Maybe they were trying to save chis' life. He appeared to be on the verge of a heart attack. Holy buckets I wonder what his hangover is like this morning.
Who won the Walz v Vance debate?
- Thread starter binsfeldcyhawk2
- Start date
"I thought you weren't going to fact check" came across to me as "I get to lie as much as I want to."
went back through it and chis was in fact losing his mind...chis gonna chis I guess.
I'm honestly actually done with him. I was told not to keep pushing him and I won't. Seriously, he is not well. I think a timeout from here and the internet until well after the election would be very beneficial for him.
He hated having his lies fact checked.
He did say it but I think it was a misspeak. I watched the debate and he was nervous.
really? I checked in like twice and could totally see why it got shut down. Personal attacks everywhere.
Last edited:
And then they put him on mute bc he was mansplaining to the nation
Vance won on style. Walz won on substance.
It’ll be forgotten by the weekend.
It’ll be forgotten by the weekend.
I enjoyed the debate and it really highlighted how both Trump and Kamala have no business being POTUS.
Both candidates answered questions and both dodged.
I'd call it even with Vance being more polished.
Both candidates answered questions and both dodged.
I'd call it even with Vance being more polished.
Imagine losing your mind over a VP debate
Vance refused to answer whether TFG lost in 2020. I ain't gonna vote for a guy who doesn't respect my vote.
This morning’s after analysis says otherwise.
Walz had a tougher task. His running mate has yet to define her policy proposals and that made it tougher for him.
When you don’t define yourself your opposition will do it for you. And they won’t be generous.
Personally I give a lot of leeway when folks misspeak. No matter what folks think about Walz he didn't mean to say that.
It'll be a meme (already is) but it's a lazy "gotcha" IMO.
It's the standard nowadays and unfortunate. Edited clips etc....
Basically why long form interviews/press conferences will be a thing of the past. Nobody can stay on point and avoid misspeaking in those formats....
As we've seen in this election cycle campaigns will rely more and more on scripted settings and avoid any long format interviews and press conferences.
I never really paid attention to this before but it should tell you how gullible the Democratic Party is.
They win the presidential election and bring in a vice president. They know that vice president can be brain washed so they elect them as the next presidential candidate. 4 or 8 years later they repeat the same cycle. What’s really pathetic about it is that they don’t do anything great as vice president and yet they promote them to presidential candidate anyway.
Look at how much Harris is trying to separate herself from the current president that she is supposed to still be working under.
I wasn’t excluding him. I’m also not going to pretend NC/Ryan/Fran/etc weren’t goading him.
You should see how gullible current GOP voters are. That wasn’t a very well thought out post.
What cycle are you talking about? Clinton/Obama weren’t standing VP’s, but GWB was.
Those damn men and them firing back with actual information on the pen stroke the dems have used to make a huge group of people "legal".
The dems have a serious problem, it's very obvious heterosexual males are an inconvenience for the dem party and if you are a white one at that you are a necessary evil, even if your wife will vouch for you.
Much LOL.
Also, can you provide an example of the personal attacks? I asked in the thread last night, while chis was playing the victim, and no one could provide me with an answer. What personal attacks were you seeing? ( directed toward chis, God knows there were many of him using his military career to call us all useless)
There is a whole lot of childish stupidity in that thread. Made it a very tough read.
Yup. He lied as well as any lawyer that I've ever seen. Props for that.
Bro come on with the personal attacks thing. It was alcoholism this, and dui that every other thread. At one point Scruddy (or one of the qanon handles) told him his family doesn’t even love him.
Walz also lied and tried to claim the CBP one app laws have been around since the 90s. The left just doesn't want the masses to understand that those "legal" migrants are "legal" due to this nonsense that originated with the harris-biden administration.
Man, that describes so many on here, I've no clue who you're talking about.
I tried to give Chishawk an opportunity to set the record straight on all the accusations flung at him about having 3 DUI charges. Honestly, I have in the past told people to stop throwing out unfounded accusations against him—like the guy, can’t remember who off the top of my head, people would say was a wife beater.
Instead of Chishawk coming out and saying something to the effect of it being nonsense he lashed out at me for asking the question.
I won’t bring it up again, but draw your own conclusions.
I used to think the Obama/Romney debates were testy, now look like a jolly, good time. We badly need politics back to that and get away from all extremism.
Chis is not the victim, he got dished out everything he has deserved for his behavior over the years.
I missed the thread last night. It doesn’t sound like this will move the needle much. Think Vance is polished, but Walz landed the biggest punches.
Tie. They both had their moments and as I said 5 minutes into the debate, it won’t change a single vote.
It must have been one of the many handles that act and talk like you.
My point is that if a poster claims they didn’t see personal attacks in that thread, then they weren’t reading that thread.
Vance won the bulk of the night maybe 60-40, but dropped the ball on the 2 going in for the TD with his non-answer on who won the 2020 election.
He also gave up the second best sound bite of the debate on fact checking.
For Vance not to have an answer for the election winner and Walz not to have an answer for China is debate prep malpractice.
He also gave up the second best sound bite of the debate on fact checking.
For Vance not to have an answer for the election winner and Walz not to have an answer for China is debate prep malpractice.
Did I mention Clinton/Obama? Seems I went off the graphic of Obama/biden and Biden Harris.
How gullible is the GOP? That they elected Trump to run the last couple of elections when he wasn’t even a career politician before being elected? Most people that are actually part of the GOP can understand by now what stuff Trump says is bs and which is actually something he will try and accomplish. Whereas you’re programmed dem candidates just say what they are supposed to say and not actually work on accomplishing anything. “I grew up middle class” Hahahah hahahaha don’t try and break into my house because I’ll shoot you hahahahah hahaha.
Pretty much agree but that might be an overstatement. Might change a few but won't move the needle much IMO.
What is the discernment of a personal attack? Calling someone a POS for who they vote or acknowledging past factual information?
