Ever wanted to see where Kim Reynolds gets her marching orders from, directly?
So disgusting and pathetic that out-of-state special interest groups own the Iowa GOP which are mere puppets.
by TIM MINELLA
Iowa is the latest state where Goldwater has defeated the scourge of discriminatory “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) initiatives taking over public higher education. The state adopted a Goldwater Institute reform, which Governor Kim Reynolds signed into law last week, that abolishes DEI bureaucracies at public universities—building on the Iowa Board of Regents’ decision to cut most DEI programs in November. And the news follows similar actions in North Carolina and Wyoming in the past week, as decisionmakers across the country realize that wasteful and toxic DEI programs have no place at public institutions of higher education.
Iowa’s legislation is based closely on the recommendations of the Goldwater Institute and the Manhattan Institute for abolishing DEI bureaucracies—a policy that clearly defines the actions that are prohibited. This specificity prevents universities from sidestepping DEI prohibitions by simply renaming or reorganizing existing DEI positions and programs. As Steve McGuire, an expert on academic freedom at the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, commented, “One of the chief contributions of the anti-DEI legislation in Iowa is to define DEI (and thus what is banned).” Among other actions, the Iowa legislation prohibits:
Timothy K. Minella is a Senior Fellow at the Goldwater Institute’s Van Sittert Center for Constitutional Advocacy.
Get Involved- DONATE
- Search
Victory! Goldwater Defeats DEI in Iowa
May 16, 2024by TIM MINELLA
Iowa is the latest state where Goldwater has defeated the scourge of discriminatory “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) initiatives taking over public higher education. The state adopted a Goldwater Institute reform, which Governor Kim Reynolds signed into law last week, that abolishes DEI bureaucracies at public universities—building on the Iowa Board of Regents’ decision to cut most DEI programs in November. And the news follows similar actions in North Carolina and Wyoming in the past week, as decisionmakers across the country realize that wasteful and toxic DEI programs have no place at public institutions of higher education.
Iowa’s legislation is based closely on the recommendations of the Goldwater Institute and the Manhattan Institute for abolishing DEI bureaucracies—a policy that clearly defines the actions that are prohibited. This specificity prevents universities from sidestepping DEI prohibitions by simply renaming or reorganizing existing DEI positions and programs. As Steve McGuire, an expert on academic freedom at the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, commented, “One of the chief contributions of the anti-DEI legislation in Iowa is to define DEI (and thus what is banned).” Among other actions, the Iowa legislation prohibits:
- “Any effort to promote differential treatment of or provide special benefits to individuals on the basis of race, color, or ethnicity.”
- “Any effort to promote or promulgate policies and procedures designed or implemented with reference to race, color, or ethnicity.”
- Attempts to have a public university take an official position on several widely disputed ideas, including “microaggressions,” “social justice,” “intersectionality,” and “neo-pronouns.”
Timothy K. Minella is a Senior Fellow at the Goldwater Institute’s Van Sittert Center for Constitutional Advocacy.