ADVERTISEMENT

Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace are stalking a co-worker

Mace and Boebert created some drama by demanding a man be removed from a bathroom in the Capitol. They were attempting to continue their grift off of trans bigotry by targeting their co-worker Sarah McBride.
It was not McBride in the bathroom. Will Speaker Johnson allow such harassment in the workplace?
  • Like
Reactions: gohawks50 and Moral

OT: Any Creighton Blue Jay men’s fans in here…

I don’t post on the men’s board at all, in fact, I don’t read it at all, but I know there are a lot of smart knowledgeable basketball fans in here and I was just curious what their thoughts were.

I’ve been a closet fan for years, but in particular the last 10. What an oddity they are. I swear to God every year they start out ranked, at least since McDermott has been there, go through a stretch where they lose 4, 5, 6 games in a stretch of nine or 10 and then turn it back on at the end of the season.?!

I mean every single year. Now I know they had a player hurt early in the year, but what a strange team.

Man sentenced to nearly 500 years in prison for dogfighting crimes

don’t fock with dogs bro

PAULDING COUNTY, Ga. (WANF/Gray News) - A man was sentenced to nearly 500 years in prison for his role in a dogfighting operation.

Vincent Lemark Burrell was arrested in 2022 after deputies discovered 106 dogs at his home in Paulding County, Georgia.

The Paulding County Sheriff’s Office and the Paulding County Marshal’s Office executed a warrant at Burrell’s home and found the dogs tied to fence posts using heavy chains.


They also found “documents linking Burrell’s dogs to other known dog fighters” and contracts for some of the dogs, according to the district attorney’s office.

Authorities said the dogs were “basically left in the elements with little to no shelter” and were not being seen by a veterinarian regularly.

Dogs were also found in the basement of the home where the presence and odor of urine and feces were so strong, that authorities said they had to wear protective equipment just to be able to safely enter the home.

“Conditions where dogs were being housed, both inside and on the exterior of this property, were not fit for humans, much less dogs,” authorities said.

Burrell was convicted of 93 counts of dog fighting and 10 counts of cruelty to animals. He was sentenced to 475 years in prison.



Login to view embedded media
  • Like
Reactions: NoWokeBloke

The Creation of Bill Clinton's Deep State

This one should be fun. Saw it on my crazy MAGA Uncle's FB page.

--------------------
Trump is Firing Government Employees, but He Learned from the Master: Bill Clinton and the Birth of the Deep State

As President Donald Trump announces plans to restructure the federal government and remove entrenched left-wing activist bureaucrats , the Left has reacted with outrage. Many claimed that such firings are an unprecedented attack on the civil service. However, history tells a different story. The blueprint for mass firings in the federal government was not drafted by Trump—it was authored by President Bill Clinton.

The Creation of Bill Clinton's Deep State

For the record, President Bill Clinton took drastic action upon entering office, firing all federal appointees and those reporting directly to them, reaching three levels deep into the management hierarchy. This included upper-level, middle-level, and lower-level managers. Such sweeping dismissals were unprecedented in modern history.

The stated reason for these actions was to reform government and make it more efficient. Under the guise of the 1993 "Reinventing Government Initiative," Clinton oversaw the termination of 377,000 federal employees. This initiative, led by then-Vice President Al Gore, was marketed as an effort to cut bureaucratic bloat. Clinton publicized that his administration reduced the government payroll from 2.15 million employees to 1.79 million by the end of his term (U.S. Office of Personnel Management). However, while he claimed to be trimming the size of government, he was in reality expanding it dramatically.
Rather than actually reducing the government’s reach, Clinton tripled its size by shifting millions of jobs to government contractors. This maneuver allowed his administration to hide the true expansion of government within the bureaucracy. The federal workforce, under his administration, effectively grew from 2.15 million to a staggering 9.1 million (Project On Government Oversight), all hired by liberal activist managers.

This restructuring was the foundation for what has become the “deep state”—an unelected bureaucratic class that exercises significant influence over government operations, often in opposition to elected leaders who challenge the status quo. The same entity that Trump is now attempting to confront was a product of Clinton’s drastic reshaping of the federal workforce.

Setting the Precedent for Trump’s Actions

The Democrats are framing Trump's efforts to remove government employees as radical and dangerous. Yet, Clinton, a Democrat, set the precedent for such dismissals. The key difference is that while Clinton’s actions were aimed at consolidating power within a left-leaning bureaucracy, Trump’s efforts have been directed at reducing that bureaucracy’s grip on governance and returning government to the people.

Trump’s battle against the entrenched federal workforce is not an attack on democracy—it is an attempt to undo a system that was carefully crafted over decades to resist conservative leadership. The idea that federal employees should be immune from accountability is a modern invention, and Clinton himself showed that mass firings could be justified in the name of reform.

As the debate over federal employment rages on, it is important to remember who first wielded the axe. Trump may be making headlines for firing government employees, but he is merely following in the footsteps of the master—Bill Clinton.

Judge Declines to Block Musk Team’s Foray Into Federal Agencies

Guess who:

A federal judge in Washington gave President Trump a victory for now when she declined on Tuesday to bar Elon Musk and his associates from having access to data at seven federal agencies or involvement in mass firings.

In an order on Tuesday, Judge Tanya S. Chutkan in Federal District Court in Washington, wrote that a coalition of 14 state attorneys general had failed in seeking an emergency halt to show specific examples of how Mr. Musk’s team’s sweeping data collection efforts could cause those states imminent or irreparable harm.

“The court is aware that DOGE’s unpredictable actions have resulted in considerable uncertainty and confusion for plaintiffs and many of their agencies and residents,” Judge Chutkan wrote, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency tasked with carrying out Mr. Musk’s vision. “But the ‘possibility’ that defendants may take actions that irreparably harm plaintiffs ‘is not enough.’”
The ruling by Judge Chutkan reflected the atmosphere of confusion surrounding the purpose and goals of Mr. Musk’s team, which judges in a number of court cases have repeatedly and unsuccessfully asked government lawyers to clarify.
It also reflected what Judge Chutkan described as the considerable uncertainty about what future cuts and layoffs could result from Mr. Musk’s effort to shrink the federal work force, which has resulted in the termination of hundreds of federal contracts and thousands of workers in recent weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT