Glad I'm on ignore. One less uninformed person who can't follow the conversation. My argument has been consistently about possession as you mentioned. You can't possess them without taking them. Ownership and custody are the words you're trying to use as are the others here. That is not the discussion.
And you can’t just take any document you wish when leaving office and try to keep them.
No thanks, you all started it as I told you before and it clearly gets to you because you can't help yourself but to bring it up. And who gives two shits that they are being allowed in district court. That's where the case is right now. It doesn't matter that it's "unusual". You libtards started all sorts of legal bastardization and now you want to raise hell on everything Cannon does. It's pathetic and hypocritical. I didn't see you boneheads on here complaining about Merchan and all his stupidity. You're hacks.
He can take all the documents with him and fulfill his statutory duty which was to separate them for transfer to NARA. There was no time limitation on doing that and NARA knew that. There is no criminal component here.
If this were the case, the search warrant would never have been issued, no charges would ever be filed.
I’d tell ym to stick to his area of expertise. Unfortunately from the CyberNinja thread he lacked an understanding of audits as well.
What type of briefs? Boxer briefs, traditional, or thong?
Sir, by definition, thongs are not briefs. Nor are boxers for that matter. Hence the personality test question "boxers or briefs?" (We've generally culled the thong wearers out of our employment applicant pool well before we get to this question.)
Point conceded on thong briefs counsel. But boxer briefs are a thing
Those things, and more traditional "tighty-whities" are simply subcategories of "briefs".Point conceded on thong briefs counsel. But boxer briefs are a thing
Boxer briefs - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Actually, I'd just assume that the brothers would use that as a pejorative, so it's fine.Tighty-whities. No need to be racist on here man.
Nobody on here personifies more, thinking they are an intellectual, but is the opposite, than you. You’re a dupe.
What’s really weird here, s that if you follow his logic that Trump could take anything he wanted and not return anything he didn’t want to, then that also means Biden keeping docs in his garage was also totally legit also.
Nice work misrepresenting what I've been saying. JFC. And Biden NEVER had the PRA, FPA, and PTA statutes as a defense.
Coming from one of the most incompetent posters on here isn't saying much. You ever going to back up anything you spew? Nope, you're a bomb thrower who is dumber than Joe and that's saying a lot.
It's a logical conclusion based on your previous posts.
There is at least one cursory look into AC’s actions by the Circuit court. I would assume if anything comes out of it that Jack Smith can then use that decision to bring his own motion to dismiss Cannon.*
Probably not much, because anyone can file a complaint
Can someone make a scorecard of the number of motions trump has won in this case vs Smith?
Another poor response. He does have them, the documents are literally presidential records. Were Biden's classified as presidential records? No, so shut up. They haven't presented them to the judge yet, either. There are other avenues of dismissal they have gone after.
