He was. He came off the bench. Played limited minutes. Played well in bigger games. Then he began to start and play more minutes and he was awful.Decent? You're entitled to your opinion.
He was. He came off the bench. Played limited minutes. Played well in bigger games. Then he began to start and play more minutes and he was awful.Decent? You're entitled to your opinion.
I will agree with this to an extent.
Running off Joe Toussaint was one of Fran’s biggest flubs in terms of roster management.
Joe T. was really valuable to WVU and T-Tech. He should’ve got more run at Iowa.
Which is why Iowa didn’t do shit in March.Connor was one of Iowa's most important players his last two years.
He was. He came off the bench. Played limited minutes. Played well in bigger games. Then he began to start and play more minutes and he was awful.
If you are looking at the offensive stats (scoring) .............. they weren't consistent game to game but he had enough good scoring games to elevate his average to adequate numbers.He was. He came off the bench. Played limited minutes. Played well in bigger games. Then he began to start and play more minutes and he was awful.
Again, entitled to your own opinion about Connor but could not agree lessYou obviously don't like the Mac clan, which is your choice, but without Connor, Iowa would have won a lot fewer games his last two years, especially his senior year. I probably agree with your opinion of Patrick.
Fair point, but I don't think we really know whether the Mac boys hurt recruiting. Connor didn't play PG his senior year. Hard to say what position Patrick was playing.Patrick was actually decent his first couple years. Connor also really hurt recruiting. Any guard recruit would seriously have to question coming to Iowa and having to compete with the coaches son, who’s going to get every chance to play and then some. Ask Joe T.