Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get the flu shot every year due to work. And, I'll say in 20 years I had the flu once when the strain I had wasn't included in the shot I received that year. I asked why all strains aren't included and don't recall the answer... just know that they aren't for some reason. Anyway, never had side effects and I'd say it's been effective.
There are 131 subtypes of influenza. It is unnecessary to vaccinate for all types.Get the flu shot every year due to work. And, I'll say in 20 years I had the flu once when the strain I had wasn't included in the shot I received that year. I asked why all strains aren't included and don't recall the answer... just know that they aren't for some reason. Anyway, never had side effects and I'd say it's been effective.
Tucker Carlson approves this message.The rest of you suckers can take the risk and get the vaccination but I'm not getting any shot until I do the smart thing and see what the GOP talking heads recommend!
It's almost as if distancing, masks, and improved sanitary awareness reduced the spread the last few years.It's almost as if our immune systems are weakened.
I'm sure that is a large part of it.I wonder if this has much to do with the amount of people getting tested for COVID.
Before COVID, if I got the flu I got the flu and that was it without a thought of even seeing a doctor about it.
Now, I'm likely going in to get tested for COVID, which results in a positive flu test.
Disclaimer: This is not me downplaying the impact of this year's flu numbers or discrediting the data in the tweets. This is just me wondering if some, or much, of this is due to more people being tested that would have previously just ridden it out at home for a few days.
Now it's correct. You are welcome.It's almost as if distancing, masks, and improved sanitary awareness DELAYED the spread the last few years.
It's almost as if distancing, masks, and improved sanitary awareness reduced the spread the last few years.
It's almost as if distancing, masks, and improved sanitary awareness reduced the spread the last few years.
Now it's correct. You are welcome.
set our children’s social and academic education backwards permanently. But, hey, flu was down for a couple seasons!
Now it's correct. You are welcome.
WTF is this nonsense?Posts like the OP are just fear mongering.
1. Influenza has not changed.
5. Your body develops some immunity after an influenza infection. So this is equivalent to getting the vaccine.
It was called something else that year.I more like that 2020 doesn't even make the chart. Nobody seemed to get the flu that year.
NoIt was called something else that year.
Well apparently 'they' did a sh!tty job predicting this year and should all become meteorologists.There are 131 subtypes of influenza. It is unnecessary to vaccinate for all types.
They vaccinate for the types that are predicted to be most prevalent that year.
NopeWell apparently 'they' did a sh!tty job predicting this year and should all become meteorologists.
Same for the vaccine. The vaccine only reduces the risk of flu illness by 40-60% during seasons that are well matched to the ones used to make the vaccine.This is only partly true
Vaccinations provide you a consistent level of protection; depending on your exposure to actual flu (your viral inoculum), your level of actual protection may vary.
Generally, even in less-matched seasons, it reduces the severity of the illness people have, if they get exposed.Same for the vaccine. The vaccine only reduces the risk of flu illness by 40-60% during seasons that are well matched to the ones used to make the vaccine.
Food Chemical Toxicology isn't a "journal mainstay" for my vaccine informationThis suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436552/
This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436552/
That is, indeed, what UIHC is requiring at their facilities for visitorsWow, flu is really high? Put your mask back on
They never stopped.That is, indeed, what UIHC is requiring at their facilities for visitors
You can justify your ideas all you want, but what I said was straight from the cdc website. I have a feeling that they are not underselling the effectiveness of the vaccine. The best case is 40-60% effectiveness.Generally, even in less-matched seasons, it reduces the severity of the illness people have, if they get exposed.
Which is another reason the vaccines are very useful/effective: they can shorten the duration of infectiousness for those who are exposed, and thus lower the R0 rate of spread.
Pretty sure Peter McCullough may have just a bit more credibility than HROT’s Joe Nye the Science Guy. Could be wrong.Food Chemical Toxicology isn't a "journal mainstay" for my vaccine information
Yes, that has to be part of it. When someone comes in with respiratory symptoms we do a broad panel of testing now including flu.I wonder if this has much to do with the amount of people getting tested for COVID.
Before COVID, if I got the flu I got the flu and that was it without a thought of even seeing a doctor about it.
Now, I'm likely going in to get tested for COVID, which results in a positive flu test.
Disclaimer: This is not me downplaying the impact of this year's flu numbers or discrediting the data in the tweets. This is just me wondering if some, or much, of this is due to more people being tested that would have previously just ridden it out at home for a few days.