It is interesting that the article says he is no longer being viewed as a suspect in the case...but sounds like the case is still open. So either he was able to prove he wasn't the one who assaulted the victim, but he did have his DNA found (consensually with the victim maybe earlier?)…or the DNA wasn't a match or was inconclusive?
When asked what circumstances led to Foster no longer being investigated, Walter said, "the case is still under investigation. Evidence has suggested that (Foster) no longer is a suspect."
So...it sounds like they think there was an assault if the case is being investigated, but he's not a suspect. So...what I don't understand how you name him, or pick him out, if you are the victim reporting the assault...it's not like there are a lot of 6'10" black guys with blond dyed hair that you would have mistakenly ID'ed him...right...???