Clauser's credibility on climate change - just based on his public pronouncements - is effectively zero. It would be like Klaus Hasselmann - a Nobel laureate for his work on climate change - announcing that Clauser's Nobel is bogus because photons don't actually entangle. The fact that Hasselmann has a Nobel wouldn't give any weight to his views on entanglement.I did some Googling and found that he is a Nobel Prize laureate with a prestigious academic background and several articles published in Physics academic journals.
Publications | clauser
www.johnclauser.com
While I don't think his admittedly impressive credentials in Physics give his theory on Climate Change as much weight as the majority consensus of actual Climatologists, I think they do give him enough credibility that his theories should not be dismissed out-of-hand without providing substantive arguments and evidence that rebut his theory.
Last edited: