This annoys me to no end, because the further you extend the larger gaps there are between you and the help defenders on either side.
It's one thing if you are going out there to contest the ball, or to disrupt the play, but we never really contest the ball and in the case with the shot clock under 15 seconds, it's clearly going to be a 1 on 1 dribble penetration with or without a screen and I see no reason to go beyond 20-22 feet (assuming they can shoot the pull up 3, which isn't always true either). I don't believe going out to meet the ball at 25-30 feet helps avoid any picks when all is said and done, so it's unnecessary imo.
We are not great at keeping guys in front of us, and Minnesota getting into the paint was their primary offense last night.
Anyone have a different perspective on that practice?
It's one thing if you are going out there to contest the ball, or to disrupt the play, but we never really contest the ball and in the case with the shot clock under 15 seconds, it's clearly going to be a 1 on 1 dribble penetration with or without a screen and I see no reason to go beyond 20-22 feet (assuming they can shoot the pull up 3, which isn't always true either). I don't believe going out to meet the ball at 25-30 feet helps avoid any picks when all is said and done, so it's unnecessary imo.
We are not great at keeping guys in front of us, and Minnesota getting into the paint was their primary offense last night.
Anyone have a different perspective on that practice?