ADVERTISEMENT

Your football board is amusing.

couple of corrections on a few of your points in each post.

MK has only missed 3 XP's, not 4 and one was due to a very poor hold and spot. He is 5-5 on kicks over 50yds, so that kick against Pitt, while certainly no gimme, was far from lucky or fortunate. Kid has a cannon.

ISU would not be 4-2 with a couple fortunate bounces. You point to the fumble recovery for a td vs Iowa; well MV was following the whole play. Sure he could have muffed the recovery, but that would have been more of a blown play on his part. Iowa also fumbled going in for the lead late in the 4th. That game was closer than the score indicated, but ISU did nothing on offense in the 2nd half that scared anyone. That wasn't TCU, TTEch, or Baylor's D you were playing that Saturday. Congrats tho, your 17 points was higher than the average total Iowa is giving up this year.

ISU would be 2-5 with Iowa's schedule if you swapped out Iowa/ISU as you can't play yourself obviously. You aren't winning in Madison or Evanston, nor would you beat Illinois. I'm guessing Ill St would give you all you could handle, but I bet you pull it out.
And you clearly aren't reading what I write. So I guess there's not much point in writing something else.
 
Or I can stay here, despite the fact that a few here are complete jackasses. Most have been decent though, so I think I'll stay. I assume you live in some small town that doesn't like change or outsiders?

You'll get your wish that I'll avoid the kindergarten you call a football board. That place is the definition of short man syndrome.

GFY, and keep your ignorant posts on a Michigan board where your stupidity wont be as noticeable. thanxbye
 
Again, you guys love to twist things out of context. While I'm quite comfortable and not embarrassed to say so, I also only responded that way because he said "Guy living in his mom's basement..." Usually it's guys that have never been successful that make statements like that.

Nah. It's guys who go as far out their way as you have to instigate a group of fans who have never been successful. Based on your comments--and the fact that you even started the thread to begin with--you are the very picture of someone who has too much time on their hands. Successful people don't have a lot of time on their hands.
 
Nah. It's guys who go as far out their way as you have to instigate a group of fans who have never been successful. Based on your comments--and the fact that you even started the thread to begin with--you are the very picture of someone who has too much time on their hands. Successful people don't have a lot of time on their hands.
Like Torbee.......................................................................
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Nah. It's guys who go as far out their way as you have to instigate a group of fans who have never been successful. Based on your comments--and the fact that you even started the thread to begin with--you are the very picture of someone who has too much time on their hands. Successful people don't have a lot of time on their hands.

Guys like me have time, because I spend my time doing deals - not working 40-60 hours for somebody else for peanuts. Nice try though.
 
Say what you will, but I'm not in my parents basement and im not in Battle Creek. I have no doubt my net worth dwarfs yours, so stay in the shallow end where you belong.
images
 
It's not that hard to believe. I work like that. You don't have to be a genius to do what I do, thank god.

Oh I don't have any problem believing it can be done (working for yourself instead of trading hours for dollars for a boss).

I just don't believe he's doing it.
 
Based upon what?

I agree that I THINK he's a good coach and Michigan looks like a fine team but I'll hold out on anointing him the best coach in the country until he has recruited and won with his guys.
Well with what he did at Stanford and the turn around he has made so far at Michigan I would put him up with the top coaches.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT