ADVERTISEMENT

80% support voter ID

Seems decent. Joe machin is the most reasonable D there is. If we had 100 senators and 435 reps like him we'd be ok.

I'd like the proposal to mandate cleaning of voter rolls to account for dead people and those registered in multiple states.

Also, I didn't see this but it should outlaw federally paid political operatives from taking ballots around and 'helping' people fill them out.

In any case though, this is probably better than the current system.
 
You want the government to be able to track me with a chip???
Well, as long as you have a cell phone…
If I could wave a magic wand I'd like to see 20 days early voting as a minimum standard AND I'd count absentee ballots as they come in. Don't really want to see another Pennsylvania shit show. Need a election result as quickly as possible....

Im okay with waiting until the day of to start counting. You just know that if they counted ballots as they came in, that would get out somewhere and potentially reduce turnout. The problem in PA and elsewhere was they had to wait until aft the polls closed, or until other ballots from Election Day were counted first before counting the absentee ballots.
 
Well, as long as you have a cell phone…


Im okay with waiting until the day of to start counting. You just know that if they counted ballots as they came in, that would get out somewhere and potentially reduce turnout. The problem in PA and elsewhere was they had to wait until aft the polls closed, or until other ballots from Election Day were counted first before counting the absentee ballots.
And you dont keep a lot of people entertained and watching TV networks by having it wrapped up by 10pm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sober_teacher
Well, as long as you have a cell phone…


Im okay with waiting until the day of to start counting. You just know that if they counted ballots as they came in, that would get out somewhere and potentially reduce turnout. The problem in PA and elsewhere was they had to wait until aft the polls closed, or until other ballots from Election Day were counted first before counting the absentee ballots.
There has to be a way of entering the votes but not compiling totals until Election Day. Input as you go and on ED hit a button. Clickety click.
 
Seems decent. Joe machin is the most reasonable D there is. If we had 100 senators and 435 reps like him we'd be ok.

I'd like the proposal to mandate cleaning of voter rolls to account for dead people and those registered in multiple states.

Also, I didn't see this but it should outlaw federally paid political operatives from taking ballots around and 'helping' people fill them out.

In any case though, this is probably better than the current system.
Not sure why there isn't a database in each state that people are listed into for reasons such as drivers license, taxes, hunting license, etc. Then, when a death cert is issued they drop out of system. Something like that.
 
Seems decent. Joe machin is the most reasonable D there is. If we had 100 senators and 435 reps like him we'd be ok.

I'd like the proposal to mandate cleaning of voter rolls to account for dead people and those registered in multiple states.

Also, I didn't see this but it should outlaw federally paid political operatives from taking ballots around and 'helping' people fill them out.

In any case though, this is probably better than the current system.
Lol... Looks like someone took the conspiracy theory bait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
It's pretty interesting to see so many conservatives show support for federal standards on elections and use European governments as a reference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Because the current system in many states is left up to the party in control. Do you see how "trying" to taking politics out of it might be beneficial?

Your solution to this is an "independent council" which you concede is an impossibility. Do you not find that odd?
 
Well, as long as you have a cell phone…


Im okay with waiting until the day of to start counting. You just know that if they counted ballots as they came in, that would get out somewhere and potentially reduce turnout. The problem in PA and elsewhere was they had to wait until aft the polls closed, or until other ballots from Election Day were counted first before counting the absentee ballots.
They counted them as they came here in Florida and we basically had a result a couple hours after the polls closed.

I get your point though.....wouldn't want results to get out.
 
I was laughing about this earlier. I've never seen so many 'Merica First folks use European countries as their example for democracy, but not a lot surprises me about this party anymore. Sadly.
The European model is used, when it's useful, by both sides.
 
The European model is used, when it's useful, by both sides.
Honestly, I've never even heard of the, "European Model," as it relates to elections, and have no idea what it means. My comment, which apparently you agree with, is a remark about the irony of merica firsters citing European countries as a beacon of democracy. Lol.
 
Your solution to this is an "independent council" which you concede is an impossibility. Do you not find that odd?

Well, there are several states which use a bipartisan committee of some form to draw districts. Would you agree that the way its done in most states now isn’t good?
 
If Democrats want to put ro rest the concerns of election fraud, they'd be 100% behind voter ID laws. Of course they don't because it would prevent them from making the same claims when they lose.
If voter ID put to rest concerns of election fraud then why are they "auditing" Arizona. They have voter ID.



Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia were the states Trump sued to contest. Four of those six currently have voter ID requirements.
 
I don't think Voter ID is necessary, but if we can find a way to do it that doesn't disenfranchise the poor, elderly, and homeless then I'm ok with it. It just seems like an answer for a problem we don't really have. I agree with you. I'm far more interested in getting rid of political gerrymandering. The fact that we allow the party in power to map the districts so they can increase their own power is insane.

The other major issue is Republicans closing polling stations in urban, high minority areas making it more difficult to vote. I'd be more than happy to give you voting id if we got rid of those two issues.
That doesn't happen! It is just a left wing Democrat wives-tale! Prove it!! (he says.....tongue-in-cheek!) I imagine a voter ID would take care of that problem, too.......
 
If Democrats want to put ro rest the concerns of election fraud, they'd be 100% behind voter ID laws. Of course they don't because it would prevent them from making the same claims when they lose.
As I posted earlier, I am ok with voter ID laws, just not the lack of free and fair access to such ID's.

BTW - There are no concerns of election fraud; that's a right wing fairy tale, proven over and over again.
 
“So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break. You know, we have that in spades already.”

But...voter ID!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sob5
Seems decent. Joe machin is the most reasonable D there is. If we had 100 senators and 435 reps like him we'd be ok.

I'd like the proposal to mandate cleaning of voter rolls to account for dead people and those registered in multiple states.

Also, I didn't see this but it should outlaw federally paid political operatives from taking ballots around and 'helping' people fill them out.

In any case though, this is probably better than the current system.
Where does this occur? That is the whole reason for the absentee ballot.......You request a ballot by filling out a form....a ballot is sent to you, you fill it out and mail it back in.....But you are saying that folks are delivering ballots and filling them out for folks? I have never heard of this before.....I am sure it might happen.....but you think it is a problem? And are you alleging that this is an organized project of Democrats and that Repubbers don't engage in it, too?
 
If I could wave a magic wand I'd like to see 20 days early voting as a minimum standard AND I'd count absentee ballots as they come in. Don't really want to see another Pennsylvania shit show. Need a election result as quickly as possible....
The "Pennsylvania shit show" was the result of rules made by a Republican Pennsylvania legislature.....What difference does it make when absentee and early ballots are counted? What id important is they are counted accurately. This is all a Trump paranoia thing about counting the votes late...,.Maybe Iowa ought to require that all votes from its Congressional District 4 be counted before any other votes are counted in Iowa so Dems don't lose statewide elections late????
 
  • Like
Reactions: sob5
The "Pennsylvania shit show" was the result of rules made by a Republican Pennsylvania legislature.....What difference does it make when absentee and early ballots are counted? What id important is they are counted accurately. This is all a Trump paranoia thing about counting the votes late...,.Maybe Iowa ought to require that all votes from its Congressional District 4 be counted before any other votes are counted in Iowa so Dems don't lose statewide elections late????
I don't think it benefits anyone to wait a couple days for results....the sooner the better IMO. Of course accuracy is the ultimate objective but they're ways to get there faster.
 
You're barking up the wrong tree here. Requiring voter ID is a non-issue for me and quite frankly I think opposition is pretty ridiculous.
This is, again, because you aren't capable of seeing how it will be used to repress voters. Particularly minority and poorer voters.
 
It is suppression, but you are right that Gerrymandering is a greater evil and I could live with it if Gerrymandering was ended. Bye Bye Dan Crenshaw.
I had to show my drivers license to get my covid vaccine. Where's the rage for that?
 
If everyone were able to have a free and easily attainable form of ID that is acceptable for voting purposes, this wouldn't be a problem.

Easily attainable being the key here.

Lots of minorities and poor don't have the time to go to some single location in a major city and wait in line for a photo ID. And if they change address and their new address doesn't match what's on the ID you can bet that will be used to invalidate their vote. Meanwhile, today, they can simply mail in an updated registration form, and do not need any "new ID".

This is simply another tool in the toolbox to deny voting rights to minorities and poor; there have been practically zero instances of in-person voter fraud, which means IDs are a complete waste of money, and the motivations for pushing them are not what you think they are.
 
Dems have to drop the “voter ID is voter suppression” BS.


Concentrate on getting rid of gerrymandering, increase early voting and ensuring enough polling places. Those are the main issues IMO.

Manchins plan is the way to go

So you've refused to learn about why voter ID is suppressive to people of color and their right to vote. Even though it's been explained and you can find all kinds of information about why it's a form of suppression online. Disappointing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT