ADVERTISEMENT

Civil rights groups and 22 states sue to stop order to end birthright citizenship

A coalition of 18 states, including New Jersey, New York and California, filed a lawsuit in Massachusetts, saying the order violates the constitutional rights of thousands of children and imposes undue costs on local jurisdictions that would lose federal funding tied to Medicaid and children’s health insurance. The District of Columbia and city of San Francisco also joined that filing.

Another group of states, including Arizona and Washington, filed a separate legal challenge Tuesday afternoon. And the American Civil Liberties Union and Lawyers for Civil Rights filed lawsuits in New Hampshire and Massachusetts, respectively, on behalf of parents whose children would not be eligible for citizenship under Trump’s order.

ADVERTISING


“The Constitution could not be more clear: citizenship of children born in the United States does not depend on the citizenship of their parents,” New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) said in a statement. “That principle is fundamental to who we are as a nation and what it means to be an American.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James said Trump’s action “is not just unconstitutional, it is profoundly dangerous.”
Trump signed the executive order shortly after his inauguration Monday. Titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” the order stipulates that his administration will no longer recognize automatic citizenship for children born on U.S. soil to immigrant parents who are in the country without authorization, provided neither parent is a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident. In his first term, Trump threatened to take similar action but did not follow through.


The order, which Trump said would take effect 30 days from its signing, also bars automatic citizenship for children born to noncitizen parents who are in the country on temporary work, student or tourist visas.
“That’s a good one — birthright,” Trump told reporters, while signing the document. “That’s a big one.”
Legal experts said the sweeping effort runs counter to more than a century of legal precedent and is unlikely to pass constitutional muster.
The plan also faces significant logistical hurdles. The administration plans to enforce Trump’s order by withholding documents, such as passports, from people it deems ineligible for citizenship. The order also says the administration will refuse to accept documents from local or state governments that purport to recognize the citizenship of the children it has deemed ineligible for citizenship.


But the administration hasn’t yet explained who — hospitals, health insurance companies, local or state governments, federal officials or some other authority — would review parents’ legal documents to assess whether their children could become citizens.



Civil liberties organizations have said birthright citizenship is protected under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. A legal case could ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court, in which conservative justices outnumber liberal ones, 6-3.
When a reporter asked whether the order could be called unconstitutional by a court, Trump responded: “Could be. I think we have good grounds, but you could be right. We’ll find out. It’s ridiculous. … People have wanted to do this for decades.”

Trump falsely said the United States is the only country that offers birthright citizenship. In fact, more than 30 countries do, including Canada, Mexico and the majority of South American nations.
  • Like
Reactions: Moral and BelemNole

Updated Numbers for Mid-Year Transfers

Hard-hitting journalism this afternoon for you guys.

Here's the list of new numbers each of the mid-year transfers will be wearing, at least for the spring.

Sam Phillips: #2
Hank Brown: #9 (Iowa SID just posted on X that Jaziun Patterson will be moving to #4)
Mark Gronowski: #11
Jonah Pace: #91
Bryce Hawthorne: #96

Jimmy Sullivan, as you all saw during the bowl game, will wear #3, as well.

The Luster on the Economy is going to Come Off in 2025

1. Tariffs​

Trump’s plans to impose sweeping tariffs are likely to be one of the biggest threats to the economy, experts say.

The president-elect has vowed to penalize the country’s largest trading partners by levying tariffs — an extra 10 percent on Chinese goods and 25 percent on imports from Mexico and Canada — that economists say could quickly raise prices. The necessities that could soon be getting costlier range from big-ticket items such as cars and appliances to everyday basics like groceries and gas. During his campaign, Trump also discussed sweeping tariffs on all imports, not just from those countries, which would affect even more goods if implemented.

“Tariffs make things more expensive,” Alex Durante, an economist at the Tax Foundation, a right-leaning think tank, told The Washington Post. “They shrink the economy, and they make people poorer.”

New tariffs could cost the average household nearly $3,000 next year, amounting to about 3 percent of their after-tax income, according to estimates from the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank.

Members of Trump’s transition team have pushed back against the idea that tariffs could spark widespread inflation. But economists say they’re bracing for an across-the-board hit that could dent economic growth, raise prices and spur job losses.

New tariffs, combined with retaliatory measures by other governments, could shave off 1.7 percent from U.S. gross domestic product and result in 1.4 million fewer American jobs, according to estimates from the Tax Foundation.

  • Like
Reactions: MitchLL and Torg

Recruits in action: Jan 17-18 RESULTS







It is great to be an Iowa Wrestling fan.

Go Hawks!

SJSU responds to volleyball player mass exodus after trans athlete scandal rocked program

The good & bad 12 games in…

We have lost 2 games vs undefeated teams on the road, that we could’ve won and I propose this Michigan State game we should’ve won. Both of these teams are likely top 15 teams next week. But I also doubt anyone had us 9-2 right now.

Lots of angry “reflexive” reactions in the game thread and I too was pissed. But there is lots of good as well.

Things I’ve been critical of…I do wish we could get Ava more minutes. She has more upside….

With that said here is why I’m sure she doesn’t yet. Neither one of those girls right now are getting the ball deep at 8 foot & wheeling very often for some reason and that includes AOG.,…why?!

Ava in particular had the ball within 5 foot with her shooting, hand free and rather than going up, she passed it for a turnover?! there’s clearly a confidence/trust issue by her and maybe the coaching staff right now?

Our press break, really isn’t that bad, but our propensity to dribble into half court traps by Sr guards is quite odd. Can’t be coached that way…. they are poor decisions, possibly because they’ve been sped up in a full court game and are in their heads. Lucy & KF had 12 TOs between them, that’s not a coaching issue.

We go through spurts where we can’t make shots, and there’s not a lot you can do except work through it. This was an expressly unique game in that we rely on Lucy to get in the lane and make five jumpers and she did not do that today.

Our out of bounds plays were poor today, and generally speaking they they’ve been decent. We do that wheel with Olson, McCabe, Affolter, etc., but that was not effective today and getting anything under the basket was nonexistent. It feels to me like we went away from Hannah when she got the third foul and we shouldn’t have.

Hanna‘s ability to break the press regardless of what some uninformed fan suggested is actually quite remarkable. She handled the ball a lot today and only had two turnovers. But again, they went away from her and I’m not sure why.

AOG, is suddenly reluctant to make a post move and I wonder why? Is it because she has lost the ball a few times & being told not to etc.?

Why do we keep throwing the ball in over the top when, we can’t execut it and she fumbles it away. Ava has missed a few too.
Now I think it’s reasonable to understand we do need to keep trying, but man are we bad at it?

Again, not a coaching issue unless you think they should take that out of their offense and that’s probably not reasonable. But it definitely is an execution issue.

As good as we are defensively, we have a lapse from time to time after a big made shot, that has to stop.

Ultimately every loss isn’t because the coach did a poor job this team is still working through some kinks. They haven’t had a bad loss, and the games they have lost were very winnable. Probably what makes it so frustrating.

But the over the top criticisms are silly to me…

I’m missing a couple things that I wish they'd do better and obviously I didn’t really even address the good, thoughts?

Get Ready for Higher Egg Prices!

In November and December 17.2 M egg-layers died as a result of avian flu. The egg shortage is coming and will be with us “for many months” according to American Food Markets.
Damn Trump and so much for his getting the price of eggs back to a $2/ dozen!

(I’m just being fair and holding Trump to the same standard as my MAGA friends held Biden to post-Covid…Fair is Fair!)
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT