov 19, 2019
577
2,908
93
This year's squad is an interesting mix of young talent and solid seniors who are good for the system but later round NFL draft picks at best (and more likely practice squad types). Aside from Nixon, a junior, he only senior on the roster with any credible NFL buzz right now is Alaric Jackson, and he certainly hasn't helped his draft stock this year.

For the first time in college football history, the NCAA has granted waivers to everyone on the team should they want an extra year of eligibility in this COVID shortened year. So which of the 15 seniors currently in Iowa's two deeps thinks it's worth it to come back for, in many cases, a 6th year of college to pursue their dream of making an NFL roster or playing for a Big 10 title? Here's my guess on who comes back and who is done with Iowa and ready to pursue the NFL:

COMES BACK IN 2021

-Coy Cronk. This year hasn't worked out the way this 4 year starter at Indiana had hoped. His old team is actually better than his new one, and he has barely seen the field at Iowa both due to a benching and another injury. Before the season, his NFL prospects seemed almost guaranteed, but he's yet to prove that he's recovered from a bad injury last year. At this point, it's unlikely he will be drafted, so he can either move on from the sport or use the opportunity to come back bigger and better next year.

-Cole Banwart. Iowa produces NFL OL. According to pro football focus, Banwart has the 12th highest rating for a guard in college football. He may already be a late round draft pick if he leaves, but if he comes back it could make him a few million dollars in draft positioning.

-Jack Heflin. Another grad transfer who came in with high hopes. He's a mainstay on the DL this year, but is overshadowed by all the talent around him. With another year of seasoning, Heflin has a shot at the NFL.

-Zach VanValkenburg. This guy's a stud, and keeps getting better each week. Could he be a late round draft pick this year? Possible? Epenesa was a super star freak and he wasn't drafted until #54 overall, so there's nothing guaranteed. With one more year anchoring the DL, Zach could be a star next year with a 2 year body of work rather than 1.

-Caleb Shudak. On most teams in the country, Shudak would likely be their star kicker. At Iowa, he's been playing behind a 1st team all-American and has been relegated to kickoff duties, which he's excelled at. Next year, if Duncan doesn't seek a 7th year of eligibility, Shudak would be the man and could fulfill his dream of starting for the Hawks.

-Shaun Beyer. After 5 years on campus, Beyer is finally starting to emerge as more than just a role player. He's clearly got the size and the hands, now he just needs the reps to improve his film/stats. With LaPorta coming back, he won't be the star, but it could be a watered down Fant/Hockenson situation at TE.

ROLL THE DICE ON THE NFL

-Brandon Smith & Ihmir Smith Marsette. Unfortunately for these guys, Nate Stanley graduated last year and they were robbed of a chance to showcase their skill sets as seniors. Smith is a tall, strong, fast receiver who runs the deep routes with a QB terrified to throw it down field. Smith Marsette is a stud special teams player who never gets kicked to on kickoffs and who was beat out on punt returns. Neither will see more opportunities next year if they come back, so they will have to roll the dice and hope to catch on as free agents somewhere.

-Alaric Jackson. Jackson thought he would declare for the NFL a year ago, but nagging injuries and caution from scouts forced him to come back. He's improved his game a bit, but not to the level many predicted. He's probably Iowa's best draft prospect right now, but I'd guess he's a 5th rounder at best. Should he come back for another year? Probably. Will he? Probably not.

-Mekhi Sargent. I really like Sargent's game. He's slightly quicker and more powerful than Goodson, but he doesn't quite have the sizzle. As a result, if he comes back next year, he'll never be the feature back he was in 2018 and won't really improve his stock. Look for Sargent to try to catch on as a free agent somewhere.

-Chauncey Golston. Golston is a leader on defense and has done just about everything he can do as a Hawk. Another year wouldn't really benefit him, so I'm guessing he'll forgo the opportunity to come back and start preparing for the NFL once the season is over.

-Keith Duncan. Keith loves Iowa City and loves being a Hawk. With that said, he's been on campus forever and will never be able to top the year he had last year as runner up for the Groza award. Duncan probably doesn't have the leg for the NFL, and won't develop one by coming back an extra year. Look for him to give it a shot, then be a success in the real world wherever he lands.

-Matt Hankins. Hankins hasn't quite taken his game to the next level from last year as many hoped (37 tackles, 2 int last year, 24 tackles 1 int this year) and Iowa's streak of having the Big 10's defensive back of the year will likely end. But Hankins has had a solid career and deserves a shot at the NFL. Whether he sticks like Amani Hooker, or is more of a Geno Stone is tbd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JupiterHawk
Would love to see Brandon Smith come back as he and Spencer continue to build chemistry. Played sparingly as a true frosh, was hurt and 25% less games this year feels like he has some left in the tank to come back and prove himself to scouts. Haven’t looked at receiving class coming out to see where he stacks this year.
 
I disagree strongly with the OP regarding Beyer. He'll be on an NFL roster next year. Regarding the other guys on the "comes back" list: If Cronk really wants to play for Ferentz, he'll return to get that opportunity, but he's got plenty of film for the scouts from his time at IU. Banwart has had injury issues in previous seasons, so he may want another year of development. Of the other guys, perhaps Shudak returns to get a chance at being the main kicker, but the rest move on.

On the other list, Brandon Smith and Matt Hankins are the best bets to return. Both are true seniors and still have yet to reach their potentials at this level.
 
Maybe Cronk comes back to have a good year while healthy. I think any shot at NFL is at guard. All the others have the film to try to make the NFL. I don’t think it makes sense for any to return. The risk of injury far outweighs the reward(none will shoot up draft boards with another year). The window to make money in NFL is short.
 
1. Cronk Been injured could use another year to recover
2. Shudak gets a chance to kick FGs finally
3. VanValkenberg really starting to come into his own this year after transferring. I think he’d gain the most out of all the guy with adding another year of tape.
4. Beyer don’t really see him coming back to back up Laporta again. Having a good year probably not going to gain a lot
5. Heflin maybe if he’s a big a fan as it’s been reported he’d like a full year as a hawk.

That’s the top 5 most likely to return and I’d say after 3 it’s pretty shaky.
 
Kirk has said he expects very few to come back.
 
I agree on Smith and Hankins..although we saw with Jackson it literally takes 4 games and you are a 2nd round draft pick..
 
Van Valkenberg is the only one on that list I could see improving his NFL prospects by coming back. He could add a few pounds of muscle. Cronk doesn't look to have much NFL potential; ditto Heflin. Heflin might come back because D line depth is a huge concern especially if Nixon goes.
 
Beyer is 24 y.o., 25 next season. HIGHLY doubt he comes back. Same with ISM and B Smith. No real reason for them to comeback.

Sargent? Doubtful. Another year does nothing for him. And besides, losing him gets IKM more time on the field, and gets the younger RBs a chance to develop.

Jackson isn't even top 2 for draft from the team. Nixon & Linderbaum have that honor, and I would submit Golston could go just as high as Jackson.
 
Van Valkenberg is the only one on that list I could see improving his NFL prospects by coming back. He could add a few pounds of muscle. Cronk doesn't look to have much NFL potential; ditto Heflin. Heflin might come back because D line depth is a huge concern especially if Nixon goes.
I don't think we know with Cronk. Would like to see what he could do with a fully offseason to work back into shape and get fully healthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NI hawk
Beyer is 24 y.o., 25 next season. HIGHLY doubt he comes back. Same with ISM and B Smith. No real reason for them to comeback.

Sargent? Doubtful. Another year does nothing for him. And besides, losing him gets IKM more time on the field, and gets the younger RBs a chance to develop.

Jackson isn't even top 2 for draft from the team. Nixon & Linderbaum have that honor, and I would submit Golston could go just as high as Jackson.

Smith didn't redshirt so he would only be a 5th year guy if he came back. Same for ISM, although he has more draft potential that Smith. Maybe some of the guys just want to have a normal season for their Senior year.
 
I’m assuming these guys will be ready to move on
That's the unfortunate part of this season. They never got the chance they would've regularly gotten to gel before they had to jump into Big Ten play where teams know how to scheme against Iowa's base concepts. Couple that with breaking in new faces and missing Jack Campbell on the defense and you get a slow, rough start.

Of course, I think we're also avoiding the elephant in the room.......which is that we probably would've lost to Iowa State in game 2 if our regular schedule was still in place. And that historically, under KF, hasn’t been a good thing for Iowa's final record. (Fortunately, we don't lose to them much anymore so we don't have to worry about it! 😁)
 
Let's not go nuts here. Beyer had a nice game against Illinois, but in 5 years at Iowa, his grand total for stats are:

18 catches, 275 yards, 1 td. Zero starts.

If that's enough to make an NFL roster, more power to him. But pretty much every starting TE in college football has those numbers or better. For example, this year alone, Iowa State's TE has 33 catches for 446 and 5 tds. Their backup TE has 15 catches for 209 and 2 tds.

Another year at Iowa to consistently average 4-5 catches a game and he'd be a legit draft prospect.


I disagree strongly with the OP regarding Beyer. He'll be on an NFL roster next year.
 
That's the unfortunate part of this season. They never got the chance they would've regularly gotten to gel before they had to jump into Big Ten play where teams know how to scheme against Iowa's base concepts. Couple that with breaking in new faces and missing Jack Campbell on the defense and you get a slow, rough start.

Of course, I think we're also avoiding the elephant in the room.......which is that we probably would've lost to Iowa State in game 2 if our regular schedule was still in place. And that historically, under KF, hasn’t been a good thing for Iowa's final record. (Fortunately, we don't lose to them much anymore so we don't have to worry about it! 😁)

I will never concede that we would "very likely lose to Iowa State.". They lost to Oklahoma St and Louisiana, not Notre Dame and Clemson. I have yet to see Iowa state handle Iowa up front under Campbell and haven't seen anything this year to change that. With the game at Kinnick we would be their toughest opponent of the year, easily.
 
Let's not go nuts here. Beyer had a nice game against Illinois, but in 5 years at Iowa, his grand total for stats are:

18 catches, 275 yards, 1 td. Zero starts.

If that's enough to make an NFL roster, more power to him. But pretty much every starting TE in college football has those numbers or better. For example, this year alone, Iowa State's TE has 33 catches for 446 and 5 tds. Their backup TE has 15 catches for 209 and 2 tds.

Another year at Iowa to consistently average 4-5 catches a game and he'd be a legit draft prospect.

Depends on what the NFL evaluations people state.
 
I will never concede that we would "very likely lose to Iowa State.". They lost to Oklahoma St and Louisiana, not Notre Dame and Clemson. I have yet to see Iowa state handle Iowa up front under Campbell and haven't seen anything this year to change that. With the game at Kinnick we would be their toughest opponent of the year, easily.

Hell no. Our D is stout and if you got a stout D you are in every damn game. Matty ain't never beat the Hawks. Will be funny if we waltz into Ames in 2021 and spoil their little Purdy/Hall last year party.
 
Let's not go nuts here. Beyer had a nice game against Illinois, but in 5 years at Iowa, his grand total for stats are:

18 catches, 275 yards, 1 td. Zero starts.

If that's enough to make an NFL roster, more power to him. But pretty much every starting TE in college football has those numbers or better. For example, this year alone, Iowa State's TE has 33 catches for 446 and 5 tds. Their backup TE has 15 catches for 209 and 2 tds.

Another year at Iowa to consistently average 4-5 catches a game and he'd be a legit draft prospect.
You need to review your research methods. Beyer had his 13th career start against Illinois (according to this week's game notes) and PFF has him ranked as the #3 TE nationally.
 
Smith didn't redshirt so he would only be a 5th year guy if he came back. Same for ISM, although he has more draft potential that Smith. Maybe some of the guys just want to have a normal season for their Senior year.

<<Maybe some of the guys just want to have a normal season for their senior year>>

I could buy that. But I still don't think Beyer, ISM or B Smith will stay, and will be completely happy if one, two, or all three DO stay.
 
Beyer is an excellent blocker and that’s primarily what he’s been used for until his senior season where he’s proving to be a bit more reliable in the passing game. If he makes an NFL roster it will likely be more due to his blocking ability.
 
That's the unfortunate part of this season. They never got the chance they would've regularly gotten to gel before they had to jump into Big Ten play where teams know how to scheme against Iowa's base concepts. Couple that with breaking in new faces and missing Jack Campbell on the defense and you get a slow, rough start.

Of course, I think we're also avoiding the elephant in the room.......which is that we probably would've lost to Iowa State in game 2 if our regular schedule was still in place. And that historically, under KF, hasn’t been a good thing for Iowa's final record. (Fortunately, we don't lose to them much anymore so we don't have to worry about it! 😁)
You mention that Iowa would probably would have lost to Ia. State. But then on the other other hand, getting to play three games before the B1G, would we have run the table and been in the conference championship?
Same way with Ia. State. They didn't win their first game against po-dunk-center so who's saying that Iowa wouldn't have kicked their butts also...???
 
You mention that Iowa would probably would have lost to Ia. State. But then on the other other hand, getting to play three games before the B1G, would we have run the table and been in the conference championship?
Same way with Ia. State. They didn't win their first game against po-dunk-center so who's saying that Iowa wouldn't have kicked their butts also...???
I'm not going to defend what I've said no matter how much people push back.......enjoy! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim4edwards
I seriously hope none of these guys come back. Some for maybe a 6th year in the program. No thanks, move along you had your chance.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bojihawk44
Being truthful no one knows who will come back and who won’t... why not let the season play out as there’s a ton of things that can happen between now and next year and Nixon could definitely come back like I know? Absolutely not .. but let’s wait and see and enjoy the F out of this season the way it’s been going who knows maybe they have other ideas on their mind besides the almighty dollar? It will definitely be fun if I see what transpires
 
  • Like
Reactions: David1979
I can think of only two Hawkeyes who came back for 6th seasons, and both had missed two seasons with injuries - Ben Sobieski in football and Jess Settles in basketball. Ben wanted a shot at the NFL and Jess wanted to play for Tom Davis' last hurrah.
 
Last edited:
Let's not go nuts here. Beyer had a nice game against Illinois, but in 5 years at Iowa, his grand total for stats are:

18 catches, 275 yards, 1 td. Zero starts.

If that's enough to make an NFL roster, more power to him. But pretty much every starting TE in college football has those numbers or better. For example, this year alone, Iowa State's TE has 33 catches for 446 and 5 tds. Their backup TE has 15 catches for 209 and 2 tds.

Another year at Iowa to consistently average 4-5 catches a game and he'd be a legit draft prospect.
Injuries really impacted his career.
 
People need to remember that football has a finite time you can play it and have your body hold up. If they have realistic NFL aspirations, I say go for it as soon as you can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: just_somebody
People need to remember that football has a finite time you can play it and have your body hold up. If they have realistic NFL aspirations, I say go for it as soon as you can.

Agreed. the only ones who should probably stick around are guys planning to go to grad school anyway (and not play football for a living), and thus can continue with all the benefits and resources of being a part of the football team.
 
That's the unfortunate part of this season. They never got the chance they would've regularly gotten to gel before they had to jump into Big Ten play where teams know how to scheme against Iowa's base concepts. Couple that with breaking in new faces and missing Jack Campbell on the defense and you get a slow, rough start.

Of course, I think we're also avoiding the elephant in the room.......which is that we probably would've lost to Iowa State in game 2 if our regular schedule was still in place. And that historically, under KF, hasn’t been a good thing for Iowa's final record. (Fortunately, we don't lose to them much anymore so we don't have to worry about it! 😁)

No way in a normal season we would have lost to them.
Petres would have time to gel. Oline would have been figured out. Isu had their qb back..and still lost to Louisiana on week one...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT