I don't. I know one side that was protesting included many, many white nationalists. Those protesting on that side, as Trump distinguished it, are not good people. And claiming they are, particularly by the President, is abhorrent.
“Very Fine People” Lie/Hoax Perpetrated by Democrats & MSM
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
I supplied 3 minutes of Trump outright denouncing white supremacy on about 40 different occasions. Thoughts?
6 bankruptcies! Why would anyone expect anything different? Casinos, no less!
Already differentiated for you. There is nothing inherently bad or evil about being gay. There is with white nationalism.
I'm guessing you see that differently which is one of the reasons you're deploreable.
The left doesn’t do nuance. Unless it’s ass holes in Minneapolis burning down local businesses. Then it’s “mostly peaceful protests with outside agitators causing trouble”, screaming about the “man with the umbrella!”
He lies a lot. A lot. He is counting on their votes and wants them to "stand by" in case he doesn't win.
You're a gullible dumbass.
As for Joe Biden:
Key Instances of Denouncement
- Inaugural Address (January 20, 2021)
uring his inaugural speech, President Biden stated:
- Joint Session of Congress (April 28, 2021):In his address to a joint session of Congress, Biden emphasized the need to tackle white supremacy:
- Remarks on Charlottesville (August 14, 2017)rior to his presidency, Biden also criticized the events in Charlottesville and the response to it. He wrote an op-ed for The Atlantic:
By not leaving immediately. You are judged by the those with whom you choose to associate.
There is no way in the world I would ever allow myself to be included in a white nationalist group under any circumstances.
Well shit, Riley. I can both sides the shit out of this one, bro.He lies a lot. A lot. He is counting on their votes and wants them to "stand by" in case he doesn't win.
You're a gullible dumbass.
As for Joe Biden:
Key Instances of Denouncement
- Inaugural Address (January 20, 2021)
- Joint Session of Congress (April 28, 2021):In his address to a joint session of Congress, Biden emphasized the need to tackle white supremacy:
- Remarks on Charlottesville (August 14, 2017)
Donald Trump has made several statements over the years denouncing racism and white nationalists. Here are some key instances:
- February 2000: During a "Today Show" interview, Trump called David Duke, a former KKK Grand Wizard, a “bigot” and a “racist” (Voice of America).
- August 2017: In response to the Charlottesville incident, Trump condemned “the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups” as “repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans” (Voice of America) (YouTube).
- August 2019: Following mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton, Trump condemned white supremacy, stating, “In one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, and white supremacy” (YouTube).
- September 2020: After a controversial debate comment regarding the Proud Boys, Trump later stated, “I’ve always denounced any form of that, you have to denounce” when asked to clarify his stance on white supremacist groups (Voice of America).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd0cMmBvqWc
But flopping your genitals out in front of kids as an adult is evil and the gays are in a political march alongside them by choice. Therefore they're all supporting the same thing by your logic.
3 <<< 40 examples just fyi. So trump has denounced white nationalists more and biden seemingly only denounced when he's trying to smear trump as a white nationalist with lies like the fine people hoaxHe lies a lot. A lot. He is counting on their votes and wants them to "stand by" in case he doesn't win.
You're a gullible dumbass.
As for Joe Biden:
Key Instances of Denouncement
- Inaugural Address (January 20, 2021)
- Joint Session of Congress (April 28, 2021):In his address to a joint session of Congress, Biden emphasized the need to tackle white supremacy:
- Remarks on Charlottesville (August 14, 2017)
So you'll just be a fvcking coward and abandon your beliefs when someone else shows up. That's good to know.
So when pedos at pride whip their cocks out in front of kids and the gays keep marching along with them they are all guilty by association for not leaving immediately. Got it.
He lies. Constantly. You're one of the rubes who takes what he says as truth. How many lies do you have to see to stop believing them and watch the actions. He doesn't clear white nationalists from his rallies, he accepts their support and even calls on them.
GFY - you chose your side.
Yet you can't explain the difference. Fascinating.
GFY - no one has to abandon their beliefs by refusing to be associated with white nationalists. That you would stay and tacitly support them is what's cowardly.
I'm just playing devils advocate here. I've already posted prior to this I'm voting for Biden, but after that fvcking monstrosity of a debate, Venezuela is looking like a better option than voting for either of those two.
I'll be back in a bit...Imma go F myself. Wife is out of town, so I might as well.
@CarolinaHawkeye and @RileyHawk are militants. There's no reasoning with them.
Well, from my perspective it looks like Riley is arguing with himself...my ignore list is apparently messing up the flow of this thread. Come to think of it, how the heck did you not make the cut? LOL
Says the guy who supports white nationalists.
You said there was nothing wrong with being gay in post 125. I never said there was. What I asked you is entirely about guilt by association. You claim that if white supremacists show up and start protesting next to you about something that you have to immediately leave (yield power to white nationalists, not a take I agree with in general) or they're guilty by association. Pedo whips his dick out at pride parade in front of kids, why using that same logic would the gays not need to leave immediately or be branded guilty by association? Are you comprehending the question?
Here's a other one using the logic you're suggesting riley:
BLM riots turn violent when a few bad actors begins burning and looting. If all other protesters do not immediately leave the protest are they all thugs by association as well?
BLM riots turn violent when a few bad actors begins burning and looting. If all other protesters do not immediately leave the protest are they all thugs by association as well?
Answering the question would destroy his/her/they worldview.
One’s own hypocrisy is difficult for the ego to acknowledge.
Riley, why do you have to constantly insult people on here? You do it pretty much every single time you get into a discussion.
There is no quote of him saying Nazis are “fine people”.
That’s disinformation, the question is whether you know that, or are complicit in furthering disinformation.
Didn’t Trump have dinner with Nick Fuentes? Has he denounced him yet?
Were there very fine people marching at the white nationalist rally?
I think someone can oppose renaming a park without being a white nationalist or Nazi.
Same way someone can oppose naming a park after a Confederate general without being a communist.
There were certainly communists and Nazis there, but I doubt that would include everyone.
Yes, but Fuentes was an uninvited guest/tag along of Kanye west. Trump did have this to say in general though:
“I had never heard of the man—I had no idea what his views were and they weren’t expressed at the table in our very quick dinner, or it wouldn’t have been accepted,”
So yes, he said his views were unacceptable.
You're a f**king idiot. No reasoning with you or any other maga scum. But go ahead and support fascism. I prefer to fight fascism as America did in WW2.
If you can explain fascism to me as it relates to Trump, I'll go along with it.
Come on, man. You have to at least acknowledge there's a little fascist flavoring. It's not a huge leap to draw parallels between Trump's rhetoric and certain aspects of fascist ideology. Look at his strongman image and nationalist rhetoric. Now, I'd certainly argue that his administration did not fully align with the historical characteristics of other fascist regimes, but there's at least a sprinkle of it; enough to cause pause if he were to be given the keys to the kingdom again.
I can see sprinkles. I could see potential for more, but what I mostly see is hyperbole when relating Trump to fascism, which is fitting as that's very Trumpian to speak in hyperbolic terms.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Monday Six-Pack, 9/30: Caitlin Clark, Christine Brennan, Media Days, More
- Latest: WaterlooChazz
-
-
-