I'm trying to be open-minded, and listen to the actual complaints by Porter and those who feel they were maligned by Iowa coaches and staff members.
I listened to the entire Porter/Harty radio interview. Porter had zero substance. Zero specifics about anything.
If Porter said they offered suggested changes, and Kirk refused, I'd understand where Porter is coming from. If Porter said nothing within the program has changed, I would understand his position.
That doesn't seem to be the case. Changes have been made, and guys like Porter have said they are good. He had no specifics about ongoing issues. Ok, I guess he didn't like the lack of answers to his October DEI quiz. That is it, the only criticism he had was showing up to quiz the coaches, and half didn't have an answer for him.
He said "Kirk would rather fall on his sword to protect Brian and the other coaches."
I'm going to have to hear some criticism of substance to give any credence to his side.
Calling for the entire leadership of the program to resign, with zero specifics to back it up, is weak.