You're trying to have it both ways. Either the justice system and their "beyond reasonable doubt" standard is what matters or it doesn't. What you're doing is substituting your opinion for the court system in the OJ and Casey Anthony cases because of YOUR OPINION. Which is fine because, either way, I've made this point what feels like hundreds of times: proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a criminal court standard, and is only used in our society as to the question of whether we should take somebody's freedom away. In all other parts of life, we judge people constantly on much, much lower standards, even for the same actions. "Not being on the Iowa wrestling team" is not a criminal punishment, and thus does not require a criminal standard.